|
|
|
Three-party quantum key agreement with seven-particle entangled states against collective noise: IBM Qiskit implementation |
| She-Xiang Jiang(蒋社想)1,2,† and Jin-Huan Li(李金欢)1,2 |
1 State Key Laboratory of Digital Intelligent Technology for Unmanned Coal Mining, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, China; 2 School of Computer Science and Engineering, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Quantum key agreement (QKA) constitutes a vital branch of quantum cryptography, referring to the collaborative establishment of a shared key among multiple participants. Among these, the three-party quantum key agreement (TPQKA) represents a specific form of QKA involving only three participants. Quantum states inevitably suffer from noise during transmission through quantum channels, which reduces the efficiency of qubits. To significantly improve the efficiency of qubits and further enhance their reliability in quantum applications, this paper proposes two TPQKA protocols based on seven-particle entangled states to provide protection against collective noise effects. In this paper, IBM Qiskit is employed to present the preparation circuit of the seven-particle entangled state, as well as the quantum circuits under two types of collective noise. In both protocols, the three parties apply a hash function to their own keys. In the particle transmission process, according to the measurement results of the particles, the three parties perform the corresponding unitary operation, and ultimately they equally negotiate the final shared key. Both protocols are robust against collective noise, and their qubit efficiency reaches 19.35%. In addition, the security analysis shows that both protocols are resistant to participant attacks and outside attacks, including intercept-resend attacks and entangle-measure attacks. This paper details the detection method of eavesdropping by eavesdroppers in collective noise through simulation, and finally presents key post-processing.
|
Received: 20 January 2026
Revised: 15 March 2026
Accepted manuscript online: 18 March 2026
|
|
PACS:
|
03.67.-a
|
(Quantum information)
|
| |
03.67.Dd
|
(Quantum cryptography and communication security)
|
| |
03.67.Hk
|
(Quantum communication)
|
|
| Fund: Project supported by the Coal-Major Project (Grant No. 2025ZD1700704), the Talent Introduction Fund of the Anhui University of Science and Technology (Grant No. 2021yjrc34), and the Scientific Research Fund of the Anhui Provincial Education Department (Grant No. KJ2020A0301). |
Corresponding Authors:
She-Xiang Jiang
E-mail: sxjiang@aust.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
She-Xiang Jiang(蒋社想) and Jin-Huan Li(李金欢) Three-party quantum key agreement with seven-particle entangled states against collective noise: IBM Qiskit implementation 2026 Chin. Phys. B 35 070307
|
[1] Wiesner S 1983 ACM SIGACT News 15 78 [2] Bennett C H and Brassard G 2014 Theor. Comput. Sci. 560 7 [3] Zhou S, Xie Q M and Zhou N R 2024 Laser Phys. Lett. 21 065207 [4] Zhou C, Wang H T, Lu Y F, et al. 2024 Chin. Phys. B 33 100302 [5] Chen S S, Zhou L and Zhong W 2018 Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 61 90312 [6] Dutta A and Pathak A 2022 Quantum Inf. Process. 22 13 [7] Hu W W, Zhou R G and Li X 2023 Chin. Phys. B 32 080303 [8] Hu W W, Zhou R G and Li X 2021 Quantum Inf. Process. 20 1 [9] Bai C M, Liu L and Zhang S 2024 Chin. Phys. B 33 070302 [10] Xiang Y, Tang L and Bai M Q 2021 Mod. Phys. Lett. B 35 2150436 [11] Gao F, Qin S J and Huang W 2019 Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 62 070301 [12] Yang H and Xiao M 2020 Quantum Inf. Process. 19 253 [13] Zhou N R, Chen Z Y, Liu Y Y, et al. 2025 Adv. Quantum Technol. 8 2400530 [14] Huang J H, Li M L, Liu Y Y, et al. 2026 Chin. Phys. B 35 080304 [15] Zhou Y Y, Wang Y P, Dai J Y, et al. 2025 Adv. Quantum Technol. 8 e00439 [16] Hu Y F, Gong L H and Zeng Q W 2025 Quantum Inf. Process. 24 216 [17] Gong L H, Liu Y Y, Huang J H, et al. 2025 Chin. J. Phys. 94 471 [18] Pirandola S, Andersen U L and Banchi L 2020 Adv. Opt. Photonics 12 1012 [19] Okuła R and Mironowicz P 2025 Quantum Inf. Process. 24 50 [20] Zhou N, Zeng G and Xiong J 2004 Electron. Lett. 40 1149 [21] Chong S K, Tsai C W and Hwang T 2011 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 50 1793 [22] Shi R H and Zhong H 2013 Quantum Inf. Process. 12 921 [23] Shukla C, Alam N and Pathak A 2014 Quantum Inf. Process. 13 2391 [24] Shu Y X, Bai C M and Zhang S 2025 EPJ Quantum Technol. 12 48 [25] Zhou Y H, Wang M F and Shi W M 2020 Quantum Inf. Process. 19 100 [26] Jiang S X, Fang L and Fang X J 2023 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 62 235 [27] Tang J, Shi L and Wei J H 2020 Laser Optoelectron. Prog. 57 172703 [28] Wang W, Zhou B M and Zhang L 2020 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 59 1944 [29] Guo J, Yang Z and Bai M Q 2022 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 61 63 [30] Yang H, Lu S and Zhou Q 2024 Quantum Inf. Process. 23 150 [31] Zhou N R, Min S Q and Chen H Y 2018 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 57 3505 [32] Li L, Zhou R G and Zhang X X 2023 Quantum Inf. Process. 22 453 [33] Hwang T, Lee K C and Li C M 2007 IEEE Trans. Dependable Secure Comput. 4 71 [34] He Y F and Ma W P 2015 Quantum Inf. Process. 14 3483 [35] Tang J, Shi L and Wei J 2020 Mod. Phys. Lett. B 34 2050201 [36] YounesMA, Zebboudj S and Gharbi A 2025 arXiv:2507.11188 [quantph] [37] Xu Y, Wang C and Cheng K 2022 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 61 245 [38] Zhu H, Wang C and Li Z 2021 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 60 293 [39] Zhu H, Zhang Y and Chen L 2021 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 60 2753 [40] Duan Y J, Zha X W and Sun X M 2014 Sci. Sin. Phys. Mech. Astron. 44 581 [41] Jiang S X, Li J H and Li S S 2025 Phys. Scr. 100 045109 [42] Hong L J 2023 Design and Analysis of a Multi-Party Quantum Key Agreement Protocol Against Collusion Attacks (Fujian Normal University) [43] Deng F G, Gui L L and Yan W 2004 Chin. Phys. Lett. 21 2097 [44] Deng F G, Li X H and Li C Y 2005 Phys. Rev. A 72 044301 [45] Hegazy S F, Obayya S S A and Saleh B E 2022 J. Lightwave Technol. 40 6995 [46] Ji Z, Fan P and Zhang H 2020 arXiv:2012.14275 [quant-ph] [47] Desurvire E 2009 Classical and Quantum Information Theory: An Introduction for the Telecom Scientist (Cambridge University Press) [48] Yuan Z H 2016 Technol. Innov. Appl. 8 37 [49] Bao X M 2010 Commun. Technol. 43 30 [50] Gander M J and Maurer U M 1994 International Symposium on Information Theory. 351 [51] Huang J 2023 Research on Information Reconciliation and Privacy Amplification Technology in Physical Layer of Optical Communication (Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications) [52] Chen L, Chen X M and Yan Y L 2024 Sci. Rep. 14 25326 [53] Cabello A 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 5635 [54] Pedrotti F L, Pedrotti LMand Pedrotti L S 2017 Introduction to Optics 3rd ed. (Cambridge University Press) [55] Zhao H 2022 Preparation of Quantum Entangled Optical Fields in Telecom Bands and Their Applications in Fiber-Optic Quantum Communication (Shanxi University) [56] Feng J, Wan Z, Li Y, et al. 2017 Opt. Lett. 42 3399 [57] Zhao H, Feng J, Sun J, et al. 2022 Opt. Express 30 3770 [58] Shelby R M, Levenson M D and Bayer P W 1985 Phys. Rev. Lett.54 939 [59] Cheng L, Feng J X, Li Y J, et al. 2024 J. Quantum Opt. 1 |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|