Please wait a minute...
Chin. Phys. B, 2026, Vol. 35(7): 070307    DOI: 10.1088/1674-1056/ae53b6
GENERAL Prev   Next  

Three-party quantum key agreement with seven-particle entangled states against collective noise: IBM Qiskit implementation

She-Xiang Jiang(蒋社想)1,2,† and Jin-Huan Li(李金欢)1,2
1 State Key Laboratory of Digital Intelligent Technology for Unmanned Coal Mining, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, China;
2 School of Computer Science and Engineering, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, China
Abstract  Quantum key agreement (QKA) constitutes a vital branch of quantum cryptography, referring to the collaborative establishment of a shared key among multiple participants. Among these, the three-party quantum key agreement (TPQKA) represents a specific form of QKA involving only three participants. Quantum states inevitably suffer from noise during transmission through quantum channels, which reduces the efficiency of qubits. To significantly improve the efficiency of qubits and further enhance their reliability in quantum applications, this paper proposes two TPQKA protocols based on seven-particle entangled states to provide protection against collective noise effects. In this paper, IBM Qiskit is employed to present the preparation circuit of the seven-particle entangled state, as well as the quantum circuits under two types of collective noise. In both protocols, the three parties apply a hash function to their own keys. In the particle transmission process, according to the measurement results of the particles, the three parties perform the corresponding unitary operation, and ultimately they equally negotiate the final shared key. Both protocols are robust against collective noise, and their qubit efficiency reaches 19.35%. In addition, the security analysis shows that both protocols are resistant to participant attacks and outside attacks, including intercept-resend attacks and entangle-measure attacks. This paper details the detection method of eavesdropping by eavesdroppers in collective noise through simulation, and finally presents key post-processing.
Keywords:  three-party quantum key agreement      seven-particle entangled states      collective noise      simulation      key post-processing  
Received:  20 January 2026      Revised:  15 March 2026      Accepted manuscript online:  18 March 2026
PACS:  03.67.-a (Quantum information)  
  03.67.Dd (Quantum cryptography and communication security)  
  03.67.Hk (Quantum communication)  
Fund: Project supported by the Coal-Major Project (Grant No. 2025ZD1700704), the Talent Introduction Fund of the Anhui University of Science and Technology (Grant No. 2021yjrc34), and the Scientific Research Fund of the Anhui Provincial Education Department (Grant No. KJ2020A0301).
Corresponding Authors:  She-Xiang Jiang     E-mail:  sxjiang@aust.edu.cn

Cite this article: 

She-Xiang Jiang(蒋社想) and Jin-Huan Li(李金欢) Three-party quantum key agreement with seven-particle entangled states against collective noise: IBM Qiskit implementation 2026 Chin. Phys. B 35 070307

[1] Wiesner S 1983 ACM SIGACT News 15 78
[2] Bennett C H and Brassard G 2014 Theor. Comput. Sci. 560 7
[3] Zhou S, Xie Q M and Zhou N R 2024 Laser Phys. Lett. 21 065207
[4] Zhou C, Wang H T, Lu Y F, et al. 2024 Chin. Phys. B 33 100302
[5] Chen S S, Zhou L and Zhong W 2018 Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 61 90312
[6] Dutta A and Pathak A 2022 Quantum Inf. Process. 22 13
[7] Hu W W, Zhou R G and Li X 2023 Chin. Phys. B 32 080303
[8] Hu W W, Zhou R G and Li X 2021 Quantum Inf. Process. 20 1
[9] Bai C M, Liu L and Zhang S 2024 Chin. Phys. B 33 070302
[10] Xiang Y, Tang L and Bai M Q 2021 Mod. Phys. Lett. B 35 2150436
[11] Gao F, Qin S J and Huang W 2019 Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 62 070301
[12] Yang H and Xiao M 2020 Quantum Inf. Process. 19 253
[13] Zhou N R, Chen Z Y, Liu Y Y, et al. 2025 Adv. Quantum Technol. 8 2400530
[14] Huang J H, Li M L, Liu Y Y, et al. 2026 Chin. Phys. B 35 080304
[15] Zhou Y Y, Wang Y P, Dai J Y, et al. 2025 Adv. Quantum Technol. 8 e00439
[16] Hu Y F, Gong L H and Zeng Q W 2025 Quantum Inf. Process. 24 216
[17] Gong L H, Liu Y Y, Huang J H, et al. 2025 Chin. J. Phys. 94 471
[18] Pirandola S, Andersen U L and Banchi L 2020 Adv. Opt. Photonics 12 1012
[19] Okuła R and Mironowicz P 2025 Quantum Inf. Process. 24 50
[20] Zhou N, Zeng G and Xiong J 2004 Electron. Lett. 40 1149
[21] Chong S K, Tsai C W and Hwang T 2011 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 50 1793
[22] Shi R H and Zhong H 2013 Quantum Inf. Process. 12 921
[23] Shukla C, Alam N and Pathak A 2014 Quantum Inf. Process. 13 2391
[24] Shu Y X, Bai C M and Zhang S 2025 EPJ Quantum Technol. 12 48
[25] Zhou Y H, Wang M F and Shi W M 2020 Quantum Inf. Process. 19 100
[26] Jiang S X, Fang L and Fang X J 2023 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 62 235
[27] Tang J, Shi L and Wei J H 2020 Laser Optoelectron. Prog. 57 172703
[28] Wang W, Zhou B M and Zhang L 2020 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 59 1944
[29] Guo J, Yang Z and Bai M Q 2022 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 61 63
[30] Yang H, Lu S and Zhou Q 2024 Quantum Inf. Process. 23 150
[31] Zhou N R, Min S Q and Chen H Y 2018 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 57 3505
[32] Li L, Zhou R G and Zhang X X 2023 Quantum Inf. Process. 22 453
[33] Hwang T, Lee K C and Li C M 2007 IEEE Trans. Dependable Secure Comput. 4 71
[34] He Y F and Ma W P 2015 Quantum Inf. Process. 14 3483
[35] Tang J, Shi L and Wei J 2020 Mod. Phys. Lett. B 34 2050201
[36] YounesMA, Zebboudj S and Gharbi A 2025 arXiv:2507.11188 [quantph]
[37] Xu Y, Wang C and Cheng K 2022 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 61 245
[38] Zhu H, Wang C and Li Z 2021 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 60 293
[39] Zhu H, Zhang Y and Chen L 2021 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 60 2753
[40] Duan Y J, Zha X W and Sun X M 2014 Sci. Sin. Phys. Mech. Astron. 44 581
[41] Jiang S X, Li J H and Li S S 2025 Phys. Scr. 100 045109
[42] Hong L J 2023 Design and Analysis of a Multi-Party Quantum Key Agreement Protocol Against Collusion Attacks (Fujian Normal University)
[43] Deng F G, Gui L L and Yan W 2004 Chin. Phys. Lett. 21 2097
[44] Deng F G, Li X H and Li C Y 2005 Phys. Rev. A 72 044301
[45] Hegazy S F, Obayya S S A and Saleh B E 2022 J. Lightwave Technol. 40 6995
[46] Ji Z, Fan P and Zhang H 2020 arXiv:2012.14275 [quant-ph]
[47] Desurvire E 2009 Classical and Quantum Information Theory: An Introduction for the Telecom Scientist (Cambridge University Press)
[48] Yuan Z H 2016 Technol. Innov. Appl. 8 37
[49] Bao X M 2010 Commun. Technol. 43 30
[50] Gander M J and Maurer U M 1994 International Symposium on Information Theory. 351
[51] Huang J 2023 Research on Information Reconciliation and Privacy Amplification Technology in Physical Layer of Optical Communication (Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications)
[52] Chen L, Chen X M and Yan Y L 2024 Sci. Rep. 14 25326
[53] Cabello A 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 5635
[54] Pedrotti F L, Pedrotti LMand Pedrotti L S 2017 Introduction to Optics 3rd ed. (Cambridge University Press)
[55] Zhao H 2022 Preparation of Quantum Entangled Optical Fields in Telecom Bands and Their Applications in Fiber-Optic Quantum Communication (Shanxi University)
[56] Feng J, Wan Z, Li Y, et al. 2017 Opt. Lett. 42 3399
[57] Zhao H, Feng J, Sun J, et al. 2022 Opt. Express 30 3770
[58] Shelby R M, Levenson M D and Bayer P W 1985 Phys. Rev. Lett.54 939
[59] Cheng L, Feng J X, Li Y J, et al. 2024 J. Quantum Opt. 1
[1] Spatiotemporal pulse-shaping effects on 4-μm laser-driven Sn microdroplet plasmas for extreme ultraviolet emission
Qi Min(敏琦), Chunbo Miao(苗春波), Hongyu Liu(刘宏宇), Xingbang Liu(刘兴邦), Haidong Lu(卢海东), Maogen Su(苏茂根), and Chenzhong Dong(董晨钟). Chin. Phys. B, 2026, 35(7): 075203.
[2] Numerical simulation of corona in electrical equipment operated at high altitude
Yue Zhang(张跃), Zhou Huang(黄洲), Xue-Ming Shen(沈雪明), Gen-Bo Zhang(张根博), and Wen-Jun Ning(宁文军). Chin. Phys. B, 2026, 35(7): 075202.
[3] Molecular dynamics insights into limited impact of nanoscale defects on lithocholic acid adsorption on graphene
Rui-Jian Yang(杨瑞建) and Zhi-Gang Shao(邵志刚). Chin. Phys. B, 2026, 35(7): 076803.
[4] Modeling of a dual-capacitor neuron without an inductor
Zhen-Hua Yu(于振华), Yu-Chen Zhang(张钰晨), and Fei-Fei Yang(杨飞飞). Chin. Phys. B, 2026, 35(6): 060513.
[5] Exploring protein conformations by cluster-guided iterative multiple independent molecular dynamics simulations
Chengtao Ding(丁成涛), Guanglin Chen(陈光临), Qingguo Gong(龚庆国), and Zhiyong Zhang(张志勇). Chin. Phys. B, 2026, 35(5): 058702.
[6] Inhibitory effect of Relatlimab on LAG3-FGL1 interaction investigated by molecular dynamics simulation
Qing Xie(谢晴), Xue-Feng Liu(刘雪峰), Yu-Qing Wang(王雨晴), and Chen-Xiang Wang(王辰祥). Chin. Phys. B, 2026, 35(4): 048701.
[7] Be-B thin film growth: A deep potential and molecular dynamics study
Xilei Wang(王熙蕾) and Hong Zhang(张红). Chin. Phys. B, 2026, 35(4): 046801.
[8] Analogous Faraday effect of spin waves propagating in ferromagnetic nanotubes
Li Zhou(周利), Zhixuan Ren(任芷萱), and Ming Yan(颜明). Chin. Phys. B, 2026, 35(4): 047501.
[9] Contribution of x-ray incident position dependence to energy resolution of Ti/Au transition-edge sensors
Qing-Xiao Ma(马卿效), Wen Zhang(张文), Pei-Zhan Li(李佩展), Zhi-Fa Feng(冯志发), Xian-Feng Zhou(周先锋), Zheng Wang(王争), Jia-Qiang Zhong(钟家强), Wei Miao(缪巍), Yuan Ren(任远), Jing Li(李婧), and Sheng-Cai Shi(史生才). Chin. Phys. B, 2026, 35(3): 038501.
[10] Fuzzy-theory-based social force model for simulating pedestrian choice of ticket gates in subway stations
Yong-Xing Li(李永行), Xiao-Xiao Fu(付潇潇), Jing-Xuan Peng(彭靖萱), Zhi-Lu Yuan(原志路), and Xiao-Xia Yang(杨晓霞). Chin. Phys. B, 2026, 35(3): 038901.
[11] Mechanism of loop-2 in facilitating microtubule depolymerase activity of kinesin-8 motors
Xiao-Xuan Shi(史晓璇), Yao Wang(王瑶), Jie Wang(王杰), Yu-Ru Liu(刘玉如), and Ping Xie(谢平). Chin. Phys. B, 2026, 35(2): 028701.
[12] Effect of chemical short-range order on primary radiation damage in TiVTaNb high-entropy alloys
Yong-Peng Zhao(赵永鹏), Yu-Ze Liu(刘禹泽), Yan-Kun Dou(豆艳坤), Zhong-Ao Zhang(张忠傲), Xin-Fu He(贺新福), and Wen Yang(杨文). Chin. Phys. B, 2026, 35(2): 026101.
[13] Simulation on mechanochemical coupling of rotary biomotors F1 and V1
Liqiang Dai(戴立强), Yao-Gen Shu(舒咬根), and Zhong-Can Ouyang(欧阳钟灿). Chin. Phys. B, 2026, 35(2): 028702.
[14] Structures and dynamics of helium in liquid lithium: A study by deep potential molecular dynamics
Xinyu Zhu(朱新宇), Jianchuan Liu(刘建川), Tao Chen(陈涛), Xinyue Xie(谢炘玥), Jin Wang(王进), Yi Xie(谢懿), Chenxu Wang(王晨旭), and Mohan Chen(陈默涵). Chin. Phys. B, 2026, 35(1): 013101.
[15] Review of machine learning tight-binding models: Route to accurate and scalable electronic simulations
Jijie Zou(邹暨捷), Zhanghao Zhouyin(周寅张皓), Shishir Kumar Pandey, and Qiangqiang Gu(顾强强). Chin. Phys. B, 2026, 35(1): 017101.
No Suggested Reading articles found!