|
Special Issue:
Featured Column — INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT
|
| INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Imaging plate scanners calibration and the attenuation behavior of imaging plate signals |
| Nan Bo(薄楠)1,2 and Nai-Yan Wang(王乃彦)2,† |
1 College of Nuclear Science and Technology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;
2 China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing 102413, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Based on previously reported work, we propose a new method for calibrating image plate (IP) scanners, offering greater flexibility and convenience, which can be extended to the calibration tasks of various scanner models. This method was applied to calibrate the sensitivity of a GE Typhoon FLA 7000 scanner. Additionally, we performed a calibration of the spontaneous signal attenuation behavior for BAS-MS, BAS-SR, and BAS-TR type IPs under the 20$\pm$1$^\circ$C environmental conditions, and observed significant signal carrier diffusion behavior in BAS-MS IP. The calibration results lay a foundation for further research on the interaction between ultra-short, ultra-intense lasers and matter.
|
Received: 24 April 2024
Revised: 26 April 2024
Accepted manuscript online: 12 April 2024
|
|
PACS:
|
07.07.Hj
|
(Display and recording equipment, oscilloscopes, TV cameras, etc.)
|
| |
07.60.Dq
|
(Photometers, radiometers, and colorimeters)
|
| |
06.20.-f
|
(Metrology)
|
| |
06.60.Jn
|
(High-speed techniques)
|
|
| Fund: This work was supported by the Nuclear Industry Academician Fund, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 1220051312), and Young Talents Fund of China National Nuclear Corporation (Grant No. FY212406000901). |
Corresponding Authors:
Nai-Yan Wang
E-mail: wangny@bnu.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Nan Bo(薄楠) and Nai-Yan Wang(王乃彦) Imaging plate scanners calibration and the attenuation behavior of imaging plate signals 2024 Chin. Phys. B 33 060701
|
[1] Salamin Y I, Hu S X, Hatsagortsyan K Z and Keitel C H 2006 Phys. Rep. 427 41
[2] Günther M M, Rosmej O N, Tavana P, Gyrdymov M, Skobliakov A, Kantsyrev A, Zähter S, Borisenko N G, Pukhov A and Andreev N E 2022 Nat. Commun. 13 170
[3] Rosmej O N, Andreev N E, Zaehter S, Zahn N, Christ P, Borm B, Radon T, Sokolov A, Pugachev L P, Khaghani D, Horst F, Borisenko N G, Sklizkov G and Pimenov V G 2019 New J. Phys. 21 043044
[4] Rosmej O N, Suslov N, Martsovenko D, et al. 2015 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 57 094001
[5] Arikawa Y, Kojima S, Morace A, et al. 2017 Nucl. Fusion 57 066022
[6] Bin J H, Obst-Huebl L, Mao J H, et al. 2022 Sci. Rep. 12 1484
[7] Ewald F, Schwoerer H, Düsterer S, Sauerbrey R, Magill J, Galy J, Schenkel R, Karsch S, Habs D and Witte K 2003 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 45 A83
[8] Hidding B, Pretzler G, Clever M, Brandl F, Zamponi F, Lubcke A, Kampfer T, Uschmann I, Förster E, Schramm U, Sauerbrey R, Kroupp E, Veisz L, Schmid K, Benavides S and Kärsch S 2007 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 78 083301
[9] Batani D, Santos J, Forestier-Colleoni P, Mancelli D, Ehret M, Trela J, Morace A, Jakubowska K, Antonelli L, Sorbo D, Manclossi M and Veltcheva M 2019 J. Fusion Energy 38 299
[10] Rowlands J A 2002 Phys. Med. Biol. 47 R123
[11] Bonnet T, Comet M, Denis-Petit D, Gobet F, Hannachi F, Tarisien M, Versteegen M and Aleonard M M 2013 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 84 013508
[12] Glenn G, Tiwari G, Dyer G, Curry C, Donovan M, Gaul E, Gauthier M, Glenzer S, Gordon J, Hegelich B, Martinez M, McCary E, Spinks M and Ditmire T 2019 J. Instrum. 14 P03012
[13] Kojima S, Inoue S, Dinh T H, Hasegawa N, Mori M, Sakaki H, Yamamoto Y, Sasaki T, Shiokawa K, Kondo K, Yamanaka T, Hashida M, Sakabe S, Nishikino M and Kondo K 2020 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 91 053305
[14] Behrens R and Ambrosi P 2002 Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry 101 73
[15] Boutoux G, Rabhi N, Batani D, Binet A, Ducret J E, Jakubowska K, Nígre J P, Reverdin C and Thfoin I 2015 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 86 113304
[16] Williams G J, Maddox B R, Chen H, Kojima S and Millecchia M 2014 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 85 11
[17] Maddox B R, Park H S, Remington B A, Izumi N, Chen S, Chen C, Kimminau G, Ali Z, Haugh M J and Ma Q 2011 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 82 023111
[18] Dong Y, Zhang Z, Xu M, Du Y, Zhang C, Dong X, He Y, Tan J, Zhang Y, Zhu C, Feng J, Cheng L, Li Y and Li Y 2020 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 91 033105
[19] Singh S, Slavicek T, Hodak R, Versaci R, Pridal P and Kumar D 2017 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 88 075105
[20] Harrison A, Lane L C, Templer R H and Seddon J M 1991 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 310 220
[21] Zeil K, Kraft S D, Jochmann A, Kroll F, Jahr W, Schramm U, Karsch L, Pawelke J, Hidding B and Pretzler G 2010 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 81 013307 |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|
