ELECTROMAGNETISM, OPTICS, ACOUSTICS, HEAT TRANSFER, CLASSICAL MECHANICS, AND FLUID DYNAMICS |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
High-contrast imaging based on wavefront shaping to improve low signal-to-noise ratio photoacoustic signals using superpixel method |
Xinjing Lv(吕新晶)1, Xinyu Xu(徐新羽)1, Qi Feng(冯祺)1, Bin Zhang(张彬)2, Yingchun Ding(丁迎春)1, Qiang Liu(柳强)2 |
1 College of Mathematics and Physics, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China; 2 State Key Laboratory of Precision Measurement Technology and Instruments, Department of Precision Instruments, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China |
|
|
Abstract Photoacoustic (PA) imaging has drawn tremendous research interest for various applications in biomedicine and experienced exponential growth over the past decade. Since the scattering effect of biological tissue on ultrasound is two- to three-orders magnitude weaker than that of light, photoacoustic imaging can effectively improve the imaging depth. However, as the depth of imaging further increases, the incident light is seriously affected by scattering that the generated photoacoustic signal is very weak and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is quite low. Low SNR signals can reduce imaging quality and even cause imaging failure. In this paper, we proposed a new wavefront shaping and imaging method of low SNR photoacoustic signal using digital micromirror device (DMD) based superpixel method. We combined the superpixel method with DMD to modulate the phase and amplitude of the incident light, and the genetic algorithm (GA) was used as the wavefront shaping algorithm. The enhancement of the photoacoustic signal reached 10.46. Then we performed scanning imaging by moving the absorber with the translation stage. A clear image with contrast of 8.57 was obtained while imaging with original photoacoustic signals could not be achieved. The proposed method opens new perspectives for imaging with weak photoacoustic signals.
|
Received: 15 November 2019
Revised: 31 December 2019
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
43.35.Ud
|
(Thermoacoustics, high temperature acoustics, photoacoustic effect)
|
|
42.25.Dd
|
(Wave propagation in random media)
|
|
42.25.Fx
|
(Diffraction and scattering)
|
|
42.30.-d
|
(Imaging and optical processing)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2017YFB1104500), the Beijing Natural Science Foundation, China (Grant No. 7182091), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 21627813), and the Research Projects on Biomedical Transformation of China-Japan Friendship Hospital (Grant No. PYBZ1801). |
Corresponding Authors:
Yingchun Ding, Qiang Liu
E-mail: dingyc@mail.buct.edu.cn;qiangliu@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Xinjing Lv(吕新晶), Xinyu Xu(徐新羽), Qi Feng(冯祺), Bin Zhang(张彬), Yingchun Ding(丁迎春), Qiang Liu(柳强) High-contrast imaging based on wavefront shaping to improve low signal-to-noise ratio photoacoustic signals using superpixel method 2020 Chin. Phys. B 29 034301
|
[1] |
Dravid A and Mazumder N 2018 Laser Med. Sci. 33 1849
|
[2] |
Agarwal A, Huang S W, O'Donnell M, Day K C, Day M, Kotov N and Ashkenazi S 2007 J. Appl. Phys. 102 064701
|
[3] |
Majeed H, Kandel M E, Han K, Luo Z, Macias V, Tangella K, Balla A and Popescu G 2015 J. Biomed. Opt. 20 111210
|
[4] |
Jacques S L 2013 Phys. Med. Biol. 58 R37
|
[5] |
Gareau D S, Abeytunge S and Rajadhyaksha M 2009 Opt. Lett. 34 3235
|
[6] |
Huang D, Swanson E A, Lin C P, Schuman J S, Stinson W G, Chang W, Hee M R, Flotte T, Gregory K, Puliafito C A and Fujimoto J G 1991 Science 254 1178
|
[7] |
Beaurepaire E, Oheim M and Mertz J 2001 Opt. Commun. 188 25
|
[8] |
Ntziachristos V 2010 Nat. Methods 7 603
|
[9] |
Duck F A 2013 Physical properties of tissues: a comprehensive reference book (London: Academic Press) pp. 55-122
|
[10] |
Xu M and Wang L V 2006 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 77 041101
|
[11] |
Yuan Y and Yang S 2012 Chin. Phys. B 21 054211
|
[12] |
Yu H, Park J, Lee K R, Yoon J, Kim K D, Lee S and Park Y K 2015 Curr. Appl. Phys. 15 632
|
[13] |
Popoff S M, Lerosey G, Carminati R, Fink M, Boccara A C and Gigan S 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 100601
|
[14] |
Zhang Z, Zhang B, Feng Q, He H and Ding Y 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 084201
|
[15] |
Yu L, Xu X, Zhang Z, Feng Q, Zhang B, Ding Y and Liu Q 2019 Chin. Phys. Lett. 36 114203
|
[16] |
Vellekoop I M and Mosk A P 2008 Opt. Commun. 281 3071
|
[17] |
Cui M and Yang C 2010 Opt. Express 18 3444
|
[18] |
Shen Y, Liu Y, Ma C and Wang L V 2016 J. Biomed. Opt. 21 085001
|
[19] |
Xu X, Liu H and Wang L V 2011 Nat. Photon. 5 154
|
[20] |
Yu Z, Li H and Lai P 2017 Appl. Sci. 7 1320
|
[21] |
Kong F, Silverman R H, Liu L, Chitnis P V, Lee K K and Chen Y C 2011 Opt. Lett. 36 2053
|
[22] |
Chaigne T, Katz O, Boccara A C, Fink M, Bossy E and Gigan S 2014 Nat. Photon. 8 58
|
[23] |
Caravaca-Aguirre A M, Conkey D B, Dove J D, Ju H, Murray T W and Piestun R 2013 Opt. Express 21 26671
|
[24] |
Conkey D B, Caravaca-Aguirre A M, Dove J D, Ju H, Murray T W and Piestun R 2015 Nat. Commun. 6 7902
|
[25] |
Chaigne T, Gateau J, Katz O, Bossy E and Gigan S 2014 Opt. Lett. 39 2664
|
[26] |
Cao Z, Mu Q, Hu L, Lui Y and Xuan L 2007 Chin. Phys. 16 1665
|
[27] |
Jang M, Ruan H, Vellekoop I M, Judkewitz B, Chung E and Yang C 2015 Biomed. Opt. Express 6 72
|
[28] |
Gu C, Zhang D, Chang Y and Chen S C 2015 Opt. Lett. 40 2870
|
[29] |
Tay J W, Liang J and Wang L V 2014 Opt. Lett. 39 5499
|
[30] |
Tzang O and Piestun R 2016 Opt. Express 24 28122
|
[31] |
Sun J, Zhang B, Feng Q, He H, Ding Y and Liu Q 2019 Sci. Rep. 9 4328
|
[32] |
Vellekoop I M 2015 Opt. Express 23 12189
|
[33] |
Goorden S A, Bertolotti J and Mosk A P 2014 Opt. Express 22 17999
|
[34] |
Jia Y, Feng Q, Zhang B, Wang W, Lin C and Ding Y 2018 Chin. Phys. Lett. 35 054203
|
[35] |
Chaigne T 2016 Control of scattered coherent light and photoacoustic imaging: toward light focusing in deep tissue and enhanced, subacoustic resolution photoacoustic imaging (Ph.D. Dissertation) (Paris: Pierre and Marie Curie University)
|
[36] |
Qiu H, Lee J, Lin J and Yu G 2006 J. Sound Vib. 289 1066
|
[37] |
Peng Z and Wang G 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 4564
|
[38] |
Donoho D L and Johnstone I M 1994 Biometrika 81 425
|
[39] |
Norollah M, Pourghassem H and Mahdavi-nasab H 2012 Fourth International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks, November 3-5, 2012, Mathura, India, p. 331
|
[40] |
Conkey D B, Brown A N, Caravaca-Aguirre A M and Piestun R 2012 Opt. Express 20 4840
|
[41] |
Li W, Lu C and Zhang J 2013 Opt. Laser Technol. 45 654
|
[42] |
Wang D, Zhou E H, Brake J, Ruan H, Jang M and Yang C 2015 Optica 2 728
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|