|
|
Soliton-cnoidal interactional wave solutions for the reduced Maxwell-Bloch equations |
Li-Li Huang(黄丽丽)1,3, Zhi-Jun Qiao(乔志军)2, Yong Chen(陈勇)1,3,4 |
1. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Trustworthy Computing, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China; 2. School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, The University of Texs Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, TX 78539, USA; 3. MOE International Joint Laboratory of Trustworthy Software, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China; 4. Department of Physics, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321004, China |
|
|
Abstract In this paper, we study soliton-cnoidal wave solutions for the reduced Maxwell-Bloch equations. The truncated Painlevé analysis is utilized to generate a consistent Riccati expansion, which leads to solving the reduced Maxwell-Bloch equations with solitary wave, cnoidal periodic wave, and soliton-cnoidal interactional wave solutions in an explicit form. Particularly, the soliton-cnoidal interactional wave solution is obtained for the first time for the reduced Maxwell-Bloch equations. Finally, we present some figures to show properties of the explicit soliton-cnoidal interactional wave solutions as well as some new dynamical phenomena.
|
Received: 20 October 2017
Revised: 17 November 2017
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
02.30.Ik
|
(Integrable systems)
|
|
05.45.Yv
|
(Solitons)
|
|
04.20.Jb
|
(Exact solutions)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the Global Change Research Program of China (Grant No. 2015CB953904), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11675054 and 11435005), the Outstanding Doctoral Dissertation Cultivation Plan of Action (Grant No. YB2016039), and Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Trustworthy Software for Internet of Things (Grant No. ZF1213). Some work was done during the third author (Chen) visited the University of Texas-Rio Grande Valley (UTRGV). The second author (Qiao) thanks the UTRGV President Endowed Professorship (Grant No. 450000123), and the UTRGV College of Science Seed Grant (Grant No. 240000013) for partial support. |
Corresponding Authors:
Yong Chen
E-mail: ychen@sei.ecnu.edu.cn
|
About author: 02.30.IK; 05.45.Yv; 04.20.Jb |
Cite this article:
Li-Li Huang(黄丽丽), Zhi-Jun Qiao(乔志军), Yong Chen(陈勇) Soliton-cnoidal interactional wave solutions for the reduced Maxwell-Bloch equations 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 020201
|
[1] |
Maimistov A I and Basharov A M 1999 Nonlinear optical waves (Berlin:Springer Press)
|
[2] |
Eilbeck J C, Gibbon J D, Caudrey P J and Bullough R K 1973 J. Phys. A:Math. Nucl. Gen. 6 1337
|
[3] |
McCall S L and Hahn E L 1969 Phys. Rev. 183 457
|
[4] |
McCall S L and Hahn E L 1967 Phys. Rev. Lett. 18 908
|
[5] |
Jen S, Mandel B C L and Wolf E 1978 Coherence and quantum optics, Vol. 4(New York:Plenum Press)
|
[6] |
Sun B, Qiao Z J and Chen J 2012 J. Appl. Remote Sens. 6 063547
|
[7] |
Sun B, Gu H C, Hu M Q and Qiao Z J 2015 Proc. SPIE, Compressive Sensing IV 9484 948402
|
[8] |
Gibbon J D, Caudrey P J, Bullough R K and Eilbeck J C 1973 Lett. Nuovo Cimento 8 775
|
[9] |
Ablowitz M J and Clarkson P A 1991 Solitons, Nonlinear Evolution Equations and Inverse Scattering
|
[10] |
Caudrey P J, Eilbeck J C and Gibbon J D 1974 IMA J. Appl. Math. 14 375
|
[11] |
Caudrey P J 2011 Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 369 1215
|
[12] |
Hirota R 2004 The Direct Method in Soliton Theory (Cambridge:Cambridge University Press)
|
[13] |
Guo R, Tian B and Wang L 2012 Nonlinear Dyn. 69 2009
|
[14] |
Shi G H and Fan F 2017 Superlattices and Microstructures 101 488
|
[15] |
Matveev V B and Salle M A 1991 Darboux transformations and solitons (Berlin:Springer)
|
[16] |
Grauel A 1986 J. Phys. A:Math. Gen. 19 479
|
[17] |
Grauel A 1984 Lett. Nuovo Cimento 41 263
|
[18] |
Aiyer R N 1983 J. Phys. A:Math. Nucl. Gen. 16 1809
|
[19] |
Wei J, Wang X and Geng X G 2018 Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 59 1
|
[20] |
Lou S Y 2015 Stud. Appl. Math. 134 372
|
[21] |
Wang Y H and Wang H 2017 Nonlinear Dyn. 89 235
|
[22] |
Cheng X P, Chen C L and Lou S Y 2014 Wave Motion 51 1298
|
[23] |
Hu X R and Chen Y 2015 Z. Naturforsch. 70 729
|
[24] |
Ren B 2015 Phys Scr. 90 065206
|
[25] |
Hu X R and Li Y Q 2016 Appl. Math. Lett. 51 20
|
[26] |
Chen J C and Ma Z Y 2017 Appl. Math. Lett. 64 87
|
[27] |
Wang Q, Chen Y and Zhang H Q 2005 Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 25 1019
|
[28] |
Wang Y H and Wang H 2014 Phys. Scr. 89 125203
|
[29] |
Huang L L and Chen Y 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 060201
|
[30] |
Huang L L and Chen Y 2017 Appl. Math. Lett. 64 177
|
[31] |
Ren B, Xu X J and Lin J 2009 J. Math. Phys. 50 123505
|
[32] |
Xie S Y and Lin J 2010 Chin. Phys. B 19 050201
|
[33] |
Liu Y K and Li B 2017 Chin. Phys. Lett. 34 010202
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|