CONDENSED MATTER: ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE, ELECTRICAL, MAGNETIC, AND OPTICAL PROPERTIES |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Influence of ultra-thin TiN thickness (1.4 nm and 2.4 nm) on positive bias temperature instability (PBTI) of high-k/metal gate nMOSFETs with gate-last process |
Qi Lu-Wei (祁路伟), Yang Hong (杨红), Ren Shang-Qing (任尚清), Xu Ye-Feng (徐烨峰), Luo Wei-Chun (罗维春), Xu Hao (徐昊), Wang Yan-Rong (王艳蓉), Tang Bo (唐波), Wang Wen-Wu (王文武), Yan Jiang (闫江), Zhu Hui-Long (朱慧珑), Zhao Chao (赵超), Chen Da-Peng (陈大鹏), Ye Tian-Chun (叶甜春) |
Key Laboratory of Microelectronics Devices and Integrated Technology, Institute of Microelectronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China |
|
|
Abstract The positive bias temperature instability (PBTI) degradations of high-k/metal gate (HK/MG) nMOSFETs with thin TiN capping layers (1.4 nm and 2.4 nm) are systemically investigated. In this paper, the trap energy distribution in gate stack during PBTI stress is extracted by using ramped recovery stress, and the temperature dependences of PBTI (90 ℃, 125 ℃, 160 ℃) are studied and activation energy (Ea) values (0.13 eV and 0.15 eV) are extracted. Although the equivalent oxide thickness (EOT) values of two TiN thickness values are almost similar (0.85 nm and 0.87 nm), the 2.4-nm TiN one (thicker TiN capping layer) shows better PBTI reliability (13.41% at 0.9 V, 90 ℃, 1000 s). This is due to the better interfacial layer/high-k (IL/HK) interface, and HK bulk states exhibited through extracting activation energy and trap energy distribution in the high-k layer.
|
Received: 26 June 2015
Revised: 27 July 2015
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
73.40.Qv
|
(Metal-insulator-semiconductor structures (including semiconductor-to-insulator))
|
|
85.30.Tv
|
(Field effect devices)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. SS2015AA010601) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61176091 and 61306129). |
Corresponding Authors:
Qi Lu-Wei
E-mail: qiluwei@ime.ac.cn
|
Cite this article:
Qi Lu-Wei (祁路伟), Yang Hong (杨红), Ren Shang-Qing (任尚清), Xu Ye-Feng (徐烨峰), Luo Wei-Chun (罗维春), Xu Hao (徐昊), Wang Yan-Rong (王艳蓉), Tang Bo (唐波), Wang Wen-Wu (王文武), Yan Jiang (闫江), Zhu Hui-Long (朱慧珑), Zhao Chao (赵超), Chen Da-Peng (陈大鹏), Ye Tian-Chun (叶甜春) Influence of ultra-thin TiN thickness (1.4 nm and 2.4 nm) on positive bias temperature instability (PBTI) of high-k/metal gate nMOSFETs with gate-last process 2015 Chin. Phys. B 24 127305
|
[1] |
Ribes G, Mitard J, Denais M, Bruyere S, Monsieur F, Parthasarathy C, Vincent E and Ghibaudo G 2005 IEEE Trans. Dev. Mater. Reliab. 5 5
|
[2] |
Robertson J 2004 Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys. 28 265
|
[3] |
Huard Vincent 2010 in 48th Annual Proceedings: International Reliability Physics Symposium, 2010, May 2-6, Anaheim, USA, p. 33
|
[4] |
Mitard J, Garros X, Nguyen L P, Leroux C, Ghibaudo G, Martin F and Reimbold G 2006 in 44th Annual Proceedings: International Reliability Physics Symposium, 2006, March 26-30, San Jose, USA, p. 174
|
[5] |
Kang C Y, Choi R, Song S C, Ju B S, Hussain M M, Lee B H, Yang J W, Zeitzoff P, Pham D, Xiong W and Tseng H H 2006 in International SOI Conference, October 2-5, New York, USA, p. 135
|
[6] |
Pae S, Agostinelli M, Brazier M, Chau R, Dewey G, Ghani T, Hattendorf M, Hicks J, Kavalieros J, Kuhn K, Kuhn, M, Maiz J, Metz M, Mistry K, Prasad C, Ramey S, Roskowski A, Sandford J, Thomas C, Thomas J, Wiegand C and Wiedemer J 2008 in 46th Annual Proceedings: International Reliability Physics Symposium, 2008, April 27-May 1, Phoenix, UK, p. 352
|
[7] |
Kwong D L 2004 in 11th International Symposium on the Physical and Failure Analysis of Integrated Circuits, July 5-8, Hsinchu, Taiwan, p. 17
|
[8] |
Ang D S, Wang S and Ling C H 2005 IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. 26 906
|
[9] |
Schroder D K and Babcock J A 2003 J. Appl. Phys. 94 1
|
[10] |
BersukerG, Sim J H, Park C S, Young C D, Nadkarni S V, Choi R and Lee B H 2007 IEEE Trans. Dev. Mater. Reliab. 7 138
|
[11] |
Mukhopadhyay S, Joshi K and Chaudhary V 2014 in 52th Annual Proceedings: International Reliability Physics Symposium, 2014, June 1-5, Waikoloa, USA, GD. 3.1-GD. 3.11
|
[12] |
Zheng X F, Zhang W D and Govoreanu B 2010 IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 57 2484
|
[13] |
Zhang X F, Fan S, Kang D, Zhang J K, Cao Y R, Ma X H and Hao Y 2014 Chin. Phys. Lett. 31 127701
|
[14] |
Hatta S W M, Ji Z, Zhang J F, Duan M, Zhang W D, Soin N, Kaczer B, De Gendt S, Groeseneken G and Sharifah Wan Muhamad 2013 IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 60 1745
|
[15] |
Ren S Q, Yang H, Wang W W, Tang B, Tang Z Y, Wang X L, Xu H, Luo W C, Zhao C, Yan J, Chen D P and Ye T C 2015 Chin. Phys. B 24 077304
|
[16] |
Mukhopadhyay S, Joshi K and Chaudhary V 2014 in 52th Annual Proceedings: International Reliability Physics Symposium, 2014, June 1-5, Waikoloa, USA, GD. 3.1-GD. 3.11
|
[17] |
Wu L, Yu H Y, Li X, Pey K L, Hsu K Y, Tao H J, Chiu Y S, Lin C T, Xu J H and Wan H J 2010 International Symposium on VLSI Technology Systems and Applications (VLSI-TSA) pp. 90-91
|
[18] |
Chen C L and King Y C 2011 IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 58 3736
|
[19] |
Groeseneken G, Crupi F, Shickova A, Thijs S, Linten D, Kaczer B and Jurczak M 2008 in 46th Annual Proceedings: International Reliability Physics Symposium, 2008, April 27-May 1, Phoenix, UK, p. 352
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|