GEOPHYSICS, ASTRONOMY, AND ASTROPHYSICS |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Improvement of the axial trapping effect using azimuthally polarised trapping beam |
Li Xue-Cong(李雪璁) and Sun Xiu-Dong(孙秀冬)† |
Department of Physics, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China |
|
|
Abstract A dual optical tweezers system, which consists of a doughnut mode optical tweezer (DMOT) with the azimuthally polarised trapping beam and a solid mode optical tweezer (SMOT) with the Gauss trapping beam was constructed to compare the axial trapping effect of DMOT and SMOT. The long-distance axial trapping of ST68 microbubbles (MBs) achieved by DMOT was more stable than that of SMOT. Moreover the axial trapping force measured using the viscous drag method, was depended on the diameter of the particle, the laser power, and the numerical aperture (NA) of the objective lens. The measurement of the axial trapping force and the acquisition of CCD images of trapping effect confirmed that the DMOT showed excellent axial trapping ability than SMOT. A simple and effective method is developed to improve axial trapping effect using the azimuthally polarized beam as trapping beam. This is helpful for the long-distance manipulating of particles especially polarised biological objects in axial direction.
|
Received: 27 April 2010
Revised: 08 June 2010
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
42.60.Jf
|
(Beam characteristics: profile, intensity, and power; spatial pattern formation)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 10674037), the National Basic Research Program of China (Grant No. 2007CB307001), and the program of excellent Team in Harbin Institute of Technology of China. |
Cite this article:
Li Xue-Cong(李雪璁) and Sun Xiu-Dong(孙秀冬) Improvement of the axial trapping effect using azimuthally polarised trapping beam 2010 Chin. Phys. B 19 119401
|
[1] |
Ashkin A, Dziedzic J M, Bjorkholm J E and Chu S 1986 Opt. Lett. 11 288
|
[2] |
Kou S C and Sheetz M P 1993 Science 260 232
|
[3] |
Xu S H, Li Y M, Lou L R and Sun Z W 2005 Chin. Phys. 14 382
|
[4] |
Li Q, Feng W L, Hu X M, Cao Q, Sha D G and Lin J M 2008 Chin. Phys. B 17 726
|
[5] |
Domachuk P, Magi E, Eggleton B J and Cronin-Golomb M 2006 Appl. Phys. Lett. 89 071106
|
[6] |
Kress H, Stelzer E H K, Griffiths G and Rohrbach A 2005 Phys. Rev. E 71 061927
|
[7] |
Nieminen T A, Heckenberg N R and Rubinsztein-Dunlop H 2008 Opt. Lett. 33 122
|
[8] |
Stalder M and Schadt M 1996 Opt. Lett. 21 1948
|
[9] |
Gao X M, Li J S, Wang J and Zhuang S L 2009 Optik doi:10.1016/j.ijleo.2009.04.013
|
[10] |
Zhan Q W 2003 J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 5 229
|
[11] |
Youngworth K S and Brown T G 2000 Opt. Express 7 77
|
[12] |
Quabis S, Dorn R, Eberler M, Glockl O and Leuchs G 2001 Appl. Phys. B 72 109
|
[13] |
Zhan Q W and Leger J G 2002 Opt. Express 10 324
|
[14] |
Yan S H and Yao B L 2007 Phys. Rev. A 76 053836
|
[15] |
Peng F, Yao B L, Yan S H, Zhao W and Lei M 2009 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 26 2242
|
[16] |
Basude R, Duckworth J W and Wheatley M A 2000 Ultrasound in Med. Biol. 26 621
|
[17] |
Felgner H, Muller O and Schliwa M 1995 Appl. Opt. 34 977
|
[18] |
Ashkin A 1992 Biophys J. 61 569 endfootnotesize
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|