|
|
Entanglement of two atoms interacting with a dissipative coherent cavity field without rotating wave approximation |
Kang Guo-Dong(康国栋), Fang Mao-Fa(方卯发)†, Ouyang Xi-Cheng(欧阳锡城), and Deng Xiao-Juan(邓小娟) |
College of Physics and Information Science, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China |
|
|
Abstract Considering two identical two-level atoms interacting with a single-model dissipative coherent cavity field without rotating wave approximation, we explore the entanglement dynamics of the two atoms prepared in different states using concurrence. Interestingly, our results show that the entanglement between the two atoms that initially disentangled will come up to a large constant rapidly, and then keeps steady in the following time or always has its maximum when prepared in some special Bell states. The model considered in this study is a good candidate for quantum information processing especially for quantum computation as steady high-degree atomic entanglement resource obtained in dissipative cavity.
|
Received: 01 August 2009
Revised: 07 June 2010
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
03.65.Ud
|
(Entanglement and quantum nonlocality)
|
|
37.10.Vz
|
(Mechanical effects of light on atoms, molecules, and ions)
|
|
42.50.Dv
|
(Quantum state engineering and measurements)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 10374025), the Education Ministry of Hunan Province, China (Grant No. 06A038) and the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China (Grant No. 07JJ3013). |
Cite this article:
Kang Guo-Dong(康国栋), Fang Mao-Fa(方卯发), Ouyang Xi-Cheng(欧阳锡城), and Deng Xiao-Juan(邓小娟) Entanglement of two atoms interacting with a dissipative coherent cavity field without rotating wave approximation 2010 Chin. Phys. B 19 110303
|
[1] |
Nilesen M A and Chang I L 2000 Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
|
[2] |
Bennet C H, Brassard G and Vepeau C 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 1895
|
[3] |
Bennet C H and Wiesner S J 1992 Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 2881
|
[4] |
Ekert A 1991 Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 661
|
[5] |
Giovannetti V, Lloyd S and Maccone L 2001 Nature bf 412 417
|
[6] |
Giovannetti V, Lloyd S and Maccone L 2002 Phys. Rev. A 65 022309
|
[7] |
Zeng K and Fang M F 2005 Chin. Phys. 14 2009
|
[8] |
Jin L J and Fang M F 2006 Chin. Phys. bf 15 2012
|
[9] |
Jiang C L, Fang M F and Zheng X J 2006 Chin. Phys. 15 2953
|
[10] |
Song J and Cao Z L 2005 Acta Phys. Sin. 54 696 (in Chinese)
|
[11] |
Wu Y, Payne M G, Hagley E W and Deng L 2004 Phys. Rev. A 70 063812
|
[12] |
Yuan C H, Ou Y C and Zhang Z M 2006 Chin. Phys. bf 15 1793
|
[13] |
Tessier T E, Deutsch I H, Delgado A and Fuentes-Guridi I 2003 Phys. Rev. A 68 062316
|
[14] |
Fujii K, Higashida K, Kato R, Suzuki T and Wada Y 2004 quant-Ph/0404034
|
[15] |
Cai J F 2004 quant-ph/0405176
|
[16] |
Wang X Y, Du S D and Chen X S 2006 J. Phys. B 39 3805
|
[17] |
Retzker A, Solano E and Reznik B 2007 Phys. Rev. A 75 022312
|
[18] |
L'opez C E, Christ H, Retamal J C and Solano E 2007 Phys. Rev. A 75 033818
|
[19] |
L'opez C E, Lastra F, Romero G and Retamal J C 2007 Phys. Rev. A 75 022107
|
[20] |
Chen L, Shao X Q and Zhang S 2009 Chin. Phys. B 18 888
|
[21] |
Guo L and Liang X T 2009 Acta Phys. Sin. 58 50 (in Chinese)
|
[22] |
Zhang G F and Bu J J 2010 Acta Phys. Sin. 59 1462 (in Chinese)
|
[23] |
Leibfried D, Blatt R, Monroe C and Wineland D 2003 Rev. Mod. Phys. 75 281
|
[24] |
Irish E K and Schwab K 2003 Phys. Rev. B 68 155311
|
[25] |
Wallraf A, Schuster D I , Blais A, Frunzio L, Majer J, Devoret M H, Girvin S M and Schoelkopf R J 2004 Nature 431 162
|
[26] |
Chiorescu I, Bertet P, Semba K, Nakamura Y, Harmans C J P M and Mooil J E 2004 Nature 431 159
|
[27] |
Meiser D and Meystre P 2006 quntum-ph/ 0605020
|
[28] |
Li G X and Peng J S1992 Acta Phys. Sin. bf 41 766 (in Chinese)
|
[29] |
Peng J S and Li G X 1992 Phys. Rev. A 45 3289
|
[30] |
Peng J S and Li G X 1991 Acta Phys. Sin. 40 1042 (in Chinese)
|
[31] |
Cui H P, Zou J, Li J G and Shao B 2006 J. Phys. B 40 S143
|
[32] |
Lougovski P, Casagrande F, Lulli A and Solano E 2007 Phys. Rev. A 76 033802
|
[33] |
Lougovski P, Casagrande F, Lulli A, Englert B G, Solano E and Walther H 2004 Phys. Rev. A 69 023812
|
[34] |
Cahill K E and Glauber R J 1969 Phys. Rev. 177 1882
|
[35] |
Barnett S M and Radmore P M 1997 Methods in Theoretical Quantum Optics (Oxford: Clarendon press)
|
[36] |
Beige A, Bose S, Braun D, Huelga S F and Knight P L 2002 J. Mod. Opt. 47 2583
|
[37] |
Cabrillo C, Cirac J I, Garcia-Fernandez P and Zoller P 1999 Phys. Rev. A 59 1025
|
[38] |
Fang M F and Zhu S Y 2006 Physica A 369 475
|
[39] |
Plenio B M and Huega S F 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. bf 88 197901
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|