| ELECTROMAGNETISM, OPTICS, ACOUSTICS, HEAT TRANSFER, CLASSICAL MECHANICS, AND FLUID DYNAMICS |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Proof-of-principle experimental demonstration of quantum secure imaging based on quantum key distribution |
| Yi-Bo Zhao(赵义博)1,2, Wan-Li Zhang(张万里)1,2, Dong Wang(王东)1,2, Xiao-Tian Song(宋萧天)1,2, Liang-Jiang Zhou(周良将)1,2,3, Chi-Biao Ding(丁赤飚)1,2,3 |
1 National Key Laboratory of Microwave Imaging Technology, Beijing 100190, China;
2 Institute of Electronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;
3 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract We present a quantum secure imaging (QSI) scheme based on the phase encoding and weak+vacuum decoy-state BB84 protocol of quantum key distribution (QKD). It allows us to implement a computational ghost imaging (CGI) system with more simplified equipment and reconstructed algorithm by using a digital micro-mirror device (DMD) to preset the specific spatial distribution of the light intensity. What is more, the quantum bit error rate (QBER) and the secure key rate analytical functions of QKD are used to see through the intercept-resend jamming attacks and ensure the authenticity of the imaging information. In the experiment, we obtained the image of the object quickly and efficiently by measuring the signal photon counts with a single-photon detector (SPD), and achieved a secure key rate of 571.0 bps and a secure QBER of 3.99%, which is well below the lower bound of QBER of 14.51%. Besides, our imaging system uses a laser with invisible wavelength of 1550 nm, whose intensity is as low as single-photon, that can realize weak-light imaging and is immune to the stray light or air turbulence, thus it will become a better choice for quantum security radar against intercept-resend jamming attacks.
|
Received: 05 June 2019
Revised: 15 August 2019
Accepted manuscript online:
|
|
PACS:
|
42.30.Va
|
(Image forming and processing)
|
| |
03.67.Dd
|
(Quantum cryptography and communication security)
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
Liang-Jiang Zhou
E-mail: ljzhou@mail.ie.ac.cn
|
Cite this article:
Yi-Bo Zhao(赵义博), Wan-Li Zhang(张万里), Dong Wang(王东), Xiao-Tian Song(宋萧天), Liang-Jiang Zhou(周良将), Chi-Biao Ding(丁赤飚) Proof-of-principle experimental demonstration of quantum secure imaging based on quantum key distribution 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 104203
|
| [1] |
Zhang J D, Zhu D Y and Zhang G 2013 IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 49 1290
|
| [2] |
Butt F A, Naqvi I H and Najam A I 2012 Proceedings of 2012 15th International Multitopic Conference (INMIC), December 13-15, 2012, Islamabad, Pakistan, p. 137
|
| [3] |
Gobby C, Yuan Z L and Shields A J 2004 Appl. Phys. Lett. 84 3762
|
| [4] |
Zhao Y, Qi B, Ma X F, Lo H K and Qian L 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 070502
|
| [5] |
Lo H K, Ma X F and Chen K 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 230504
|
| [6] |
Pittman T B, Shih Y H, Strekalov D V and Sergienko A V 1995 Phys. Rev. A 52 R3429
|
| [7] |
Zhang P L, Gong W L, Shen X and Han S S 2010 Phys. Rev. A 82 033817
|
| [8] |
Malik M, Maga? na-Loaiza O S and Boyd R W 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 101 241103
|
| [9] |
Bennink R S, Bentley S J and Boyd R W 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 113601
|
| [10] |
Gatti A, Brambilla E, Bache M and Lugiato L A 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 093602
|
| [11] |
Valencia A, Scarcelli G, D'Angelo M and Shih Y H 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 063601
|
| [12] |
Xiong J, Cao D Z, Huang F, Li H G, Sun X J and Wang K G 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 173601
|
| [13] |
Zhang D, Zhai Y H, Wu L A and Chen X H 2005 Opt. Lett. 30 2354
|
| [14] |
Cheng J and Han S S 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 093903
|
| [15] |
Zhang M H, Wei Q, Shen X, Liu Y F, Liu H L, Chen J and Han S S 2007 Phys. Rev. A 75 021803
|
| [16] |
Si Y, Kong L J, Li Y N, Tu C H and Wang H T 2016 Chin. Phys. Lett. 33 034203
|
| [17] |
Li H X, Bai Y F, Shi X H, Nan S Q, Qu L J, Shen Q and Fu X Q 2017 Chin. Phys. B 26 104204
|
| [18] |
Luo B, Wu G H and Yin L F 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 094202
|
| [19] |
Shapiro J H 2008 Phys. Rev. A 78 061802
|
| [20] |
Bromberg Y, Katz O and Silberberg Y 2009 Phys. Rev. A 79 053840
|
| [21] |
Katz O, Bromberg Y and Silberberg Y 2009 Appl. Phys. Lett. 95 131110
|
| [22] |
Khamoushi S M M, Nosrati Y and Tavassoli S H 2015 Opt. Lett. 40 3452
|
| [23] |
Shapiro J H 2007 Proceedings of SPIE 6603 Noise and Fluctuations in Photonics, Quantum Optics, and Communications, June 7, 2007, Florence, Italy, p. 660306
|
| [24] |
Jiang K B, Lee H, Gerry C C and Dowling J P 2013 J. Appl. Phys. 114 193102
|
| [25] |
Abouraddy A F, Saleh B E A, Sergienko A V and Teich M C 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 123602
|
| [26] |
Lo H K and Chau H F 1999 Science 283 2050
|
| [27] |
Shor P W and Preskill J 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 441
|
| [28] |
Ma X F, Qi B, Zhao Y and Lo H K 2005 Phys. Rev. A 72 012326
|
| [29] |
Curty M and Lütkenhaus N 2005 Phys. Rev. A 71 062301
|
| [30] |
Bai B, He Y C, Liu J B, Zhou Y, Zheng H B, Zhang S L and Xu Z 2017 Optik 147 136
|
| [31] |
Dupuis J R and Mansur D J 2012 Proceedings of Emerging Digital Micromirror Device Based Systems and Applications IV, February 13, 2012, San Francisco, California, United States, p. 82540J
|
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|
