| SPECIAL TOPIC — Advances in thorium nuclear optical clocks |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Robust excitation of 229Th via generalized composite pulses: Compensating generic errors across arbitrary pulse shapes |
| Rui Zhao(赵睿)1,2, and Yingdan Wang(王颖丹)1,† |
1 Institute of Theoretical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; 2 School of Physical Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract High-fidelity coherent control is a universal challenge due to complex errors and imperfect pulse shapes. Here, we propose a generalized composite pulses scheme independent of pulse profile to correct generic errors. This approach could simultaneously compensate for pulse area errors, detuning, and phase imperfections. We demonstrate its application in the direct laser excitation of the 229Th nucleus isomer state, and show a significant improvement in the robustness against various operation errors, such as detuning, phase error, and pulse area error.
|
Received: 19 January 2026
Revised: 28 February 2026
Accepted manuscript online: 07 March 2026
|
|
PACS:
|
32.80.Qk
|
(Coherent control of atomic interactions with photons)
|
| |
06.30.Ft
|
(Time and frequency)
|
| |
03.67.Bg
|
(Entanglement production and manipulation)
|
|
| Fund: Project supported by the Fundamental and Interdisciplinary Frontier Research Priority Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. XDB0920000), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 12275331), and the Fund from the Penghuanwu Innovative Research Center (Grant No. 12447101). |
Corresponding Authors:
Yingdan Wang
E-mail: yingdan.wang@itp.ac.cn
|
Cite this article:
Rui Zhao(赵睿), and Yingdan Wang(王颖丹) Robust excitation of 229Th via generalized composite pulses: Compensating generic errors across arbitrary pulse shapes 2026 Chin. Phys. B 35 063201
|
[1] Peik E and Okhapkin M 2015 Comptes Rendus. Physique 16 516 [2] Zhang C, Ooi T, Higgins J S, Doyle J F, von der Wense L, Beeks K, Leitner A, Kazakov G A, Li P, Thirolf P G, Schumm T and Ye J 2024 Nature 633 63 [3] Xiao Q, Penyazkov G, Li X, Huang B, Bu W, Shi J, Shi H, Liao T, Yan G, Tian H, Li Y, Li J, Lu B, You L, Lin Y, Mo Y and Ding S 2026 Nature 650 852 [4] Tiedau J, Okhapkin M V, Zhang K, Thielking J, Zitzer G, Peik E, Schaden F, Pronebner T, Morawetz I, De Col L T, Schneider F, Leitner A, Pressler M, Kazakov G A, Beeks K, Sikorsky T and Schumm T 2024 Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 182501 [5] Elwell R, Schneider C, Jeet J, Terhune J E S, Morgan H W T, Alexandrova A N, Tan H B T, Derevianko A and Hudson E R 2024 Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 013201 [6] Levitt M H 1986 Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy 18 61 [7] Levitt M H 2008 Spin Dynamics: Basics of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, 2nd edn. (Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons) [8] Freeman R, Kempsell S P and Levitt M H 1980 Journal of Magnetic Resonance (1969) 38 453 [9] Timoney N, Elman V, Glaser S, Weiss C, Johanning M, Neuhauser W and Wunderlich Chr 2008 Phys. Rev. A 77 052334 [10] Mount E, Kabytayev C, Crain S, Harper R, Baek S Y, Vrijsen G, Flammia S T, Brown K R, Maunz P and Kim J 2015 Phys. Rev. A 92 060301 [11] Butts D L, Kotru K, Kinast J M, Radojevic A M, Timmons B P and Stoner R E 2013 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 30 922 [12] Dunning A, Gregory R, Bateman J, Cooper N, Himsworth M, Jones J A and Freegarde T 2014 Phys. Rev. A 90 033608 [13] Gustavsson S, Zwier O, Bylander J, Yan F, Yoshihara F, Nakamura Y, Orlando T P and Oliver W D 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 040502 [14] Wang X, Bishop L S, Kestner J P, Barnes E, Sun K and Das Sarma S 2012 Nat. Commun. 3 997 [15] Rong X, Geng J, Shi F, Liu Y, Xu K, Ma W, Kong F, Jiang Z, Wu Y and Du J 2015 Nat. Commun. 6 8748 [16] Hollenstein U, Schmutz H, Agner J A, Sommavilla M and Merkt F 2017 J. Chem. Phys. 146 014201 [17] Chini M, Wang X, Cheng Y, Wang H, Wu Y, Cunningham E, Li P C, Heslar J, Telnov D A, Chu S I and Chang Z 2014 Nat. Photon. 8 437 [18] Genov G T, Schraft D, Halfmann T and Vitanov N V 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 043001 [19] Torosov B T and Vitanov N V 2019 Phys. Rev. A 100 023410 [20] von der Wense L, Bilous P V, Seiferle B, Stellmer S, Weitenberg J, Thirolf P G, Palffy A and Kazakov G 2020 Eur. Phys. J. A 56 176 [21] Torosov B T and Vitanov N V 2011 Phys. Rev. A 83 053420 [22] Bilous P, Bekker H, Berengut J, Seiferle B, von der Wense L, Thirolf P G, Pfeifer T, Crespo Lopez-Urrutia J R and Palffy A 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 192502 [23] Porsev S G, Cheung C and Safronova M S 2021 Quantum Sci. Technol. 6 034014 [24] Zhao C C, Li L, Li S M, Gong Q R, Zhang P X, Hang Y, Ma L S and Zhu S N 2026 Chin. Phys. B 35 020602 [25] Xu Y L, Zheng H Y, Yu X C, Zhang Y H, Shi T Y and Tang L Y 2026 Chin. Phys. B 35 023101 [26] Rosen N and Zener C 1932 Phys. Rev. 40 502 [27] Rakreungdet W, Lee J H, Lee K F, Mischuck B E, Montano E and Jessen P S 2009 Phys. Rev. A 79 022316 |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|