|
|
|
Effects of spin-destruction and spin-exchange collisions on alkali-metal relaxation and magnetometric response |
| Feng Tang(汤丰)1†, Jianjun Li(李建军)2†, and Nan Zhao(赵楠)1‡ |
1 Beijing Computational Science Research Center, Beijing 100193, China;
2 State Key Laboratory of Photonics and Communications, School of Electronics, and Center for Quantum Information Technology, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Spin-exchange (SE) and spin-destruction (SD) collisions play a central role in determining the coherence properties of alkali-metal vapors and the performance of alkali-metal magnetometers in external magnetic fields. In this work, we investigate how these collisions influence spin relaxation dynamics and magnetometric response using a generalized Bloch equation that fully accounts for the coupled evolution of spin polarizations in different hyperfine manifolds. Our results show that in the low-field regime, both SE and SD collisions contribute to the suppression of transverse spin relaxation and the slowdown of spin precession, whereas longitudinal relaxation depends weakly on the SE rate and is predominantly governed by SD interactions. Building on the established relationship between spin relaxation rates and magnetometric response, we further analyze how SE and SD collisions affect the performance of two representative magnetometer architectures: the spin-exchange relaxation-free (SERF) magnetometer and the magnetic-resonance Mx-type magnetometer. The SERF magnetometer's response is found to be primarily determined by the SD rate, with only minor dependence on the nuclear spin quantum number. In contrast, the magnetic-resonance Mx-type magnetometer's sensitivity is significantly affected by both the magnetic field strength and the SE rate. While the resonance linewidth decreases with reduced magnetic field, the associated measurement accuracy deteriorates markedly. Consequently, reliable magnetic field reconstruction is only achievable in the high-field regime, where the Larmor frequency greatly exceeds the SE rate.
|
Received: 04 November 2025
Revised: 23 December 2025
Accepted manuscript online: 14 January 2026
|
|
PACS:
|
34.50.-s
|
(Scattering of atoms and molecules)
|
| |
34.80.Nz
|
(Spin dependence of cross sections; polarized beam experiments)
|
| |
07.55.Ge
|
(Magnetometers for magnetic field measurements)
|
|
| Fund: This work was supported by the Science Challenge Project (Grant No. TZ2025017). |
Corresponding Authors:
Nan Zhao
E-mail: nzhao@csrc.ac.cn
|
Cite this article:
Feng Tang(汤丰), Jianjun Li(李建军), and Nan Zhao(赵楠) Effects of spin-destruction and spin-exchange collisions on alkali-metal relaxation and magnetometric response 2026 Chin. Phys. B 35 043401
|
[1] Zhang R, Xiao W, Ding Y D, Feng Y L, Peng X, Shen L, Sun C X, Wu T, Wu Y L, Yang Y C, Zheng Z Y, Zhang X Z, Chen J B and Guo H 2020 Sci. Adv. 6 eaba8792
[2] Limes M E, Foley E L, Kornack T W, Caliga S, McBride S, Braun A, Lee W, Lucivero V G and Romalis M V 2020 Phys. Rev. Appl. 14 011002
[3] Jiang M, Su H W, Chen Y F, Jiao M, Huang Y, Wang Y H, Rong X, Peng X H and Du J F 2025 Rep. Prog. Phys. 88 016401
[4] Wei K, Xu Z T, He Y X, Ma X L, Heng X, Huang X F, Quan W, Ji W, Liu J, Wang X P, Budker D and Fang J C 2025 Rep. Prog. Phys. 88 057801
[5] Happer W, Jau Y Y and Walker T 2010 Optically Pumped Atoms (Weinheim: Wiley-VCH)
[6] Appelt S, Ben-Amar Baranga A, Erickson C J, Romalis M V, Young A R and Happer W 1998 Phys. Rev. A 58 1412
[7] Budker D and Romalis M 2013 Optical Magnetometry (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
[8] Grosz A, Haji-Sheikh M J and Mukhopadhyay S C (eds.) 2017 High Sensitivity Magnetometers (Cham: Springer International Publishing)
[9] Savukov I M and Romalis M V 2005 Phys. Rev. A 71 023405
[10] Seltzer S J 2008 Developments in Alkali-Metal Atomic Magnetometry (Ph.D. Dissertation) (Princeton University, Princeton)
[11] Bhaskar N D, Camparo J, Happer W and Sharma A 1981 Phys. Rev. A 23 3048
[12] Katz O, Peleg O and Firstenberg O 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 113003
[13] Xiao W, Wu T, Peng X and Guo H 2021 Phys. Rev. A 103 043116
[14] Dikopoltsev M, Berrebi A, Levy U and Katz O 2025 Phys. Rev. Lett. 134 143201
[15] Mouloudakis K, Vasilakis G, Lucivero V G, Kong J, Kominis I K and Mitchell M W 2022 Phys. Rev. A 106 023112
[16] Tang F and Zhao N 2025 Phys. Rev. A 111 013103
[17] Happer W and Tam A C 1977 Phys. Rev. A 16 1877
[18] Katz O, Dikopoltsev M, Peleg O, Shuker M, Steinhauer J and Katz N 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 263004
[19] Kadlecek S, Anderson LWandWalker T 1998 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 402 208
[20] Ben-Amar Baranga A, Appelt S, Romalis M V, Erickson C J, Young A R, Cates G D and Happer W 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 2801
[21] Franz F A and Volk C 1982 Phys. Rev. A 26 85
[22] Walker T G 1989 Phys. Rev. A 40 4959
[23] Wagshul M E and Chupp T E 1994 Phys. Rev. A 49 3854
[24] Bhaskar N D, Pietras J, Camparo J, Happer W and Liran J 1980 Phys. Rev. Lett. 44 930
[25] Beverini N, Minguzzi P and Strumia F 1971 Phys. Rev. A 4 550
[26] Tang F, Li A X, Zhang K, Wang Y H and Zhao N 2019 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 52 205004
[27] Khersonskii V K, Moskalev A N and Varshalovich D A 1988 Quantum Theory of Angular Momentum (Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company)
[28] Happer W 1972 Rev. Mod. Phys. 44 169 |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|
