|
|
Inferring interactions of time-delayed dynamic networks by random state variable resetting |
Changbao Deng(邓长宝), Weinuo Jiang(蒋未诺), and Shihong Wang(王世红)† |
School of Sciences, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China |
|
|
Abstract Time delays exist widely in real systems, and time-delayed interactions can result in abundant dynamic behaviors and functions in dynamic networks. Inferring the time delays and interactions is challenging due to systematic nonlinearity, noises, a lack of information, and so on. Recently, Shi et al. proposed a random state variable resetting method to detect the interactions in a continuous-time dynamic network. By arbitrarily resetting the state variable of a driving node, the equivalent coupling functions of the driving node to any response node in the network can be reconstructed. In this paper, we introduce this method in time-delayed dynamic networks. To infer actual time delays, the nearest neighbor correlation (NNC) function for a given time delay is defined. The significant increments of NNC originate from the delayed effect. Based on the increments, the time delays can be reconstructed and the reconstruction errors depend on the sampling time interval. After time delays are accurately identified, the equivalent coupling functions can also be reconstructed. The numerical results have fully verified the validity of the theoretical analysis.
|
Received: 19 April 2021
Revised: 20 July 2021
Accepted manuscript online: 17 August 2021
|
PACS:
|
05.45.-a
|
(Nonlinear dynamics and chaos)
|
|
64.60.aq
|
(Networks)
|
|
89.75.Fb
|
(Structures and organization in complex systems)
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
Shihong Wang
E-mail: shwang@bupt.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Changbao Deng(邓长宝), Weinuo Jiang(蒋未诺), and Shihong Wang(王世红) Inferring interactions of time-delayed dynamic networks by random state variable resetting 2022 Chin. Phys. B 31 030502
|
[1] Newman M E J 2003 SIAM Review 23 094206 [2] Boccaletti S, Latora V, Moreno Y, Chavez M and Hwang D U 2006 Phys. Rep. 424 175308 [3] Timme M and Casadiego J 2014 J. Phys. A:Math. Theor. 47 343001 [4] Zhang L S, Gu W F, Hu G and Mi Y Y 2014 Chin. Phys. B 23 108902 [5] Sun J C 2016 Chin. Phys. Lett. 33 100503 [6] Zhang M, Wang X J, Jin L and Liao Z H 2020 Chin. Phys. B 29 096401 [7] Han F, Wang Z J and Fan H 2015 Chin. Phys. Lett. 32 040502 [8] Rihan F A, Alsakaji H J and Rajivganthi C 2020 Adv. Differ. Equ. 502 [9] Qian Y, Gao H, Yao C, Cui X and Ma J 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 108902 [10] Cao B, Gu H and Li Y 2021 Chin. Phys. B 11 050502 [11] Fan Y, Wang Z, Xia J and Shen H 2021 Chin. Phys. B 30 030202 [12] Garofalo M, Nieus T Massobrio P and Martinoia S 2009 Plos One e6482 [13] Zhou D, Xiao Y, Zhang Y, Xu Z and Cai D 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 054102 [14] Bianco-Martinez E, Rubido N, Antonopoulos C G and Baptista M S 2016 Chaos 26 043102 [15] Vicente R, Wibral M, Lindner M and Pipa G 2011 J. Comput. Neurosci. 30 45-67 [16] Zhang Z, Zheng Z, Niu H, Mi Y, Wu S and Hu G 2014 Phys. Rev. E 91 012814 [17] Ching Emily S C, Lai P Y and Leung C Y 2015 Phys. Rev. E 91 030801 [18] Chen Y, Zhang Z, Wang S and Hu G 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 44639 [19] Casadiego J and Timme M 2018 New J. Phys. 20 113031 [20] Wang W X, Lai Y C and Grebogi C 2016 Phys. Rep. 644 [21] Casadiego J, Nitzan M, Hallerberg S and Timme M 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 2192 [22] Chen Y, Zhang Z, Chen T, Wang S and Hu G 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 44639 [23] Zhang H F and Wang W X 2020 Acta Phy. Sin. 69 088906 (in Chinese) [24] Zhang Z Y, Chen Y, Mi Y Y and Hu G 2020 Acta Phy. Sin. 50 010502 (in Chinese) [25] Shi R, Hu G and Wang S 2019 Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 72 407-416 [26] Jiang W, Wang Z and Wang S 2021 Eur. Phys. J. B 94 138 [27] Zhang C, Chen Y and Hu G 2017 Phys. Lett. A 381 2502 [28] Shi R, Jiang W and Wang S 2020 Chaos 30 013138 [29] Levnajić Z and Pikovsky A 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 034101 [30] Bezruchko B P, Karavaev A S, Ponomarenko V I and Prokhorov M D 2001 Phys. Rev. E 64 056216 [31] Cimponeriu L, Rosenblum M and Pikovsky A 2004 Phys. Rev. E 70 046213 [32] Siefert M 2007 Phys. Rev. E 76 026215 [33] Ponomarenko V I and Prokhorov M D 2009 Phys. Rev. E 80 066206 [34] Zunino L, Soriano M C, Fischer I, Rosso O A and Mirasso C R 2010 Phys. Rev. E 82 046212 [35] Ma H, Leng S, Tao C, Ying X, Kurths J and Lai Y C 2017 Phys. Rev. E 96 012221 [36] Zhang Z, Chen Y, Mi Y and Hu G 2019 Phys. Rev. E 99 042311 [37] Shi R, Deng C and Wang S 2018 Europhys. Lett. 124 18002 [38] Deng C, Jiang W and Wang S 2021 Chaos 31 033146 [39] Lorenz E N 1963 J. Atmos. Sci. 20 130 [40] Hodgkin A L and Huxley A F 1952 J. Physiol. 117 500-544 |
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|