|
|
|
Filling gap of combination of gauge and analytical method in KFR-like theory |
| Jian Li(李健)1,2, Feng-Cai Ma(马凤才)3 |
1 School of Physical Science and Technology, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010021, China;
2 Department of Science, Shenyang Aerospace University, Shenyang 110036, China;
3 Department of Physics, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110036, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Bauer recently presented a formula for the ionization rate of a hydrogen atom in a strong linearly polarized laser field [J. Phys. B 49 145601 (2016)]. He started from the Keldysh probability amplitude in the length gauge and utilized Reiss's method in the velocity gauge. Instead, according to the Reiss probability amplitude in the velocity gauge and Keldysh's derivation for the length gauge, we derive a formula for the ionization rate of a ground-state hydrogen atom or a hydrogen-like atom in a strong linearly polarized laser field. We compare the numerical results of the total ionization rate and the photoelectron energy distribution calculated from our formula with the results from Keldysh, Reiss, and Bauer. We find that the apparent discrepancies in the ionization rate are caused not only by different gauges, but also by different analytical methods used to derive the ionization rate.
|
Received: 25 November 2019
Revised: 06 February 2020
Accepted manuscript online:
|
|
PACS:
|
32.80.Rm
|
(Multiphoton ionization and excitation to highly excited states)
|
| |
33.80.Rv
|
(Multiphoton ionization and excitation to highly excited states (e.g., Rydberg states))
|
|
| Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11274149 and 11304185) and the Program of Shenyang Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Materials and Technology, China (Grant No. F12-254-1-00). |
Corresponding Authors:
Jian Li, Feng-Cai Ma
E-mail: lijian@sau.edu.cn;fcma@lnu.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Jian Li(李健), Feng-Cai Ma(马凤才) Filling gap of combination of gauge and analytical method in KFR-like theory 2020 Chin. Phys. B 29 043205
|
| [1] |
Keldysh L V 1965 Sov. Phys. JETP 20 1307
|
| [2] |
Reiss H R 1980 Phys. Rev. A 22 1786
|
| [3] |
Faisal F H M 1973 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 6 89
|
| [4] |
Popruzhenko S V 2014 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 47 204001
|
| [5] |
Keldysh L V 2017 Phys. Usp. 60 1187
|
| [6] |
Reiss H R and Krainov V P 1994 Phys. Rev. A 50 R910
|
| [7] |
Reiss H R 1991 Radiat. Eff. Defect. S. 22 693
|
| [8] |
Zhao S F, Liu L and Zhou X 2014 Opt. Commun. 313 74
|
| [9] |
Awasthi M, Petretti S, Vanne Y V, Saenz A, Castro A and Decleva P 2009 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 194 022064
|
| [10] |
Awasthi M, Vanne Y V, Saenz A, Castro A and Decleva P 2008 Phys. Rev. A 77 0634403
|
| [11] |
Kobe D H 1982 Am. J. Phys. 50 128
|
| [12] |
Forre M and Simonsen A S 2016 Phys. Rev. A 93 013423
|
| [13] |
Faisal F H M 1987 Phys. Lett. A 125 200
|
| [14] |
Vanne Y V and Saenz A 2009 Phys. Rev. A 79 023421
|
| [15] |
Bechler A and Slěczka M 2013 Phys. Rev. 87 025402
|
| [16] |
Dong H M, Han K and Xu W 2014 J. Appl. Phys. 115 063503
|
| [17] |
Dick R 2016 Phys. Rev. A 94 062118
|
| [18] |
Chang L N, Minic D, Roman A, Sun C and Takeuchi T 2016 Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 31 1630012
|
| [19] |
Bauer D, Milosevic D B and Becker W 2005 Phys. Rev. A 72 23415
|
| [20] |
McGuire J H, Nagy L, Wang J, Hino K and Amusia M Y 1995 Acta Phys. Hung A 1 121
|
| [21] |
Shakeshaft R 1988 Z. Phys. D: At. Mol. Clusters 8 47
|
| [22] |
Gazibegović-Busuladžić A and Milošević D B 2007 Opt. Commun. 275 116
|
| [23] |
Grynberg G and Giacobino E 1979 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 12 93
|
| [24] |
Bauer J H 2016 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 49 145601
|
| [25] |
Mishima K, Hayashi M, Yi J, Lin S H, Selzleand H L and Schlag E W 2002 Phys. Rev. A. 66 033401
|
| [26] |
Bauer J 2006 Phys. Rev. A 73 023421
|
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|
