|
|
Meshless analysis of an improved element-free Galerkin method for linear and nonlinear elliptic problems |
Yao-Zong Tang(唐耀宗)1, Xiao-Lin Li(李小林)2 |
1 College of Mathematics and Statistics, Kashgar University, Kashgar 844000, China; 2 College of Mathematics Science, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing 400047, China |
|
|
Abstract We first give a stabilized improved moving least squares (IMLS) approximation, which has better computational stability and precision than the IMLS approximation. Then, analysis of the improved element-free Galerkin method is provided theoretically for both linear and nonlinear elliptic boundary value problems. Finally, numerical examples are given to verify the theoretical analysis.
|
Received: 25 October 2016
Revised: 30 November 2016
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
02.60.Cb
|
(Numerical simulation; solution of equations)
|
|
02.60.Lj
|
(Ordinary and partial differential equations; boundary value problems)
|
|
02.30.Em
|
(Potential theory)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11471063), the Chongqing Research Program of Basic Research and Frontier Technology, China (Grant No. cstc2015jcyjBX0083), and the Educational Commission Foundation of Chongqing City, China (Grant No. KJ1600330). |
Corresponding Authors:
Xiao-Lin Li
E-mail: lxlmath@163.com
|
Cite this article:
Yao-Zong Tang(唐耀宗), Xiao-Lin Li(李小林) Meshless analysis of an improved element-free Galerkin method for linear and nonlinear elliptic problems 2017 Chin. Phys. B 26 030203
|
[1] |
Cheng Y M 2015 Meshless Methods (Beijing: Science Press) (in Chinese)
|
[2] |
Liu G R 2009 Meshfree Methods: Moving Beyond the Finite Element Method (Boca Raton: CRC Press)
|
[3] |
Lei J M and Peng X Y 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 020202
|
[4] |
Lancaster P and Salkauskas K 1981 Math. Comput. 37 141
|
[5] |
Wang Y C and Li X L 2014 Chin. Phys. B 23 090202
|
[6] |
Li X L and Li S L 2013 Chin. Phys. B 22 080204
|
[7] |
Cheng Y M and Li J H 2005 Acta Phys. Sin. 54 4463 (in Chinese)
|
[8] |
Ren H P, Cheng Y M and Zhang W 2010 Sci. China: Phys. Mech. Astron. 53 758
|
[9] |
Cheng Y M, Bai F N, Liu C and Peng M J 2016 Int. J. Comput. Mater. Sci. Eng. 5 1650023
|
[10] |
Sun F X, Wang J F, Cheng Y M and Huang A X 2015 Appl. Numer. Math. 98 79
|
[11] |
Deng Y J, Liu C, Peng M J and Cheng Y M 2015 Int. J. Appl. Mech. 7 1550017
|
[12] |
Cheng Y M, Bai F N and Peng M J 2014 Appl. Math. Model. 38 5187
|
[13] |
Wang J F, Sun F X and Cheng Y M 2012 Chin. Phys. B 21 090204
|
[14] |
Li X L 2015 Appl. Math. Model. 39 3116
|
[15] |
Chen S S, Wang J and Li Q H 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 040203
|
[16] |
Lu Y Y, Belytschko T and Gu L 1994 Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 113 397
|
[17] |
Cheng Y M and Peng M J 2005 Sci. China: Phys. Mech. Astron. 48 641
|
[18] |
Liew K M, Cheng Y M and Kitipornchai S 2006 Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 65 1310
|
[19] |
Li X L and Zhang S G 2016 Appl. Math. Model. 40 2875
|
[20] |
Mirzaei D, Schaback R and Dehghan M 2012 IMA J. Numer. Anal. 32 983
|
[21] |
Li X L and Li S L 2016 Comput. Math. Appl. 72 1515
|
[22] |
Li X L and Wang Q Q 2016 Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem. 73 21
|
[23] |
Liu W K, Jun S and Zhang Y F 1995 Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 20 1081
|
[24] |
Liu W K, Li S and Belytschko T 1997 Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 143 113
|
[25] |
Belytschko T, Krongauz Y, Organ D, Fleming M and Krysl P 1996 Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 139 3
|
[26] |
Jin X Z, Li G and Aluru N R 2001 Comput. Model. Eng. Sci. 2 447
|
[27] |
Zhang Z, Liew K M, Cheng Y M and Li Y Y 2008 Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem. 32 241
|
[28] |
Zhang Z, Liew K M and Cheng Y M 2008 Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem. 32 100
|
[29] |
Zhang Z, Wang J F, Cheng Y M and Liew K M 2013 Sci. China: Phys. Mech. Astron. 56 1568
|
[30] |
Zhang Z, Hao S Y, Liew K M and Cheng Y M 2013 Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem. 37 1576
|
[31] |
Zhang L W, Deng Y J and Liew KM 2014 Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem. 40 181
|
[32] |
Peng M J, Li R X and Cheng Y M 2014 Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem. 40 104
|
[33] |
Zhang Z, Li D M, Cheng Y M and Liew K M 2012 Acta Mech. Sin. 28 808
|
[34] |
Cheng R J and Wei Q 2013 Chin. Phys. B 22 060209
|
[35] |
Cheng R J and Cheng Y M 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 020203
|
[36] |
Li X L, Chen H and Wang Y 2015 Appl. Math. Comput. 262 56
|
[37] |
Li X L and Zhu J L 2009 J. Comput. Appl. Math. 230 314
|
[38] |
Li X L 2011 Appl. Numer. Math. 61 1237
|
[39] |
Li X L 2016 Appl. Numer. Math. 99 77
|
[40] |
Cheng R J and Cheng Y M 2008 Acta Phys. Sin. 57 6037 (in Chinese)
|
[41] |
Cheng R J and Cheng Y M 2011 Acta Phys. Sin. 60 070206 (in Chinese)
|
[42] |
Li X L, Zhang S G, Wang Y and Chen H 2016 Comput. Math. Appl. 71 1655
|
[43] |
Mathews J H and Fink K K 2004 Numerical Methods using MATLAB (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall)
|
[44] |
Li X L and Zhu J L 2009 Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem. 33 322
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|