|
|
Improved frequency standard via weighted graph states |
Xue Peng (薛鹏) |
Department of Physics, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China |
|
|
Abstract We study the spin squeezing property of weighted graph states, which can be used to improve sensitivity in interferometry. We study the time evolution of spin squeezing under local decoherence acting independently on each qubit. Based on the analysis, the spin squeezing of the weighted graph states is somehow robust in the presence of decoherence and the decoherence limit in the improvement of the interferometric sensitivity is still achievable. Furthermore, one can obtain the optimal improvement of sensitivity by tuning the weighted of each edges of the weighted graph state.
|
Received: 14 February 2012
Revised: 19 April 2012
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
03.65.Yz
|
(Decoherence; open systems; quantum statistical methods)
|
|
03.67.Pp
|
(Quantum error correction and other methods for protection against decoherence)
|
|
06.20.Dk
|
(Measurement and error theory)
|
|
06.30.Ft
|
(Time and frequency)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11004029 and 11174052), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China (Grant No. BK2010422), the Ph. D. Program of the Ministry of Education of China, the Excellent Young Teachers Program of Southeast University and the National Basic Research Development Program of China (Grant No. 2011CB921203). |
Corresponding Authors:
Xue Peng
E-mail: gnep.eux@gmail.com
|
Cite this article:
Xue Peng (薛鹏) Improved frequency standard via weighted graph states 2012 Chin. Phys. B 21 100306
|
[1] |
Caves C M 1981 Phys. Rev. D 23 1693
|
[2] |
Yurke B 1986 Phys. Rev. Lett. 56 1515
|
[3] |
Kitagawa M and Ueda M 1991 Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 1852
|
[4] |
Ulam-Orgikh D and Kitagawa M 2001 Phys. Rev. A 64 052106
|
[5] |
Wineland D J, Bollinger J J, Itano W M, Moore F L and Heinzen D J 1992 Phys. Rev. A 46 R6797
|
[6] |
Cappellaro P and Lukin M D 2009 Phys. Rev. A 80 032311
|
[7] |
Kitagawa M and Ueda M 1993 Phys. Rev. A 47 5138
|
[8] |
Jacobson J, Björt G, Chuang I and Yamamoto Y 1995 Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 4835
|
[9] |
Huelga S F, Macchiavello C, Pellizzari T, Ekert A K, Plenio M B and Cirac J I 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 3865
|
[10] |
Biregel H J and Raussendorf R 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 910
|
[11] |
Hein M, Dür W and Briegel H J 2004 Phys. Rev. A 69 062311
|
[12] |
Rosenkranz M and Jaksch D 2009 Phys. Rev. A 79 022103
|
[13] |
Agarwal G S and Puri R P 1994 Phys. Rev. A 49 4968
|
[14] |
Wang X and Sanders B C 2003 Phys. Rev. A 68 012101
|
[15] |
Pezzé L and Smerzi A 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 100401
|
[16] |
Ramsey N F 1963 Molecular Beams (London: Oxford University Press)
|
[17] |
André A and Lukin M D 2002 Phys. Rev. A 65 053819
|
[18] |
Stockton J K, Geremia J M, Doherty A C and Mabuchi H 2003 Phys. Rev. A 67 022112
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|