Chen Lin-Hong (陈林红)a, Wu Mei (吴枚)b, Shang Ren-Cheng (尚仁成)a
a Center for Astrophysics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China; b Laboratory of High-Energy Astrophysics, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, China
The structures of optically-thick accretion discs with radial advection have been investigated by the iteration and integration algorithms. The advective cooling term changes mostly the inner part of disc solution, and even results in an optically-thick advection-dominated accretion flow (ADAF). Three distinct branches-the outer Shakura-Sunyaev disc (SSD), the inner ADAF and the middle transition layer-are found for a super-Eddington disc. The SSD-ADAF transition radius can be estimated as 18$(\dot{M}/\dot{M}_E)R_G$ where RG is the Schwarzschild radius, $\dot{M}$ is the mass accretion rate and $\dot{M}_E$ is the Eddington accretion rate. SSD solutions calculated with the iteration and integration methods are identical, while ADAF solutions obtained by these two methods differ greatly. Detailed algorithms and their differences have been analysed. The iteration algorithm is not self-consistent, since it implies that the dimensionless advection factor $\xi$ is invariant, but in the inner ADAF region the variation of $\xi$ is not negligible. The integration algorithm is always effective for the whole region of an optically-thick disc if the accretion rate is no smaller than 10-4$\dot{M}_E$. For optically-thin discs, the validity of these two algorithms is different. We suggest that the integration method be employed to calculate the global solution of a disc model without assuming $\xi$ to be a constant. We also discuss its application to the emergent continuum spectrum in order to explain observational facts.
Received: 10 April 2002
Revised: 13 August 2002
Accepted manuscript online:
PACS:
04.70.Dy
(Quantum aspects of black holes, evaporation, thermodynamics)
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.