|
|
|
Co-optimization of linear gain and dynamic range for atomic superheterodyne receivers based on homodyne readout |
| Chuan Qu(瞿川), Dongqin Guo(郭东琴), and Jian Zhang(张剑)† |
| Information Engineering University, Zhengzhou 450000, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Rydberg-atom-based superheterodyne receivers integrate self-calibration, high sensitivity, a wide operational frequency range, and phase/frequency resolved detection capabilities, demonstrating broad application prospects as next-generation microwave receivers. Linear gain and linear dynamic range (LDR) are critical metrics for assessing receiver sensitivity and demodulation fidelity, respectively. We numerically solve the four-level master equation and then employ particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm to co-optimize linear gain and LDR in atomic superheterodyne receivers based on balanced homodyne detection. Further, we systematically account for dominant dephasing mechanisms in the simulation, encompassing spontaneous decay, transit dephasing, collision dephasing, laser linewidth dephasing, and Doppler averaging. Homodyne readout utilizes both the real and imaginary parts of polarizability for sensing. In the case of the photon shot noise limit, its signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) expression resembles that of direct optical-intensity readout. However, the inherent coherent subtraction operation in homodyne detection significantly suppresses common-mode noise, while appropriately increasing the reference beam power enhances the gain in practical experiments. Indeed, this co-optimization problem, characterized by a high-dimensional variable space, two objectives, and non-convexity, is well-suited for solution by PSO. In addition, probe and coupling detuning contribute equivalently to polarizability and compensate for each other owing to Doppler averaging, thereby reducing the optimization variable space by one. By adopting a product form of linear gain and LDR as the fitness function, the PSO achieves rapid convergence. Here, the effectiveness of the PSO results is verified via the total harmonic distortion (THD). The relative error-based LDR calculation method we proposed efficiently measures receiver response linearity with consuming fewer computational resources. This research is expected to offer valuable insights into enhancing the performance of Rydberg-atom-based superheterodyne receivers.
|
Received: 18 April 2025
Revised: 26 June 2025
Accepted manuscript online: 27 June 2025
|
|
PACS:
|
32.80.Ee
|
(Rydberg states)
|
| |
42.50.Gy
|
(Effects of atomic coherence on propagation, absorption, and Amplification of light; electromagnetically induced transparency and Absorption)
|
| |
84.30.Qi
|
(Modulators and demodulators; discriminators, comparators, mixers, limiters, and compressors)
|
|
| Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 62331024 and 62571549) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2022YFB2802804). |
Corresponding Authors:
Jian Zhang
E-mail: Zhang_xinda.@126.com
|
Cite this article:
Chuan Qu(瞿川), Dongqin Guo(郭东琴), and Jian Zhang(张剑) Co-optimization of linear gain and dynamic range for atomic superheterodyne receivers based on homodyne readout 2026 Chin. Phys. B 35 013202
|
[1] Sedlacek J A, Schwettmann A, Kübler H, Löw R, Pfau T and Shaffer J P 2012 Nat. Phys. 8 819 [2] Holloway C L, Simons M T, Gordon J A, Dienstfrey A, Anderson D A and Raithel G 2017 J. Appl. Phys. 121 233106 [3] Schlossberger N, Prajapati N, Berweger S, Rotunno A P, Artusio- Glimpse A B, Simons M T, Sheikh A A, Norrgard E B, Eckel S P and Holloway C L 2024 Nat. Rev. Phys. 6 606 [4] Zhang H, Ma Y, Liao K, Yang W, Liu Z, Ding D, Yan H, Li W and Zhang L 2024 Sci. Bull. 69 1515 [5] Meyer D H, Hill J C, Kunz P D and Cox K C 2023 Phys. Rev. Appl. 19 014025 [6] Cai Y, Shi S, Zhou Y, Li Y, Yu J, Li W and Li L 2023 Phys. Rev. Appl. 19 044079 [7] Jing M, Hu Y, Ma J, Zhang H, Zhang L, Xiao L and Jia S 2020 Nat. Phys. 16 911 [8] Li H, Hu J, Bai J, Shi M, Jiao Y, Zhao J and Jia S 2022 Opt. Express 30 13522 [9] Anderson D A, Sapiro R E and Raithel G 2020 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 69 2455 [10] Simons M T, Haddab A H, Gordon J A, Novotny D and Holloway C L 2019 IEEE Access 7 164975 [11] Holloway C L, Simons M T, Gordon J A and Novotny D 2019 IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. 18 1853 [12] Nowosielski J, Jastrzebski M, Halavach P, Łukanowski K, Jarzyna M, Mazelanik M, Wasilewski W and Parniak M 2024 Opt. Express 32 30027 [13] Zhang L H, Liu Z K, Liu B, Zhang Z Y, Guo G C, Ding D S and Shi B S 2022 Phys. Rev. Appl. 18 014033 [14] Elgee P K, Cox K C, Hill J C, Kunz P D and Meyer D H 2024 Phys. Rev. Appl. 22 064012 [15] Fan H, Kumar S, Daschner R, Kübler H and Shaffer J 2014 Opt. Lett. 39 3030 [16] Yang W, Jing M, Zhang H, Zhang L, Xiao L and Jia S 2023 Phys. Rev. Appl. 19 064021 [17] Kumar S, Fan H, Kübler H, Sheng J and Shaffer J P 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 42981 [18] Meyer D H, Castillo Z A, Cox K C and Kunz P D 2020 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 53 034001 [19] Cronin A D, Schmiedmayer J and Pritchard D E 2009 Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 1051 [20] Wu F, An Q, Sun Z and Fu Y 2023 Phys. Rev. A 107 043108 [21] Meyer D H, O’Brien C, Fahey D P, Cox K C and Kunz P D 2021 Phys. Rev. A 104 043103 [22] Chen Y, Guo X, Yuen C, Zhao Y, Guan Y L, See C M S, Débbah M and Hanzo L 2025 (Preprint arXiv:2501.11842 [cs.IT]) [23] Wu Y, Xiao D, Zhang H and Yan S 2025 Chin. Phys. B 34 013201 [24] Wang D, Tan D and Liu L 2018 Soft Comput. 22 387 [25] Robertson E J, Sibalić N, Potvliege R M and Jones M P 2021 Comput. Phys. Commun. 261 107814 [26] Cao Y, Yang W, Zhang H, Jing M, Li W, Zhang L, Xiao L and Jia S 2022 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 39 2032 [27] Fan H, Kumar S, Sedlacek J, Kübler H, Karimkashi S and Shaffer J P 2015 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 48 202001 [28] Bai Z, Adams C S, Huang G and LiW2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 263605 [29] Hanley R K, Bounds A D, Huillery P, Keegan N C, Faoro R, Bridge E M, Weatherill K J and Jones M P 2017 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 50 115002 [30] Bussey L W, Kale Y B, Winter S, Burton F A, Lien Y H, Bongs K and Constantinou C 2024 EPJ Quantum Technol. 11 77 [31] Miller B N, Meyer D H, Virtanen T, O’Brien C M and Cox K C 2024 Comput. Phys. Commun. 294 108952 |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|