|
|
|
Multi-party semi-quantum private comparison protocol of size relation based on two-dimensional Bell states |
| Bing Wang(王冰)1,2, Li-Hua Gong(龚黎华)1,3, and San-Qiu Liu(刘三秋)1,2,† |
1 Jiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Fusion and Information Control, Department of Physics, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China;
2 School of Physics and Materials, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China;
3 Department of Electronic Information Engineering, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Currently, all quantum private comparison protocols based on two-dimensional quantum states can only compare equality, via using high-dimensional quantum states that it is possible to compare the size relation in existing work. In addition, it is difficult to manipulate high-dimensional quantum states under the existing conditions of quantum information processing, leading to low practicality and engineering feasibility of protocols for comparing size relation. Considering this situation, we propose an innovative protocol. The proposed protocol can make size comparison by exploiting more manageable two-dimensional Bell states, which significantly enhances its feasibility with current quantum technologies. Simultaneously, the proposed protocol enables multiple participants to compare their privacies with the semi-quantum model. The communication process of the protocol is simulated on the IBM Quantum Experience platform to verify its effectiveness. Security analysis shows that the proposed protocol can withstand common attacks while preserving the privacies of all participants. Thus, the devised protocol may provide an important reference for implementation of quantum private size comparison protocols.
|
Received: 27 March 2024
Revised: 15 August 2024
Accepted manuscript online: 27 August 2024
|
|
PACS:
|
03.67.Dd
|
(Quantum cryptography and communication security)
|
| |
03.67.Hk
|
(Quantum communication)
|
| |
03.67.-a
|
(Quantum information)
|
| |
03.67.Ac
|
(Quantum algorithms, protocols, and simulations)
|
|
| Fund: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 62161025), the Project of Scientific and Technological Innovation Base of Jiangxi Province (Grant No. 20203CCD46008), and the Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Fusion and Information Control (Grant No. 20171BCD40005). |
Corresponding Authors:
San-Qiu Liu
E-mail: sqlgroup@ncu.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Bing Wang(王冰), Li-Hua Gong(龚黎华), and San-Qiu Liu(刘三秋) Multi-party semi-quantum private comparison protocol of size relation based on two-dimensional Bell states 2024 Chin. Phys. B 33 110303
|
[1] Yao A C 1982 Proceedings of 23rd IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (SFCS’08), November 3–5, 1982, Chicago, IL, USA, pp. 160–164
[2] Boudot F, Schoenmakers B and Traore 2001 Discrete Appl. Math. 111 23
[3] Mayers D 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 3414
[4] Lo H K 1997 Phys. Rev. A 56 1154
[5] Colbeck R 2007 Phys. Rev. A 76 062308
[6] Wang Q L, Sun H X and Huang W 2014 Quantum Inf. Process. 13 2375
[7] Hung S M, Huang S L, Hwang T and Kao S H 2017 Quantum Inf. Process. 16 36
[8] Huang S L, Hwang T and Gope P 2015 Quantum Inf. Process. 14 4225
[9] Li J, Wang Z, Ye C Q and Che F T 2023 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 62 196
[10] Huang X, Chang Y, Cheng W, Hou M and Zhang S B 2022 Chin. Phys. B 31 040303
[11] Jia H Y, Wen Q Y, Song T T and Gao F 2011 Opt. Commun. 284 545
[12] Naseri M 2009 Opt. Commun. 282 1939
[13] He L B, Huang L S, Yang W, Xu R and Han D Q 2012 Quantum Inf. Process. 11 135969
[14] Chen X B, Xu G, Yang Y X and Wen Q Y 2010 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 49 2793
[15] Hillery M, Ziman M, Buzek V and Bielikova M 2006 Phys. Lett. A 349 75
[16] Bonanome M, Buzek V, Hillery M and Ziman M 2011 Phys. Rev. A 84 022331
[17] Liu W J, Liu C, Chen H W, Li Z Q and Liu Z H 2014 Commun. Theor. Phys. 62 210
[18] Liu W J, Liu C, Wang H B, Liu J F, Wang F and Yuan X M 2014 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 53 1804
[19] Gu J, Ho C Y and Hwang T 2018 Quantum Inf. Process. 17 23
[20] Lin S, Sun Y, Liu X and Yao Z 2013 Quantum Inf. Process. 12 559
[21] Guo F Z, Gao F, Qin S J, Zhang J and Wen Q Y 2013 Quantum Inf. Process. 12 2793
[22] Zhang W W, Li D, Zhang K J and Zuo H J 2013 Quantum Inf. Process. 12 2241
[23] Yu C H, Guo G D and Lin S 2013 Phys. Scr. 88 065013
[24] Luo Q B, Yang G W, She K, Niu W N and Wang Y Q 2014 Quantum Inf. Process. 13 2343
[25] Ye C Q and Ye T Y 2018 Quantum Inf. Process. 17 252
[26] Cao H, Ma W P, Lu L D, He Y F and Liu G 2019 Quantum Inf. Process. 18 287
[27] Wang B, Gong L H and Liu S Q 2022 Front. Phys. 10 981376
[28] Lian J Y, Li X and Ye T Y 2023 Phys. Scr. 98 035011
[29] Boyer M, Kenigsberg D and Mor T 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 140501
[30] Boyer M, Gelles R, Kenigsberg D and Mor T 2009 Phys. Rev. A 79 032341
[31] Ye T Y, Geng M J, Xu T J and C Y 2022 Quantum Inf. Process. 21 123
[32] Zhou N R, Xu Q D, Du N S and Gong L H 2021 Quantum Inf. Process. 20 124
[33] Luo Q B, Li X Y, Yang G W and Lin C 2022 Quantum Inf. Process. 21 257
[34] Lian J Y, Li X and Ye T Y 2023 EPJ Quantum Technol. 10 10
[35] Wang B, Gong L H and Liu S Q 2023 Laser Phys. Lett. 20 105202
[36] Ye T Y and Lian J Y 2023 Physica A 611 128424
[37] Cozzolino D, Da Lio B, Bacco D and Oxenlowe L 2019 Adv. Quantum Technol. 2 1900038
[38] Xu Q D, Chen H Y, Gong L H and Zhou N R 2020 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 59 1798
[39] He Z B and Lou X P 2023 Quantum Inf. Process. 22 150
[40] Gong L H, Chen Z Y, Qin L G and Huang J H 2023 Adv. Quantum Technol. 6 2300097
[41] IBM Quantum Experience
[42] Wang Z Y, Wu F L, Peng Z Y and Liu S Y 2022 Chin. Phys. B 31 070302
[43] Kou T Y, Che B C, Dou Z, Chen X B, Lai Y P and Li J 2022 Chin. Phys. B 31 060307
[44] Gong L H, Ye Z J, Liu C and Zhou S 2024 Laser Phys. Lett. 21 035207
[45] Gong L H, Li M L, Cao H and Wang B 2024 Laser Phys. Lett. 21 055209
[46] Wu W Q, Guo L N and Xie M Z 2022 Front. Phys. 10 1048325
[47] Wang B, Liu S Q and Gong L H 2022 Chin. Phys. B 31 010302 |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|
