|
|
|
Dynamic decision and its complex dynamics analysis of low-carbon supply chain considering risk-aversion under carbon tax policy |
| Jin-Chai Lin(林金钗)1,†, Ru-Guo Fan(范如国)2, Yuan-Yuan Wang(王圆缘)2, and Kang Du(杜康)2 |
1 Management School, Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing 400054, China;
2 Economics and Management School, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract This study establishes a low-carbon supply chain game model under the centralized decision situation and the decentralized decision situation considering the manufacturer risk-aversion behavior, and discusses the influence of the manufacturer risk-aversion behavior on the optimal decision, profit, coordination, and complex dynamics of the supply chain. We find that comparing with the risk-neutral decentralized decision, the increase of manufacturer's risk tolerance attitude can narrow the gap between the supply chain profit and the centralized decision, but it will further reduce the carbon emission reduction level. The increase of risk tolerance of the manufacturer and carbon tax will narrow the stable region of the system. Under this situation, the manufacturer should carefully adjust parameters to prevent the system from losing stability, especially the adjustment parameters for carbon emission reduction level. When the system is in a chaotic state, the increase of carbon tax rate makes the system show more complex dynamic characteristics. Under the chaotic state, it is difficult for the manufacturer to make correct price decision and carbon emission reduction strategy for the next period, which damages its profit, but increases the profit of the retailer and the supply chain. Finally, the carbon emission reduction cost-sharing contract is proposed to improve the carbon emission reduction level and the supply chain efficiency, achieving Pareto improvement. The stability region of the system is larger than that in the centralized decision situation, but the increase of the cost sharing coefficient will reduce the stability of the system in the decentralized decision-making situation.
|
Received: 21 March 2023
Revised: 23 April 2023
Accepted manuscript online: 05 May 2023
|
|
PACS:
|
05.45.-a
|
(Nonlinear dynamics and chaos)
|
| |
05.45.Pq
|
(Numerical simulations of chaotic systems)
|
|
| Fund: Project supported by the Social Science Planning Project of Chongqing, China (Grant No. 2022BS069), the Science and Technology Research Project of Chongqing Education Committee, China (Grant No. KJQN202201140), the National Social Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 20&ZD155), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 72061003). |
Corresponding Authors:
Jin-Chai Lin
E-mail: jc_lin@cqut.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Jin-Chai Lin(林金钗), Ru-Guo Fan(范如国), Yuan-Yuan Wang(王圆缘), and Kang Du(杜康) Dynamic decision and its complex dynamics analysis of low-carbon supply chain considering risk-aversion under carbon tax policy 2023 Chin. Phys. B 32 100502
|
[1] Zhang J W 2021 China Today 70 57
[2] Ho T H, Su X M and Wu Y Z 2014 Prod. Oper. Manag. 23 161
[3] Qi Q, Zhang R Q and Bai Q G 2021 Comput. Ind. Eng. 162 107783
[4] Sarkar S and Bhala S 2021 Eur. J. Oper. Res. 295 140
[5] Wu M, Zhu S X and Teunter R H 2014 Int. J. Prod. Econ. 156 13
[6] Zhu Y Y, Xia C Y, Wang Z and Chen Z Q 2022 IEEE. Trans. Netw. Sci. Eng. 9 2450
[7] Li X P, Han W W, Yang W J, Wang J, Xia C Y, Li H J and Shi Y 2022 Physica A 594 127055
[8] Liu M W, Liu Y Q and Fu Q L 2022 Chin. J. Manag. Sci. 30 131
[9] Ji J N, Zhang Z Y and Yang L 2017 J. Clean Prod. 141 852
[10] Wang J, Cheng X X, Jiang Y S and Dong Z M 2021 Chin. J. Manag. Sci 29 128
[11] Huang D and Zhang J L 2021 Chin. J. Manag. Sci. 29 57
[12] Lu Z N and Yi S S 2019 Eco. Econ. 35 75
[13] Shi S Y, Sun J C and Deng F 2021 Oper. Res. Manag. Sci. 30 1
[14] Wang H P, Yan X C, Zhao D and Li Y 2022 Oper. Res. Manag. Sci. Forthcoming
[15] Shang C, Guan Z and Mi L 2022 Comput. Eng. Appl. 58 309
[16] Liu L and Li F T 2022 J. Ind. Eng. Eng. Manag. 36 159
[17] Niederhoff J A and Kouvelis P 2019 Eur. J. Oper. Res. 277 1060
[18] Chen X, Shum S and Simchi-Levi D 2014 Prod. Oper. Manag. 23 379
[19] Li B and Jiang Y S 2019 J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 47 104
[20] Bai Q G, Shi B Z and Xu J T 2019 Syst. Eng. 37 86
[21] Yan N N, He X L and Liu Y 2019 Omega 88 162
[22] Yan N N, Jin X Y, Zhong H C and Xu X 2020 Int. J. Prod. Econ. 227 107665
[23] Xi X and Zhang J X 2020 Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 140 110220
[24] Tian Y, Ma J H, Xie L, et al. 2020 Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 132 109576
[25] Ma J H, Tian Y, Xu T T, Koivumaki T and Xu Y Q 2022 Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 160 112131
[26] Li Q X, Shi M N and Huang Y M 2019 Int J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health 16 1978
[27] Xie L, Ma J H and Han H S 2017 Appl. Math. Model. 55 484
[28] Yang H X and Chen W B 2018 Omega 78 179
[29] Choi T M, Ma C, Shen B and Sun Q 2019 Omage 88 150
[30] Ding J F, Chen W D and Fu S S 2022 Syst. Eng. Theory Pract. 42 637 |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|
