PHYSICS OF GASES, PLASMAS, AND ELECTRIC DISCHARGES |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Neoclassical tearing mode stabilization by electron cyclotron current drive for HL-2M tokamak |
Jing-Chun Li(李景春)1,2,†, Jia-Qi Dong(董家齐)3, Xiao-Quan Ji(季小全)3, and You-Jun Hu(胡友俊)4 |
1 Department of Earth and Space Sciences, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518000, China; 2 University of California, Irvine, California 92697, USA; 3 Southwestern Institute of Physics, Chengdu 610041, China; 4 Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China |
|
|
Abstract Investigation of neoclassical tearing mode and its suppression by electron cyclotron current drive (ECCD) has been carried out in HL-2M tokamak. The current driving capability of the electron cyclotron wave is evaluated. It is found that the deposition location can be effectively controlled by changing the poloidal angle. The validation of electron cyclotron wave heating and current driving has been demonstrated for the upper launcher port. We show that 3.0 MW and 2.5 MW modulated ECCD can completely stabilize (2,1) and (3,2) NTMs, respectively. The non-modulated ECCD, radial misalignment as well as current profile broadening have deleterious effect on the NTM stabilization. The time required for suppression of (3,2) mode is shorter than that required for the suppression of (2,1) mode. Moreover, the time needed for complete stabilization at different initial island width has been quantitatively presented and analyzed.
|
Received: 12 March 2021
Revised: 19 April 2021
Accepted manuscript online: 26 April 2021
|
PACS:
|
52.35.Hr
|
(Electromagnetic waves (e.g., electron-cyclotron, Whistler, Bernstein, upper hybrid, lower hybrid))
|
|
52.55.Fa
|
(Tokamaks, spherical tokamaks)
|
|
52.55.Wq
|
(Current drive; helicity injection)
|
|
52.35.Py
|
(Macroinstabilities (hydromagnetic, e.g., kink, fire-hose, mirror, ballooning, tearing, trapped-particle, flute, Rayleigh-Taylor, etc.))
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant Nos. 2018YFE0303102, 2018YFE0301100, and 2017YFE0301702), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11905109 and 11947238), U.S. DOE SciDAC ISEP, users with Excellence Program (on EAST tokamak) of Hefei Science Center CAS under (Grant No. 2021HSC-UE017), and the Center for Computational Science and Engineering of Southern University of Science and Technology. |
Corresponding Authors:
Jing-Chun Li
E-mail: lijc@sustech.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Jing-Chun Li(李景春), Jia-Qi Dong(董家齐), Xiao-Quan Ji(季小全), and You-Jun Hu(胡友俊) Neoclassical tearing mode stabilization by electron cyclotron current drive for HL-2M tokamak 2021 Chin. Phys. B 30 075203
|
[1] Sauter O, LaHaye R J, Chang Z, et al. 1997 Phys. Plasmas 4 1654 [2] La Haye R J, Lao L L, Strait E J and Taylor T S 1997 Nucl. Fusion 37 397 [3] Giruzzi G, Zabiego M, Gianakon T A, Garbet X, Cardinali A and Bernabei S 1999 Nucl. Fusion 39 107 [4] Li J C, Xiao C J, Lin Z H and Wang K J 2017 Phys. Plasmas 24 082508 [5] Zohma H, Gantenbeinb G, Gudea A, Gnter S, Leuterera F, Marascheka M, P. Meskatb J, Suttropa W, Yu Q and ASDEX Upgrade Team 2001 Nucl. Fusion 41 197 [6] Poli E, Tardini G, Zohm H, Fable E, Farina D, Figini L, Marushchenko N B and Porte L 2013 Nucl. Fusion 53 013011 [7] Pinsker R I 2001 Phys. Plasmas 8 1219 [8] Wei W, Ding B J, Peysson Y, Decker J, Li M H, Zhang X J, Wang X J and Zhang L 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 015201 [9] Fitzpatrick R 1993 Nucl. Fusion 33 1049 [10] Yu Q, Gunter S and Lackner K 2018 Nucl. Fusion 58 054003 [11] Prater R 2004 Phys. Plasma 11 2349 [12] Gantenbein G, Zohm H, Giruzzi G, Gunter S, Leuterer F, Maraschek M, Meskat J, Yu Q, ASDEX Upgrade Team and ECRH-Group 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 1242 [13] Petty C C, La Haye R J, Luce T C, Humphreys D A, Hyatt A W, Lohr J, Prater R, Strait E J and Wade M R 2004 Nucl. Fusion 44 243 [14] Isayama A, Kamada Y, Ozeki T, Ide S, Fujita T, Oikawa T, Suzuki T, Neyatani Y, Isei N, Hamamatsu K, Ikeda Y, Takahashi K, Kajiwara K and JT-60 Team 2001 Nucl. Fusion 41 761 [15] Yan L, Ji X, Song S, et al. 2017 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 88 113504 [16] Shi T H, Wan B N, Shen B, et al. 2013 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 55 055007 [17] Welander A S, Kolemen E, La Haye R J, Eidietis N W, Humphreys D A, Lohr J, Noraky S, Penaflor B G, Prater R and Turco F 2013 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 55 124033 [18] Bardoczi L, Choi M J, Navarro A B, Shiraki D, La Haye R J, Park S H, Knolker M, Evans T E, McKee G R, Woo M, Park B H and Jenko F 2019 Nucl. Fusion 59 126047 [19] Sauter O, Buttery R J, Felton R, Hender T C, Howell D F and contributors to the EFDA-JET Workprogramme 2002 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 44 1999 [20] La Haye R J, Prater R, Buttery R J, Hayashi N, Isayama A, Maraschek M E, Urso L and Zohm H 2006 Nucl. Fusion 46 451 [21] Westehof E, de Blank H J and J Pratt 2016 Nucl. Fusion 56 036016 [22] Maget P, Fevrier O, Garbet X, Lutjens H, Luciani J F and Marx A 2016 Nucl. Fusion 56 086004 [23] Poli E, Bottino A, Hornsby W A, Peeters A G, Ribeiro T, Scott B D and Siccinio M 2010 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 52 124021 [24] Hornsby W A, Migliano P, Buchholz R, Grosshauser S, Weikl A, Zarzoso D, Casson F J, Poli E and Peeters A G 2016 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 58 014028 [25] Li J C, Xiao C J, Lin Z H, Liu D J, Ji X Q and Wang X G 2020 Phys. Plasmas 27 042507 [26] Li J G and Wan Y X 2019 Journal of Fusion Energy 38 113 [27] Li J C, Ding X T, Dong J Q and Liu S F 2020 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 62 095013 [28] Xia F, Pan L, Zhao L, Pan W, Song X, Li X Y, Wang C, Lan J T, Chen L Y and Nakamura K 2012 Plasma and Fusion Research 7 2405048 [29] Lin-Liu Y R, Chan V S and Prater R 2003 Phys. Plasmas 10 4064 [30] Merkulov A, Westepf E, Schuller F C, de Baar M R, Kramer-Flecken A, Liang Y and TEXTOR Team 2004 Proc. Joint Varenna-Lausanne Int. Workshop on Theory of Fusion Plasmas, Varenna, Italy p. 279 [31] Ramponi G, Farina D, Henderson A M, Poli E, Saibene G and Zohm H 2007 Fusion Sci. Technol. 52 193 [32] Li J C, Gong X Y, Dong J Q, Zheng P W, Song S D, Gao Q D and Du D 2015 Phys. Plasmas 22 062512 [33] Yu Q, Zhang X D and Gunter S 2004 Phys. Plasmas 11 1960 [34] Lao L L, John H St, Stambaugh R D, Kellman A G and Pfeiffer W 1985 Nucl. Fusion 25 1611 [35] Li J C, Gong X Y, Dong J Q, Wang J and Yin L 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 045201 [36] La Haye R J, Isayama A and Maraschek M 2009 Nucl. Fusion 49 045005 [37] Giruzzi G and Zabiego M 2001 Fusion Engineering and Design 53 43 |
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|