PHYSICS OF GASES, PLASMAS, AND ELECTRIC DISCHARGES |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Spatio-temporal measurements of overshoot phenomenon in pulsed inductively coupled discharge |
Xiang-Yun Lv(吕翔云), Fei Gao(高飞)†, Quan-Zhi Zhang(张权治), and You-Nian Wang(王友年) |
1 Key Laboratory of Materials Modification by Laser, Ion, and Electron Beams (Ministry of Education), School of Physics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China |
|
|
Abstract Pulse inductively coupled plasma has been widely used in the microelectronics industry, but the existence of overshoot phenomenon may affect the uniformity of plasma and generate high-energy ions, which could damage the chip. The overshoot phenomenon at various spatial locations in pulsed inductively coupled Ar and Ar/CF4 discharges is studied in this work. The electron density, effective electron temperature, relative light intensity, and electron energy probability function (EEPF) are measured by using a time-resolved Langmuir probe and an optical probe, as a function of axial and radial locations. At the initial stage of pulse, both electron density and relative light intensity exhibit overshoot phenomenon, i.e., they first increase to a peak value and then decrease to a convergent value. The overshoot phenomenon gradually decays, when the probe moves away from the coils. Meanwhile, a delay appears in the variation of the electron densities, and the effective electron temperature decreases, which may be related to the reduced strength of electric field at a distance, and the consequent fewer high-energy electrons, inducing limited ionization and excitation rate. The overshoot phenomenon gradually disappears and the electron density decreases, when the probe moves away from reactor centre. In Ar/CF4 discharge, the overshoot phenomenon of electron density is weaker than that in the Ar discharge, and the plasma reaches a steady density within a much shorter time, which is probably due to the more ionization channels and lower ionization thresholds in the Ar/CF4 plasma.
|
Received: 16 November 2020
Revised: 02 December 2020
Accepted manuscript online: 08 December 2020
|
PACS:
|
52.70.-m
|
(Plasma diagnostic techniques and instrumentation)
|
|
52.70.Kz
|
(Optical (ultraviolet, visible, infrared) measurements)
|
|
52.80.Yr
|
(Discharges for spectral sources)
|
|
52.80.Vp
|
(Discharge in vacuum)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11675039, 11875101, 11935005, and 12075049) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (Grant Nos. DUT18TD06 and DUT20LAB201). |
Corresponding Authors:
†Corresponding author. E-mail: fgao@dlut.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Xiang-Yun Lv(吕翔云), Fei Gao(高飞), Quan-Zhi Zhang(张权治), and You-Nian Wang(王友年) Spatio-temporal measurements of overshoot phenomenon in pulsed inductively coupled discharge 2021 Chin. Phys. B 30 045202
|
1 Lee H C 2018 Appl. Phys. Rev. 5 011108 2 Zaka-ul-lslam M 2016 AIP Conf. Proc. 1742 030012 3 Liu L, Sridhar S, Donnelly V M and Economou D J 2015 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 48 485201 4 Bogdanov E A, Dejoseph C A, Demidov V I, Kudryavtsev A A and Serditov K Yu 2007 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 16 697 5 Subramonium P and Kushner M J 2004 Appl. Phys. Lett. 85 721 6 Midha V and Economou D J 2000 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 9 256 7 Ramamurthi B and Economou D J 2002 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 11 324 8 Qu C, Lanham S J, Shannon S C, Nam S K and Kushner M J 2020 J. Appl. Phys. 127 133302 9 Qu C, Nam S K and Kushner M J 2020 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 29 085006 10 Han J, Pribyl P, Gekelman W and Paterson A 2020 Phys. Plasmas 27 063509 11 Fischetti M and Laux S 1988 Phys. Rev. B 38 9721 12 Darnon M, Cunge G and Braithwaite N S J 2014 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 23 025002 13 Mishra A, Seo J S and Kim K N 2013 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 46 235203 14 Mishra A and YeomG Y 2016 AIP Adv. 6 095101 15 Wang J J, Zhang J, Fu P, Huang Y Y, Guan R, Guo F, Sun H Z and Zhou Y 2019 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 47 1793 16 Sirse N, Karkari S K and Turner M M 2015 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 24 022001 17 Ye R, Ishigaki T and Sakuta T 2005 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 14 387 18 Subramonium P and Kushner M J 2002 Vac. Sci. Technol. A 20 325 19 Kwon D C, Yu D H, Kwon H C, Im Y H and Lee H C 2020 Phys. Plasmas 27 073507 20 Gao F, Lv X Y, Zhang Y R and Wang Y N 2019 J. Appl. Phys. 126 093302 21 Gao F, Zhao S X, Li X S and Wang Y N 2010 Phys. Plasmas 17 103507 22 Liu W, Gao F, Zhao S X, Li X C and Wang Y N 2013 Phys. Plasmas 20 123513 23 Xue C, Gao F, Liu Y X, Liu J and Wang Y N 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 045202 24 Petrovic Z L, Bzenic S, Jovanovic J and Djurovic S 1995 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 28 2287 25 Morishita S, Hayashi Y and Makabe T 2010 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 19 055007 26 Gao F, Zhao S X, Li X S and Wang Y N 2009 Phys. Plasmas 16 113502 27 Ho P, Johannes J E and Buss J 2001 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 19 2344 28 Zhao S X, Gao F, Wang Y N and Bogaerts A 2012 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 21 025008 |
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|