|
|
Interference effect of photoionization of hydrogen atoms by ultra-short and ultra-fast high-frequency chirped pulses |
Ningyue Wang(王宁月)1,2, Aihua Liu(刘爱华)1,2 |
1 Institute of Atomic and Molecular Physics, Jilin University, Changchun 30012, China; 2 Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Atomic and Molecular Spectroscopy, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China |
|
|
Abstract The photoionization of a hydrogen atom from its ground state with ultra-fast chirped pulses is investigated by numerically solving the time-dependent Schrödinger equation within length, velocity, and Kramers-Henneberger gauges. Converged results for all gauges for chirp-free pulses agree with the prediction of dynamic interference for ground state hydrogen atoms predicted recently by Jiang and Burgdörfer[Opt. Express 26, 19921 (2018)]. In addition, we investigated photoelectron spectra of hydrogen atoms by chirped laser pulses, and showed that dynamic interference effect will be weaken for pulses with increasing linear chirp. Our numerical results can be understood and discussed in terms of an interplay of photoelectron wavepackets from first and second halves of laser enevelop, including the ac Stark energy level shift of the photoelectron final state and atomic stabilization effect at ultra-high intensities.
|
Received: 17 May 2019
Revised: 13 June 2019
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
34.80.Qb
|
(Laser-modified scattering)
|
|
34.80.Dp
|
(Atomic excitation and ionization)
|
|
32.80.Wr
|
(Other multiphoton processes)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11774131 and 91850114). |
Corresponding Authors:
Aihua Liu
E-mail: aihualiu@jlu.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Ningyue Wang(王宁月), Aihua Liu(刘爱华) Interference effect of photoionization of hydrogen atoms by ultra-short and ultra-fast high-frequency chirped pulses 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 083403
|
[1] |
Strickland D and Mourou G 1985 Opt. Commun. 56 219
|
[2] |
Krausz F and Ivanov M 2009 Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 163
|
[3] |
Sansone G, Benedetti E, Calegari F, Vozzi C, Avaldi L, Flammini R, Poletto L, Villoresi P, Altucci C, Velotta R, Stagira S, Silvestri S D and Nisoli M 2006 Science 314 443
|
[4] |
Zhao K, Zhang Q, Chini M, Wu Y, Wang X W and Chang Z H 2012 Opt. Lett. 37 3891
|
[5] |
Li J, Ren X, Yin Y, Zhao K, Chew A, Cheng Y, Cunningham E, Wang Y, Hu S, Wu Y, Chini M and Chang Z 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 186
|
[6] |
Gaumnitz T, Jain A, Pertot Y, Huppert M, Jordan I, F Ardana-Lamas, and Wörner H J 2017 Opt. Express 25 27506
|
[7] |
The extreme light infrastructure (ELI) project,https://eli-laser.eu. Webpages were pulled at Sept. 10, 2018
|
[8] |
Eberly J H and Kulander K C 1993 Science 262 1229
|
[9] |
Delone N B and Krainov V P 1999 Phys.-Usp. 42 669
|
[10] |
He F, Ruiz C, Becker A and Thumm U 2011 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 44 211001
|
[11] |
Toyota K, Tolstikhin O I, Morishita T and Watanabe S 2007 Phys. Rev. A 76 043418
|
[12] |
Guo J, Guo F M, Chen J and Yang Y J 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 073202 (in Chinese)
|
[13] |
Jiang W C and Burgdörfer J 2018 Opt. Express 26 19921
|
[14] |
Demekhin P V, Hochstuhl D and Cederbaum L S 2013 Phys. Rev. A 88 023422
|
[15] |
Demekhin P V and Cederbaum L S 2012 Phys. Rev. A 86 063412
|
[16] |
Demekhin P V and Cederbaum L S 2013 Phys. Rev. A 88 043414
|
[17] |
Baghery M, Saalmann U and Rost J M 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 143202
|
[18] |
Wang M X, Liang H, Xiao X R, Chen S G, Jiang W C and Peng L Y 2018 Phys. Rev. A 98 023412
|
[19] |
Müller ller A D, Kutscher E, Artemyev A N, Cederbaum L S and Demekhin P V 2018 Chem. Phys. 509 145
|
[20] |
Demekhin P V and Cederbaum L S 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 253001
|
[21] |
Sun F, Wei D, Zhang G Z, Ding X and Yao J Q 2016 Chin. Phys. Lett. 33 123202
|
[22] |
Pont M and Gavrila M 1990 Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 2362
|
[23] |
Yudin G L, Patchkovskii S and Bandrauk A D 2008 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 41 045602
|
[24] |
Krasovskii E E and Bonitz M 2009 Phys. Rev. A 80 053421
|
[25] |
Tan F, Peng L Y and Gong Q 2009 Chin. Phys. B 18 4807
|
[26] |
Wu J, Zhang G T, Xia C L and Liu X S 2010 Phys. Rev. A 82 013411
|
[27] |
Nakajima T 2007 Phys. Rev. A 75 053409
|
[28] |
Peng L Y, Tan F, Gong Q H, Pronin E A and Starace A F 2009 Phys. Rev. A 80 013407
|
[29] |
Liao Q and Thumm U 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 023602
|
[30] |
Barmaki S, Lanteigne P and Laulan S 2014 Phys. Rev. A 89 063406
|
[31] |
Tong Y, Jiang W C, Wu P and Peng L Y 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 073202
|
[32] |
Schafer K J, Gaarde M B, Kulander K C, Sheehy B and DiMauro L F 2000 AIP Conf. Proc. 525 45
|
[33] |
Gavrila M 2002 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 35 R147
|
[34] |
Feuerstein B and Thumm U 2003 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 36 707
|
[35] |
Wei S S, Li S Y, Guo F M, Yang Y J and Wang B B 2013 Phys. Rev. A 87 063418
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|