INTERDISCIPLINARY PHYSICS AND RELATED AREAS OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Enhancing convolutional neural network scheme forrheumatoid arthritis grading with limited clinical data |
Jian Tang(汤键)1, Zhibin Jin(金志斌)2, Xue Zhou(周雪)1, Weijing Zhang(张玮婧)2, Min Wu(吴敏)2, Qinghong Shen(沈庆宏)1, Qian Cheng(程茜)3, Xueding Wang(王学鼎)3, Jie Yuan(袁杰)1,2,3 |
1 School of Electronic Science and Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China;
2 Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing 210023, China;
3 Institution of Acoustics, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China |
|
|
Abstract The gray-scale ultrasound (US) imaging method is usually used to assess synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in clinical practice. This four-grade scoring system depends highly on the sonographer's experience and has relatively lower validity compared with quantitative indexes. However, the training of a qualified sonographer is expensive and time-consuming while few studies focused on automatic RA grading methods. The purpose of this study is to propose an automatic RA grading method using deep convolutional neural networks (DCNN) to assist clinical assessment. Gray-scale ultrasound images of finger joints are taken as inputs while the output is the corresponding RA grading results. Firstly, we performed the auto-localization of synovium in the RA image and obtained a high precision in localization. In order to make up for the lack of a large annotated training dataset, we performed data augmentation to increase the number of training samples. Motivated by the approach of transfer learning, we pre-trained the GoogLeNet on ImageNet as a feature extractor and then fine-tuned it on our own dataset. The detection results showed an average precision exceeding 90%. In the experiment of grading RA severity, the four-grade classification accuracy exceeded 90% while the binary classification accuracies exceeded 95%. The results demonstrate that our proposed method achieves performances comparable to RA experts in multi-class classification. The promising results of our proposed DCNN-based RA grading method can have the ability to provide an objective and accurate reference to assist RA diagnosis and the training of sonographers.
|
Received: 18 October 2018
Revised: 19 December 2018
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
87.57.-s
|
(Medical imaging)
|
|
07.05.Mh
|
(Neural networks, fuzzy logic, artificial intelligence)
|
|
43.35.Wa
|
(Biological effects of ultrasound, ultrasonic tomography)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2017YFC0111402) and the Natural Science Funds of Jiangsu Province of China (Grant No. BK20181256). |
Corresponding Authors:
Jie Yuan
E-mail: yuanjie@nju.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Jian Tang(汤键), Zhibin Jin(金志斌), Xue Zhou(周雪), Weijing Zhang(张玮婧), Min Wu(吴敏), Qinghong Shen(沈庆宏), Qian Cheng(程茜), Xueding Wang(王学鼎), Jie Yuan(袁杰) Enhancing convolutional neural network scheme forrheumatoid arthritis grading with limited clinical data 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 038701
|
[1] |
Tang M W, Garcia S, Gerlag D M, Tak P P and Reedquist K A 2017 Front. Immunol. 8 720
|
[2] |
Wakefield R J, Balint P V, Szkudlarek M et al. 2005 J. Rheumatol. 32 2485
|
[3] |
Szkudlarek M, Court-Payen M, Jacobsen S, Klarlund M, Thomsen H S and Ostergaard M 2003 Arthritis Rheum. 48 955
|
[4] |
Colebatch A N, Edwards C J, Ostergaard M et al. 2013 Ann. Rheum. Dis. 72 804
|
[5] |
Lee S, Choi M, Choi H S, Park M S and Yoon S 2015 IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference, October 22-24 2015 Atlanta, USA, p. 1
|
[6] |
Murakami S, Hatano K, Tan J, Kim H and Aoki T 2018 Multimed. Tools Appl. 77 10921
|
[7] |
Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I and Hinton G E 2012 Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 25, December 3-6, 2012, Lake Tahoe, USA, p. 1097
|
[8] |
Sermanet P, Eigen D, Zhang X, Mathieu M, Fergus R and Lecun Y 2013 arXiv:1312.6229
|
[9] |
Pavlidis T and Liow Y T 1988 IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 12 208
|
[10] |
Dalal N and Triggs B 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, June 20-25, 2005, San Diego, USA, p. 886
|
[11] |
Lowe D G 2004 Int. J. Comput. Vis. 60 91
|
[12] |
Schmidhuber J 2015 Neural Netw. 61 85
|
[13] |
LeCun Y, Bengio Y and Hinton G 2015 Nature 521 436
|
[14] |
Litjens G, Kooi T, Bejnordi B E, Setio A A A, Ciompi F, Ghafoorian M, Laak J A W M V D, Ginneken B V and Sánchez C I 2017 Med. Image Anal. 42 60
|
[15] |
Pan S J and Yang Q 2010 IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 22 1345
|
[16] |
Deng J, DongW, Socher R, Li L J, Li K and Fei-Fei L 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, June 20-25, 2009, Miami, USA, p. 248
|
[17] |
Zhang G P 2000 IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Pt. C Appl. Rev. 30 451
|
[18] |
Hussein S, Gillies R, Cao K, Song Q and Bagci U 2017 IEEE 14th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, April 18-21, 2017, Melbourne, Australia, p. 1007
|
[19] |
Jung H, Lee S, Yim J, Park S and Yim J 2015 15th IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, December 11-18, 2015, Santiago, Chile, p. 2983
|
[20] |
Bayramoglu N, Kannala J and Heikkilä J 2015 IEEE 15th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering, November 2-4, 2015, Belgrade, Serbia, p. 1
|
[21] |
Rodrigues L F, Naldi M C and Mari J F 2017 30th Conference on Graphics, Patterns and Images, October 17-20, 2017, Niteroi, Brazil, p. 170
|
[22] |
Ren S, He K, Girshick R and Sun J 2017 IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 39 1137
|
[23] |
Girshick R 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, December 7-13, 2015, Santiago, Chile, p. 1440
|
[24] |
Zeiler M D and Fergus R 2014 European Conference on Computer Vision, September 6-12, 2014, Zurich, Switzerland, p. 818
|
[25] |
Szegedy C, Liu W, Jia Y, Sermanet P, Reed S, Anguelov D, Erhan D, Vanhoucke V and Rabinovich A 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, June 7-12, 2015, Boston, USA, p. 1
|
[26] |
Bengio Y, Simard P and Frasconi P 1994 IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 5 157
|
[27] |
Glorot X and Bengio Y 2010 Proceedings of the thirteenth international conference on artificial intelligence and statistics, May 13-15, 2010, Sardinia, Italy, p. 249
|
[28] |
Jia Y, Shelhamer E, Donahue J, Karayev S, Long J, Girshick R, Guadarrama S and Darrell T 2014 ACM Conference on Multimedia, November 03-07, 2014, Orlando, USA, p. 675
|
[29] |
LeCun Y, Boser B, Denker J S, Henderson D, Howard R E, Hubbard W and Jackel L D 1989 Neural Comput. 1 541
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|