|
|
Influence of random phase modulation on the imaging quality of computational ghost imaging |
Chao Gao(高超), Xiao-Qian Wang(王晓茜), Hong-Ji Cai(蔡宏吉), Jie Ren(任捷), Ji-Yuan Liu(刘籍元), Zhi-Hai Yao(姚治海) |
Department of Physics, Changchun University of Science and Technology, Changchun 130022, China |
|
|
Abstract In this paper, we investigated phase modulation-based computational ghost imaging. According to the results of numerical simulations, we found that the range of the random phase affects the quality of the reconstructed image. Besides, compared with those amplitude modulation-based computational ghost imaging schemes, introducing random phase modulation into the computational ghost imaging scheme could significantly improve the spatial resolution of the reconstructed image, and also extend the field of view.
|
Received: 21 October 2018
Revised: 26 November 2018
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
02.10.Ox
|
(Combinatorics; graph theory)
|
|
42.30.Wb
|
(Image reconstruction; tomography)
|
|
42.50.Xa
|
(Optical tests of quantum theory)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11305020), the Science and Technology Research Projects of the Education Department of Jilin Province, China (Grant No. 2016-354), and the Science and Technology Development Project of Jilin Province, China (Grant No. 20180520165JH). |
Corresponding Authors:
Xiao-Qian Wang, Zhi-Hai Yao
E-mail: xqwang21@163.com;yaozh@cust.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Chao Gao(高超), Xiao-Qian Wang(王晓茜), Hong-Ji Cai(蔡宏吉), Jie Ren(任捷), Ji-Yuan Liu(刘籍元), Zhi-Hai Yao(姚治海) Influence of random phase modulation on the imaging quality of computational ghost imaging 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 020201
|
[1] |
Pittman T, Shih Y, Strekalov D and Sergienko A 1995 Phys. Rev. A 52 R3429.
|
[2] |
Bennink R S, Bentley S J and Boyd R W 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 113601
|
[3] |
Gong W and Han S 2012 Phys. Lett. A 376 1519
|
[4] |
Meyers R E, Deacon K S and Shih Y 2011 Appl. Phys. Lett. 98 111115
|
[5] |
Zhang Y T, He C J, Li H G and Wang K G 2008 Chin. Phys. Lett. 25 2481
|
[6] |
Duan D Y, Zhang L, Du S J and Xia Y J 2015 Chin. Phys. B 24 024202
|
[7] |
Chen X H, Yan L, Wu W, Meng S Y, Wu L A, Sun Z B, Wang C and Zhai G J 2017 Chin. Phys. B 26 060702
|
[8] |
Xu Z H, Chen W, Penuelas J, Padgett M and Sun M J 2018 Opt. Express 26 2427
|
[9] |
Hardy N D and Shapiro J H 2013 Phys. Rev. A 87 023820
|
[10] |
Liu Q, Luo K H, Chen X H and Wu L A 2010 Chin. Phys. B 19 094211
|
[11] |
Erkmen B I 2012 J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 29 782
|
[12] |
Ceddia D and Paganin D M 2018 Phys. Rev. A 97
|
[13] |
Yu W K, Yao X R, Liu X F, Li L Z and Zhai G J 2015 Chin. Phys. B 24 054203
|
[14] |
Gao C, Wang X Q, Wang Z F, Li Z, Du G J, Chang F and Yao Z H 2017 Phys. Rev. A 96 023838
|
[15] |
Martienssen W and Spiller E 1964 Am. J. Phys. 32 919
|
[16] |
Gatti A, Brambilla E, Bache M and Lugiato L 2004 Phys. Rev. A 70 70 013802
|
[17] |
Shapiro J H 2008 Phys. Rev. A 78 061802
|
[18] |
Scully M O and Zubairy M S 1999 Quantum optics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
|
[19] |
Liu X, Yao X, Li M, Yu W, Chen X H, Sun Z, Wu L and Zhai G 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 184205 (in Chinese)
|
[20] |
Chan K W C, O'Sullivan M N and Boyd R W 2010 Opt. Express 18 5562
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|