PHYSICS OF GASES, PLASMAS, AND ELECTRIC DISCHARGES |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Numerical simulation of the initial plasma formation and current transfer in single-wire electrical explosion in vacuum |
Kun Wang(王坤)1, Zong-Qian Shi(史宗谦)2, Yuan-Jie Shi(石元杰)2, Jun Bai(白骏)2, Jian Wu(吴坚)2, Shen-Li Jia(贾申利)2, Ai-Ci Qiu(邱爱慈)2 |
1 Province & #8211;Ministry Joint Key Laboratory of Electromagnetic Field and Electrical Apparatus Reliability, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300130, China; 2 State Key Laboratory of Electrical Insulation and Power Equipment, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China |
|
|
Abstract In this paper, a computational model is constructed to investigate the phenomenon of the initial plasma formation and current transfer in the single-wire electrical explosion in a vacuum. The process of the single-wire electrical explosion is divided into four stages. Stage I:the wire is in solid state. Stage Ⅱ:the melting stage. Stage Ⅲ:the wire melts completely and the initial plasma forms. Stage IV:the core and corona expand separately. The thermodynamic calculation is applied before the wire melts completely in stages I and Ⅱ. In stage Ⅲ, a one-dimensional magnetohydrodynamics model comes into play until the instant when the voltage collapse occurs. The temperature, density, and velocity, which are derived from the magnetohydrodynamics calculation, are averaged over the distribution area. The averaged parameters are taken as the initial conditions for stage IV in which a simplified magnetohydrodynamics model is applied. A wide-range semi-empirical equation of state, which is established based on the Thomas–Fermi–Kirzhnits model, is constructed to describe the phase transition from solid state to plasma state. The initial plasma formation and the phenomenon of current transfer in the electrical explosion of aluminum wire are investigated using the computational model. Experiments of electrical explosion of aluminum wires are carried out to verify this model. Simulation results are also compared with experimental results of the electrical explosion of copper wire.
|
Received: 29 November 2016
Revised: 29 March 2017
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
52.80.Qj
|
(Explosions; exploding wires)
|
|
52.65.Kj
|
(Magnetohydrodynamic and fluid equation)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos.51322706,51237006,and 51325705),the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University,China (Grant No.NCET-11-0428),and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities,China. |
Corresponding Authors:
Zong-Qian Shi
E-mail: zqshi@mail.xjtu.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Kun Wang(王坤), Zong-Qian Shi(史宗谦), Yuan-Jie Shi(石元杰), Jun Bai(白骏), Jian Wu(吴坚), Shen-Li Jia(贾申利), Ai-Ci Qiu(邱爱慈) Numerical simulation of the initial plasma formation and current transfer in single-wire electrical explosion in vacuum 2017 Chin. Phys. B 26 075204
|
[1] |
Krasik Y E, Grinenko A, Sayapin A, Efimov S, Fedotov A, Gurovich V Z and Oreshkin V I 2008 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 36 423
|
[2] |
Wang K, Shi Z Q, Shi Y J, Bai J, Li Y, Wu Z Q, Qiu A C and Jia S L 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 015203 (in Chinese)
|
[3] |
Zou X B, Mao Z G, Wang X X and Jiang W H 2013 Chin. Phys. B 22 045206
|
[4] |
Wu J, Li X W, Li Y, Yang Z F, Shi Z Q, Jia S L and Qiu A C 2014 Acta Phys. Sin. 63 125206 (in Chinese)
|
[5] |
Duselis P U and Kusse B R 2003 Phys. Plasmas 10 565
|
[6] |
Shi Y J, Shi Z Q, Wang K, Wu Z Q and Jia S L 2017 Phys. Plasmas 24 012706
|
[7] |
Zhao J P, Zhang Q G, Yan W Y, Liu X D, Liu L C, Zhou Q and Qiu A C 2013 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 41 2207
|
[8] |
Wang K 2017 Phys. Plasmas 24 022702
|
[9] |
Sarkisov G S, Rosenthal S E, Cochrane K, Struve K, Deeney C and McDaniel D 2005 Phys. Rev. E 71 046404
|
[10] |
Tkachenko S I, Mingaleev A R, Pikuz S A, Romanova V M, Khattatov T A, Shelkovenko T A, Ol'Khovskaya O G, Gasilov V A and Kalinin Y G 2012 Plasma Phys. Rep. 38 1
|
[11] |
Beilis I I, Baksht R B, Oreshkin V I, Russkikh A G, Chaikovskii S A, Labetskii A Y, Ratakhin N A and Shishlov A V 2008 Phys. Plasmas 15 013501
|
[12] |
Sarkisov G S, Rosenthal S E and Struve K W 2007 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 78 043505
|
[13] |
Stephens J and Neuber A 2012 Phys. Rev. E 86 066409
|
[14] |
Zhang H X 1988 Acta Aerodyn. Sin. 6 143 (in Chinese)
|
[15] |
Oreshkin V I 2008 Phys. Plasmas 15 092103
|
[16] |
Shemyakin O P, Levashov P R and Khishchenko K V 2012 Contrib. Plasma Phys. 52 40
|
[17] |
Kirzhnits D A 1957 Soviet Phys. JETP 5 65
|
[18] |
Wang K, Shi Z Q, Shi Y J, Wu J, Jia S L and Qiu A C 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 156401 (in Chinese)
|
[19] |
Desjarlais M P 2001 Contrib. Plasma Phys. 41 267
|
[20] |
Wang K, Shi Z Q, Shi Y J, Bai J, Wu J and Jia S L 2015 Phys. Plasmas 22 062709
|
[21] |
Shi Z Q, Wang K, Li Y, Shi Y J, Wu J and Jia S L 2014 Phys. Plasmas 21 032702
|
[22] |
Apfelbaum E M 2011 Phys. Rev. E 84 066403
|
[23] |
Kuhlbrodt S, Holst B and Redmer R 2015 Contrib. Plasma Phys. 45 73
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|