|
|
The squeezing dynamics of two independent atoms by detuning in two non-Markovian environments |
Zou Hong-Mei (邹红梅), Fang Mao-Fa (方卯发), Yang Bai-Yuan (杨百元) |
Key Laboratory of Low-Dimensional Quantum Structures and Quantum Control, Ministry of Education, and Department of Physics, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China |
|
|
Abstract The squeezing dynamics of two independent two-level atoms off-resonantly coupled to two non-Markovian reservoirs is studied by the time-convolutionless master-equation approach. We find that the squeezing of two atoms is dependent on both detuning and the non-Markovian effect. Our results show that, in the non-Markovian regime, the bigger the detuning and the stronger the non-Markovian effect are, the larger the strength of the squeezing is. And the squeezing of two atoms can be effectively protected for a long time when both the non-Markovian effect and detuning are present simultaneously. The physical mechanism is that the detuning not only can promote the feedback of information from the environment into the atomic system but also can greatly suppress the atomic decay in the non-Markovian regime.
|
Received: 11 April 2013
Revised: 10 May 2013
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
03.67.-a
|
(Quantum information)
|
|
03.65.Yz
|
(Decoherence; open systems; quantum statistical methods)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China (Grant No. 09JJ5001), the Science and Technology Plan of Hunan Province, China (Grant No. 2010FJ3148), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 10374025). |
Corresponding Authors:
Fang Mao-Fa
E-mail: mffang@hunnu.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Zou Hong-Mei (邹红梅), Fang Mao-Fa (方卯发), Yang Bai-Yuan (杨百元) The squeezing dynamics of two independent atoms by detuning in two non-Markovian environments 2013 Chin. Phys. B 22 120303
|
[1] |
Heisenberg W 1927 Z. Phys. 43 172
|
[2] |
Robertson H P 1929 Phys. Rev. 34 163
|
[3] |
Horodecki R, Horodecki P, Horodecki M and Horodecki K 2009 Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 865
|
[4] |
Gühne O and Toth G 2009 Phys. Rep. 474 1
|
[5] |
Duan L M, Giedke G, Cirac J I and Zoller P 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 2722
|
[6] |
Simon R 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 2726
|
[7] |
Gühne O 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 117903
|
[8] |
Huang Y 2010 Phys. Rev. A 82 012335
|
[9] |
Huang Y 2010 Phys. Rev. A 82 069903
|
[10] |
Gisin N, Ribordy G, Tittel W and Zbinden H 2002 Rev. Mod. Phys. 74 145
|
[11] |
Massar S and Spindel P 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 190401
|
[12] |
Wódkiewicz K and Eberly J H 1987 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2 458
|
[13] |
Wódkiewicz K 1985 Phys. Rev. B 32 4750
|
[14] |
Goda K, Miyakawa O, Mikhailov E E, Saraf S, Adhikari R, Mckenzie K, Ward R, Vass S, Weinstein A J and Mavalvala N 2008 Nat. Phys. 4 472
|
[15] |
Wineland D J, BolIonger J J and Itano W M 1994 Phys. Rev. A 50 67
|
[16] |
Sorensen J L, Hald J and Polzik E S 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 3487
|
[17] |
Ye J, Kimble H J and Katori H 2008 Science 320 1734
|
[18] |
Furusawa A, Sφrensen J L, Braunstein S L, Fuchs C A, Kimble H J and Polzik E S 1998 Science 282 706
|
[19] |
Huo W Y and Long G L 2008 Appl. Phys. Lett. 92 133102
|
[20] |
Xue F, Liu Y, Sun C P and Nori F 2007 Phys. Rev. B 76 064305
|
[21] |
Etaki S, Poot M, Mahboob I, Onomitsu K, Yamaguchi H and Van der zant H S J 2008 Nat. Phys. 4 785
|
[22] |
Jing J T, Liu C J, Zhou Z F, et al. 2012 Chin. Sci. Bull. 57 (16) 1925
|
[23] |
Breuer H P and Petruccione F 2002 The Theory of Open Quantum Systems (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
|
[24] |
Lambropoulos P, Nikolopoulos G M, Nielsen T R and Bay S 2000 Rep. Prog. Phys. 63 455
|
[25] |
Piilo J, Maniscalco S, Härkönen K and Suominen K A 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 180402
|
[26] |
Dublin F, Rotter D, Mukherjee M, Russo C, Eschner J and Blatt R 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 183003
|
[27] |
Lai C W, Maletinsky P, Badolato A and Imamoglu A 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 167403
|
[28] |
Galland C, Hogele A, Tureci H E and Imamoglu A 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 067402
|
[29] |
Breuer H P, Burgarth D and Petruccione F 2004 Phys. Rev. B 70 045323
|
[30] |
Xiao X, Fang M F, Li Y L, Kang G D and Wu C 2010 Eur. Phys. J. D 57 447
|
[31] |
Xiao X, Fang M F and Hu Y M 2011 Phys. Scr. 84 045011
|
[32] |
Yin X L, Ma J, Wang X G and Nori F 2012 e-print arXiv: 1204.0093
|
[33] |
Ferraro E, Scala M, Migliore R and Napoli A 2009 Phys. Rev. A 80 042112
|
[34] |
Sinayskiy I, Ferraro E, Napoli A, Messina A and Petruccione F 2009 e-print arXiv: 0906.1796
|
[35] |
Breuer H P, Laine E M and Piilo J 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 210401
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|