|
|
Quantum nondemolition measurements of a flux qubit coupled to a noisy detector |
Jiang Wei(姜伟)a), Yu Yang(于扬) a)b)†, and Wei Lian-Fu(韦联福)b)‡ |
a National Laboratory of Solid State Microstructures and Department of Physics, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China; b Laboratory of Quantum Opt-electronics, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China |
|
|
Abstract We theoretically study the quantum nondemolition measurements of a flux qubit coupled to a noisy superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID). The obtained analytical results indicate that the measurement probability is frequency-dependent in a short time scale and has a close relationship with the measurement-induced dephasing. Furthermore, when the detuning between the driven and bare resonator equals the coupling strength, we can obtain the maximum measurement rate that is determined by the character of the noise in the SQUID. Finally, we analysed the mixed effect caused by coupling between the non-diagonal term and the external variable. It is found that the initial information of the qubit is destroyed due to quantum tunneling between the qubit states.
|
Received: 27 February 2011
Revised: 31 March 2011
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
03.67.Lx
|
(Quantum computation architectures and implementations)
|
|
03.65.Yz
|
(Decoherence; open systems; quantum statistical methods)
|
|
85.25.Cp
|
(Josephson devices)
|
|
85.25.Dq
|
(Superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs))
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 10725415) and the State Key Program for
Basic Research of China (Grant No. 2006CB921801). |
Cite this article:
Jiang Wei(姜伟), Yu Yang(于扬), and Wei Lian-Fu(韦联福) Quantum nondemolition measurements of a flux qubit coupled to a noisy detector 2011 Chin. Phys. B 20 080307
|
[1] |
Walls D F and Milburn G J 1994 Quantum Optics (Berlin: Springer-Verlag)
|
[2] |
Caves C M, Thorne K S, Drever R W P, Sandberg V D and Zimmermann M 1980 Rev. Mod. Phys. 52 341
|
[3] |
Milburn G J and Walls D F 1980 Phys. Rev. A 28 2065
|
[4] |
Imoto N, Haus H A and Yamamoto Y 1985 Phys. Rev. A 32 2287
|
[5] |
Bachor H A, Levenson M D, Walls D F, Perlmutter S H and Shelby R M 1988 Phys. Rev. A 38 180
|
[6] |
Larson J and Abdel-Aty M 2009 Phys. Rev. A 80 053609
|
[7] |
Brune M, Haroche S and Raimond J M 1988 Phys. Rev. A 45 5139
|
[8] |
Boissonneault M, Gambetta J M and Blais A 2009 Phys. Rev. A 79 013819
|
[9] |
Shi Z G, Chen X W, Zhu X X and Song K H 2009 Chin. Phys. B 18 910
|
[10] |
Lupascu A, Saito S, Picot T, De Groot P C, Harmans C J P M and Mooij J E 2007 Nat. Phys. 3 119
|
[11] |
Bocko M F and Onofrio R 1996 Rev. Mod. Phys. 68 755
|
[12] |
Makhlin Y, Schon G and Shnirman A 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 4578
|
[13] |
Ji Y H, Lai H F, Cai S H and Wang Z S 2010 Chin. Phys. B 19 030310
|
[14] |
Clerk A A, Girvin S M and Stone A D 2003 Phys. Rev. B 67 165324
|
[15] |
Averin D V arXiv: cond-mat/0004364v1
|
[16] |
Viola L, Onofrio R and Calarco T 1997 Phys. Rev. A 229 23
|
[17] |
Chirolli L and Burkard G 2009 Phys. Rev. B 80 184509
|
[18] |
Clerk A A, Devoret M H, Girvin S M, Marquardt F and Schoelkopf R J 2010 Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 1155
|
[19] |
Ashhab S, You J Q and Nori F 2009 New J. Phys. 11 083017
|
[20] |
Gambetta J, Blais A, Schuster D I, Wallraff A, Frunzio L, Majer J, Devoret M H, Girvin S M and Schoelkopf R J 2006 Phys. Rev. A 74 042318
|
[21] |
Gambetta J, Blais A, Boissonneault M, Houck A A, Schuster D I and Girvin S M 2008 Phys. Rev. A 77 012112
|
[22] |
Blais A, Huang R S, Wallraff A, Girvin S M and Schoelkopf R J 2004 Phys. Rev. A 69 062320
|
[23] |
Marquardt F, Chen J P, Clerk A A and Girvin S M 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 093902
|
[24] |
Wang Y D, Li Y, Xue F, Bruder C and Semba K 2009 Phys. Rev. B 80 144508
|
[25] |
Rocheleau T, Ndukum T, Macklin C, Hertzberg J B, Clerk A A and Schwab K C 2010 Nature 463 72
|
[26] |
Gigan S, Bohm H R, Paternostro M, Blaser F, Langer G, Hertzberg J B, Schwab K C, Bauerle D, Aspelmeyer M and Zeilinger A 2006 Nature 444 67
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|