The evaluation of bond dissociation energies for NO2 scission in nitro compounds using density functional and complete basis set methods
Shao Ju-Xiang (邵菊香)ab, Cheng Xin-Lu (程新路)a, Yang Xiang-Dong (杨向东)a, He Bi (何碧)c
a Institute of Atomic and Molecular Physics, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China; b Center of Laboratory, Yibin University, Yibin 644007, China; c Institute of Chemical Materials, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang 621900, China
Abstract By using the density functional theory (B3LYP) and four highly accurate complete basis set (CBS-Q, CBS-QB3, CBS-Lq, and CBS-4M) ab initio methods, the $X$(C, N, O)--NO$_{2}$ bond dissociation energies (BDEs) for CH$_{3}$NO$_{2}$, C$_{2}$H$_{3}$NO$_{2}$, C$_{2}$H$_{5}$NO$_{2}$, HONO$_{2}$, CH$_{3}$ONO$_{2}$, C$_{2}$H$_{5}$ONO$_{2}$, NH$_{2}$NO$_{2}$ (CH$_{3})_{2}$NNO$_{2}$ are computed. By comparing the computed BDEs and experimental results, it is found that the B3LYP method is unable to predict satisfactorily the results of bond dissociation energy (BDE); however, all four CBS models are generally able to give reliable predication of the $X$(C, N, O)--NO$_{2}$ BDEs for these nitro compounds. Moreover, the CBS-4M calculation is the least computationally demanding among the four CBS methods considered. Therefore, we recommend CBS-4M method as a reliable method of computing the BDEs for this nitro compound system.
Received: 04 June 2005
Revised: 14 July 2005
Accepted manuscript online:
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China and China Academy of Engineering Physics (Grant Nos 10376021, 10274055).
Cite this article:
Shao Ju-Xiang (邵菊香), Cheng Xin-Lu (程新路), Yang Xiang-Dong (杨向东), He Bi (何碧) The evaluation of bond dissociation energies for NO2 scission in nitro compounds using density functional and complete basis set methods 2006 Chinese Physics 15 329
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.