Please wait a minute...
Chin. Phys. B, 2020, Vol. 29(3): 034305    DOI: 10.1088/1674-1056/ab6c4f
ELECTROMAGNETISM, OPTICS, ACOUSTICS, HEAT TRANSFER, CLASSICAL MECHANICS, AND FLUID DYNAMICS Prev   Next  

Influence of dynamic tissue properties on temperature elevation and lesions during HIFU scanning therapy: Numerical simulation

Xiao Zou(邹孝), Hu Dong(董胡), Sheng-You Qian(钱盛友)
School of Physics and Electronics, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China
Abstract  When large tumors are treated, ablation of the entire volume of tumors requires multiple treatment spots formed by high intensity-focused ultrasound (HIFU) scanning therapy. The heating effect of HIFU on biological tissue is mainly reflected in temperature elevation and tissue lesions. Tissue property parameters vary with temperature and, in turn, the distribution of temperature as well as the heating effects change accordingly. In this study, an HIFU scanning therapy model considering dynamic tissue properties is provided. The acoustic fields and temperature fields are solved combining the Helmholtz wave equation with Pennes bio-heat transfer equation based on the finite element method (FEM) to investigate the effects of various tissue properties (i.e., the attenuation coefficient, acoustic velocity, thermal conductivity, specific heat capacity, density, and blood perfusion rate) on heating performance. Comparisons of the temperature distribution and thermal lesions under static and dynamic properties are made based on the data of tissue property parameters varying with temperature. The results show that the dynamic changes of thermal conductivity, specific heat capacity, and acoustic velocity may account for the decrease of temperature elevation in HIFU treatment, while the dynamic changes of attenuation coefficient, density, and blood perfusion rate aggravate the increase of temperature on treatment spots. Compared with other properties, the dynamic change of attenuation coefficient has a greater impact on tissue temperature elevation. During HIFU scanning therapy, the temperature elevation and tissue lesions of the first treatment spot are smaller than those of the subsequent treatment spots, but the temperature on the last treatment spot drops faster during the cooling period. The ellipsoidal tissue lesion is not symmetrical; specifically, the part facing toward the previous treatment spot tends to be larger. Under the condition of the same doses, the temperature elevation and the size of tissue lesions under dynamic properties present significant growth in comparison to static properties. Besides, the tissue lesion begins to form earlier with a more unsymmetrical shape and is connected to the tissue lesion around the previous treatment spot. As a result, lesions around all the treatment spots are connected with each other to form a closed lesion region. The findings in this study reveal the influence of dynamic tissue properties on temperature elevation and lesions during HIFU scanning therapy, providing useful support for the optimization of treatment programs to guarantee higher efficacy and safety.
Keywords:  high intensity-focused ultrasound (HIFU)      temperature elevation      tissue lesions      dynamic tissue properties  
Received:  20 December 2019      Revised:  12 January 2020      Published:  05 March 2020
PACS:  43.35.+d (Ultrasonics, quantum acoustics, and physical effects of sound)  
  43.80.+p (Bioacoustics)  
Fund: Project partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11774088 and 11474090), the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China (Grant Nos. 2016JJ3090 and 2018JJ3557), and the Scientific Research Fund of Hunan Provincial Education Department, China (Grant Nos. 16B155 and 17B025).
Corresponding Authors:  Sheng-You Qian     E-mail:  shyqian@hunnu.edu.cn

Cite this article: 

Xiao Zou(邹孝), Hu Dong(董胡), Sheng-You Qian(钱盛友) Influence of dynamic tissue properties on temperature elevation and lesions during HIFU scanning therapy: Numerical simulation 2020 Chin. Phys. B 29 034305

[1] Chang S H, Cao R, Zhang Y B, Wang P G, Wu S J, Qian Y H and Jian X Q 2013 Ultrasound Med. Biol. 39 1771
[2] Wang H L, Fan P F, Guo X S, Tu J, Ma Y and Zhang D 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 124314
[3] Wang X D, Lin W J, Su C and Wang X M 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 024302
[4] Kennedy J E, ter Haar G R and Cranston D 2003 Br. J. Radiol. 76 590
[5] Clement G T 2004 Ultrasonics 42 1087
[6] Illing R O, Kennedy J E, Wu F, ter Haar G R, Protheroe A S, Friend P J, Gleeson F V, Cranston D W, Phillips R R and Middleton M R 2005 Br. J. Cancer 93 890
[7] Hsiao Y H, Kuo S J, Tsai H D, Chou M C and Yeh G P 2016 J. Cancer 7 225
[8] Kovatcheva R, Vlahov J, Stoinov J, Lacoste F, Ortune C and Zaletel K 2014 Eur. Radiol. 24 2052
[9] Fruehauf J H, Back W, Eiermann A, Lang M C, Pessel M, Marlinghaus E, Melchert F, Volz-Köster S and Volz J 2008 Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 277 143
[10] Murat F J L and Gelet A 2008 Curr. Urol. Rep. 9 113
[11] Zhou Y F 2011 World. J. Clin. Oncol. 2 8
[12] Nyborg W L, Hill C R and Bamber J C 2004 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117 15
[13] Damianou C and Hynynen K 1993 Ultrasound Med. Biol. 19 777
[14] Malinen M, Huttunen T, Kaipio J P and Hynynen K 2005 Phys. Med. Biol. 50 3473
[15] Zhou Y, Kargl S G and Hwang J H 2011 Ultrasound Med. Biol. 37 1457
[16] Fan X and Hynynen K 1996 Ultrasound Med. Biol. 22 471
[17] Curiel L, Chavrier F, Gignoux B, Pichardo S, Chesnais S and Chapelon J Y 2004 Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 42 44
[18] Damianou C A, Sanghvi N T, Fry F J and Maass-Moreno R 1997 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102 628
[19] Patel U H, Babbs C F, Deford J A, Bleyer M W, Marchosky J A and Moran C J 1992 Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 30 651
[20] Clarke R L, Bush N L and ter Haar G R 2003 Ultrasound Med. Biol. 29 127
[21] Zderic V, Keshavarzi A, Vaezy S and Martin R W 2004 Ultrasound Med. Biol. 30 61
[22] Bamber J C and Hill C R 1979 Ultrasound Med. Biol. 5 149
[23] Choi M J, Guntur S R, Lee J M, Paeng D G and Lee K I L 2011 Ultrasound Med. Biol. 37 2000
[24] Liu D, Xu Z Y, Xia R M, Shou W D and Qian D C 2007 Technic. Acoust. 26 62 (in Chinese)
[25] Soneson J E 2010 The 9th International Symposium on Therapeutic Ultrasound, September 24–26, 2009, Aix-en-Provence, France, p. 164
[26] Su H D, Guo G P, Ma Q Y, Tu J and Zhang D 2017 Chin. Phys. B 26 054302
[27] Kullervo H 1991 Ultrasound. Med. Biol. 17 157
[28] Haddadi S Ahmadian M T 2018 J. Ultras. Med. 37 1481
[29] Guo G P, Su H D, Ding H and Ma Q Y 2017 Acta Phys. Sin. 66 164301 (in Chinese)
[30] Palmeri M L, Sharma A C, Bouchard R R, Nightingale R W and Nightingale K R 2005 IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 52 1699
[31] Hou G Y, Marquet F, Wang S and Konofagou E E 2014 Phys. Med. Biol. 59 1121
[32] Pennes H H 1948 J. Appl. Physiol. 1 93
[33] Galwey A K and Brown M E 2002 Thermochim. Acta 386 91
[34] Guntur S R, Lee K I, Paeng D G, Coleman A J and Choi M J 2013 Ultrasound Med. Biol. 39 1771
[35] Tan Q L, Zou X, Ding Y J and Zhao X M 2015 Ultrasound Med. Biol. 41 806
[36] Guntur S R and Choi M J 2015 Ultrasound Med. Biol. 41 806
[1] Estimation of temperature elevation generated by ultrasonic irradiation in biological tissues using the thermal wave method
Liu Xiao-Zhou, Zhu Yi, Zhang Fei, Gong Xiu-Fen. Chin. Phys. B, 2013, 22(2): 024301.
No Suggested Reading articles found!