ELECTROMAGNETISM, OPTICS, ACOUSTICS, HEAT TRANSFER, CLASSICAL MECHANICS, AND FLUID DYNAMICS |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Electromagnetically induced transparency and electromagnetically induced absorption in Y-type system |
Kalan Mal1,2, Khairul Islam2, Suman Mondal2, Dipankar Bhattacharyya3, Amitava Bandyopadhyay2 |
1 Department of Physics, Suri Vidyasagar College, Suri, PIN 731101, West Bengal, India; 2 Departmet of Physics, Visva-Bharati, Santiniketan, PIN 731235, West Bengal, India; 3 Department of Physics, Santipur College, Santipur, PIN 741404, West Bengal, India |
|
|
Abstract The propagation of a probe field through a four-level Y-type atomic system is described in the presence of two additional coherent radiation fields, namely, the control field and the coupling field. An expression for the probe response is derived analytically from the optical Bloch equations under steady state condition to study the absorptive properties of the system under probe field propagation through an ensemble of stationary atoms as well as in a Doppler broadened atomic vapor medium. The most striking result is the conversion of electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT) into electromagnetically induced absorption (EIA) as we start switching from weak probe regime to strong probe regime. The dependence of this conversion on residual Doppler averaging due to wavelength mismatch is also shown by choosing the coupling transition as a Rydberg transition.
|
Received: 19 February 2020
Revised: 03 March 2020
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
42.50.Gy
|
(Effects of atomic coherence on propagation, absorption, and Amplification of light; electromagnetically induced transparency and Absorption)
|
|
32.10.Fn
|
(Fine and hyperfine structure)
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
Amitava Bandyopadhyay
E-mail: m2amitava@gmail.com
|
Cite this article:
Kalan Mal, Khairul Islam, Suman Mondal, Dipankar Bhattacharyya, Amitava Bandyopadhyay Electromagnetically induced transparency and electromagnetically induced absorption in Y-type system 2020 Chin. Phys. B 29 054211
|
[1] |
Agap'ev B D, Gornyǐ M B, Matisov B G and Rozhdestvenskiǐ Y V 1993 Phys.-Usp. 36 763
|
[2] |
Zhao S M and Zhuang P 2014 Chin. Phys. B 23 054203
|
[3] |
Zhang Y, Qu S and Gu S 2012 Opt. Express 20 6400
|
[4] |
Qu S P, Zhang Y and Gu S H 2013 Chin. Phys. B 22 099501
|
[5] |
Boller K J, Imamoglu A and Harris S E 1991 Phys. Rev. Lett. 66 2593
|
[6] |
Harris S E 1997 Phys. Today 50 36
|
[7] |
Jiang X, Zhang H and Wang Y 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 034204
|
[8] |
Cheng H, Wang H M, Zhang S S, Xin P P, Luo J and Liu H P 2017 Opt. Exp. 25 33575
|
[9] |
Lezama A, Barreiro S and Akulshin A M 1999 Phys. Rev. A 59 4732
|
[10] |
Zhao Y T, Zhao J M, Xiao L T, Yin W B and Jia S T 2004 Chin. Phys. Lett. 21 76
|
[11] |
Agarwal G S 1991 Phys. Rev. A 44 R28
|
[12] |
Hamedi H R, Juzeliūnas G, Raheli A and Sahrai M 2013 Opt. Commun. 311 261
|
[13] |
Agarwal G S, Dey T N and Menon S 2001 Phys. Rev. A 64 053809
|
[14] |
Zhang Q, Qu G H, Tang Y H, Jin K and Ji W L 2012 Chin. Phys. B 21 023201
|
[15] |
Mondal S, Ghosh A, Islam K and Bandyopadhyay A 2019 Laser Phys. 29 075204
|
[16] |
Yan L S, Lin L, Belisle A, Wey S and Yao X S 2007 J. Opt. Network. 6 13
|
[17] |
Novikova I, Phillips D F and Walsworth R L 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 173604
|
[18] |
Harris S E, Field J E and Imamoglu A 1990 Phys. Rev. Lett. 64 1107
|
[19] |
Mondal S, Ghosh A, Islam K and Bandyopadhyay A 2019 Opt. Commun. 435 378
|
[20] |
Heinze G, Hubrich C and Halfmann T 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 033601
|
[21] |
Dong H, Xu D Z, Huang J F and Sun C P 2012 Light: Sci. & Appl. 1 e2
|
[22] |
Xu L, Gong Z R, Tao M J and Ai Q 2018 Phys. Rev. E 97 042124
|
[23] |
Phillips D F, Fleischhauer A, Mair A and Walsworth R L 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 783
|
[24] |
Vemuri G, Agarwal G S and Nageswara Rao B D 1996 Phys. Rev. A 53 2842
|
[25] |
Wang C, Jiang X, Zhao G, Zhang M, Hsu C W, Peng B, Stone A D, Jiang L and Yang L 2020 Nat. Phys.
|
[26] |
Agarwal G S and Harshawardhan W 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 1039
|
[27] |
Gao J Y, Yang S H, Wang D, Guo X Z, Chen K X, Jiang Y and Zhao B 2000 Phys. Rev. A 61 023401
|
[28] |
Mirza A B and Singh S 2012 Phys. Rev. A 85 053837
|
[29] |
Bharti V and Wasan A 2014 Opt. Commun. 324 238
|
[30] |
Safari L, Iablonskyi D and Fratini F 2014 Eur. Phys. J. D 68 27
|
[31] |
Hao L, Xue Y, Fan J, Jiao Y, Zhao J and Jia J 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 053202
|
[32] |
Wang H M, Cheng H, Zhang S S, Xin P P, Xu Z S and Liu H P 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 094205
|
[33] |
Dai S, Li K, Zhai Y, Xia W, Wang Q, Xiong W, Qi X and Chen X 2017 Chin. Phys. Lett. 34 13201
|
[34] |
Steck D A 2015 Rubidium 87 D line data version 2.1.5 2015
|
[35] |
Moon H S and Jeong T 2014 Phys. Rev. A 89 033822
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|