|
|
Optimal estimation of the amplitude of signal with known frequency in the presence of thermal noise |
Jie Luo(罗杰)1, Jun Ke(柯俊)1, Yi-Chuan Liu(柳一川)1, Xiang-Li Zhang(张祥莉)1, Wei-Ming Yin(殷蔚明)1, Cheng-Gang Shao(邵成刚)2 |
1 School of Mechanical Engineering and Electronic Information, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China;
2 MOE Key Laboratory of Fundamental Physical Quantities Measurement, School of Physics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology(HUST), Wuhan 430074, China |
|
|
Abstract In the torsion pendulum experiments, the thermal noise sets the most fundamental limit to the accurate estimation of the amplitude of the signal with known frequency. The variance of the conventional method can meet the limit only when the measurement time is much longer than the relaxation time of the pendulum. By using the maximum likelihood estimation and the equation-of-motion filter operator, we propose an optimal (minimum variance, unbiased) amplitude estimation method without limitation of the measurement time, where thermal fluctuation is the leading noise. While processing the experimental data tests of the Newtonian gravitational inverse square law, the variance of our method has been improved than before and the measurement time of determining the amplitude with this method has been reduced about half than before for the same uncertainty. These results are significant for the torsion experiment when the measurement time is limited.
|
Received: 14 May 2019
Revised: 21 July 2019
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
04.80.Cc
|
(Experimental tests of gravitational theories)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11575160). |
Corresponding Authors:
Cheng-Gang Shao
E-mail: cgshao@mail.hust.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Jie Luo(罗杰), Jun Ke(柯俊), Yi-Chuan Liu(柳一川), Xiang-Li Zhang(张祥莉), Wei-Ming Yin(殷蔚明), Cheng-Gang Shao(邵成刚) Optimal estimation of the amplitude of signal with known frequency in the presence of thermal noise 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 100401
|
[1] |
Saulson P R 1990 Phys. Rev. D 42 2437
|
[2] |
Yang S Q, Zhan B F, Wang Q L, Shao C G, Tu L C, Tan W H and Luo J 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 081101
|
[3] |
Tan W H, Yang S Q, Shao C G, Li J, Du A B, Zhan B F, Wang Q L, Luo P S, Tu L C and Luo J 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 131101
|
[4] |
Zhu L, Liu Q, Zhao H H, Gong Q L, Yang S Q, Luo P S, Shao C G, Wang Q L, Tu L C and Luo J 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 261101
|
[5] |
Shao C G, Chen Y F, Tan Y J, Yang S Q, Luo J, Tobar M E, Long J C, Weisman E and Kostelecký V A 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 011102
|
[6] |
Wang D H, Luo J and Luo K 2006 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 77 104501
|
[7] |
Chen Y T and Cook A H 1990 Class. Quantum Grav. 7 1225
|
[8] |
Luo J, Shao C G, Tian Y and Wang D H 2013 Phys. Lett. A 377 1397
|
[9] |
Uhlenbeck G E and Goudamit S 1929 Phys. Rev. 34 145
|
[10] |
Balazs N L 1958 Phys. Rev. 109 232
|
[11] |
Ritter R C, Winkler L I and Gillies G T 1999 Meas. Sci. Technol. 10 499
|
[12] |
Braginsky V B and Manukin A B 1978 Am. J. Phys. 46 2
|
[13] |
Nyquist H 1928 Phys. Rev. 32 110
|
[14] |
Luo J and Wang D H 2009 Class. Quantum Grav. 26 195005
|
[15] |
Callen H B and Welton T A 1951 Phys. Rev. 83 34
|
[16] |
Goldblum C G and Ritter R C 1988 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 59 778
|
[17] |
Tian Y L and Shao C G 2004 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 75 1971
|
[18] |
Shao C G, Luan E J and Luo J 2003 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 74 2849
|
[19] |
Michael W M, Jason H S and Paul E B 2005 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 76 085106
|
[20] |
Ritter R C and Gillies G T 1985 Phys. Rev. A 31 995
|
[21] |
Zhan W Z, Luo J, Shao C G, Zheng D, Yin W M and Wang D H 2017 Chin. Phys. B 26 090401
|
[22] |
Wu W H, Tian Y, Xue C, Luo J and Shao C G 2017 Chin. Phys. B 26 040401
|
[23] |
Lamoreaux S K and Buttler W T 2005 Phys. Rev. E 71 036109
|
[24] |
Hoyle C D, Kapner D J, Heckel B R, Adelberger E G, Gundlach J H, Schmidt U and Swanson H E 2004 Phys. Rev. D 70 042004
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|