PHYSICS OF GASES, PLASMAS, AND ELECTRIC DISCHARGES |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Schamel equation in an inhomogeneous magnetized sheared flow plasma with q-nonextensive trapped electrons |
Shaukat Ali Shan, Qamar-ul-Haque |
Theoretical Physics Division(TPD), PINSTECH, P. O. Nilore, Islamabad, Pakistan |
|
|
Abstract An investigation is carried out for understanding the properties of ion-acoustic (IA) solitary waves in an inhomogeneous magnetized electron-ion plasma with field-aligned sheared flow under the impact of q-nonextensive trapped electrons. The Schamel equation and its stationary solution in the form of solitary waves are obtained for this inhomogeneous plasma. It is shown that the amplitude of IA solitary waves increases with higher trapping efficiency (β), while the width remains almost the same. Further, it is found that the amplitude of the solitary waves decreases with enhanced normalized drift speed, shear flow parameter and the population of the energetic particles. The size of the nonlinear solitary structures is calculated to be a few hundred meters and it is pointed out that the present results are useful to understand the solar wind plasma.
|
Received: 28 August 2017
Revised: 30 October 2017
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
52.35.Fp
|
(Electrostatic waves and oscillations (e.g., ion-acoustic waves))
|
|
52.25.Dg
|
(Plasma kinetic equations)
|
|
52.35.Qz
|
(Microinstabilities (ion-acoustic, two-stream, loss-cone, beam-plasma, drift, ion- or electron-cyclotron, etc.))
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
Shaukat Ali Shan
E-mail: shaukatshan@gmail.com
|
About author: 52.35.Fp; 52.25.Dg; 52.35.Qz |
Cite this article:
Shaukat Ali Shan, Qamar-ul-Haque Schamel equation in an inhomogeneous magnetized sheared flow plasma with q-nonextensive trapped electrons 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 025203
|
[1] |
Ganguli G, Slinker S, Gavrishchaka V and Scales W 2002 Phys. Plasmas 9 2321
|
[2] |
Schrijver C J, Title A M, Berger T E, Fletcher L, Hurlburt N E, Nightingale R W, Shine R A, Tarbell T D, Wolfson J, Golub L, Bookbinder JA, DeLuca E E, McMullen R A, Warren H P, Kankelborg C C, HandyB N and De Pontieu B 1999 Sol. Phys. 187 261
|
[3] |
Amatucci W E, Walker D N, Ganguli G, Antoniades J A, Duncan D,Bowles J H, Gavrishchaka V and Koepke M E 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 1978
|
[4] |
Saleem H and Eliasson B 2011 Phys. Plasmas 18 052103
|
[5] |
Shan S A, Haque Q and Saleem H 2014 Astrophys. Space Sci. 349 285
|
[6] |
Ishiguro S, Sato T and Takamaru H 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 4761
|
[7] |
Noriaki M, Toshiro K, Seiji I and Rikizo H 2004 J. Plasma Fusion Res. Ser. 6 707
|
[8] |
D'Angelo N 1965 Phys. Fluids 8 1748
|
[9] |
Koepke M E, Teodorescu C and Reynolds E W 2003 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 45 869
|
[10] |
Koepke M 2004 Phys. Scr. T107 182
|
[11] |
Willing J, Merlino R L and D'Angelo N 1997 Phys. Lett. A 236 223
|
[12] |
Saleem H, Vranjes J and Poedts S 2007 Phys. Plasmas 14 072104
|
[13] |
Gavrishchaka V V, Ganguli S B and Ganguli G I 1999 J. Geophys. Res. 104 12683
|
[14] |
Washimi H and Taniuti T 1966 Phys. Rev. Lett. 17 996
|
[15] |
Williams G and Kourakis I 2013 Phys. Plasmas 20 122311
|
[16] |
Shan S A and Saleem H 2014 Astrophys. Space Sci. 349 215
|
[17] |
Saleem H, Ali S and Haque Q 2015 Phys. Plasmas 22 084509
|
[18] |
Morse R Land Nielson C W 1969 Phys. Rev. Lett. 23 1087
|
[19] |
Kako M, Taniuti T and Watanabe T 1971 J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 31 1820
|
[20] |
Bernstein I B, Greene J M and Kruskal M D 1957 Phys. Rev. 108 546
|
[21] |
Schamel H 1972 Plasma Phys. 14 905
|
[22] |
Schamel H 1973 J. Plasma Phys. 9 377
|
[23] |
Schamel H 1975 J. Plasma Phys. 13 139
|
[24] |
Schamel H 1986 Phys. Rep. 140 161
|
[25] |
Aoutou K, Tribeche M and Zerguini T H 2009 Phys. Plasmas 16 083701
|
[26] |
Gosling J T, Hundhausen A J, Pizzo V and Asbridge J R 1972 J. Geophys. Res. 77 5442
|
[27] |
Hundhausen A J 1973 J. Geophys. Res. 78 1528
|
[28] |
Vocks C and Mann G 2003 Astrophys. J. 593 1134
|
[29] |
Tsallis C 1988 J. Stat. Phys. 52 479
|
[30] |
Tribeche M, Djebarni L and Schamel H 2012 Phys. Lett. A 376 3164
|
[31] |
Gurnett D A and Frank L A 1978 J. Geophys. Res. 83 58
|
[32] |
Leubner M P 2002 Astrophys. Space Sci. 282 573
|
[33] |
Silva R Jr, Plastino A R and Lima J A S 1998 Phys. Lett. A 249 401
|
[34] |
Lima J A S, Jr Silva R and Santos J 2000 Phys. Rev. E 61 3260
|
[35] |
Lima J A S, Silva R and Santos J 2002 Astro. Astrophys. 396 309
|
[36] |
Shan S A, Rehman A and Mushtaq A 2016 Phys. Plasmas 23 092118
|
[37] |
Williams G, Verheest F, Hellberg M A, Anowar M G M and KourakisI 2014 Phys. Plasmas 21 092103
|
[38] |
Woo R 1996 Nature 379 321
|
[39] |
Gimholt J 1998 Analyzer of Space Plasma and Energetic Atoms,www.aspera-3.org/restricted/PartI.pdf
|
[40] |
Peratt A L 1996 Astrophys. Space Sci. 242 93
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|