INTERDISCIPLINARY PHYSICS AND RELATED AREAS OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Comparison of the photoemission behaviour between negative electron affinity GaAs and GaN photocathodes |
Zhang Yi-Jun(张益军),Zou Ji-Jun(邹继军),Wang Xiao-Hui(王晓晖), Chang Ben-Kang(常本康)†, Qian Yun-Sheng(钱芸生), Zhang Jun-Ju(张俊举),and Gao Pin(高频) |
Institute of Electronic Engineering and Optoelectronic Technology, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China |
|
|
Abstract In view of the important application of GaAs and GaN photocathodes in electron sources, differences in photoemission behaviour, namely the activation process and quantum yield decay, between the two typical types of III–V compound photocathodes have been investigated using a multi-information measurement system. The activation experiment shows that a surface negative electron affinity state for the GaAs photocathode can be achieved by the necessary Cs–O two-step activation and by Cs activation alone for the GaN photocathode. In addition, a quantum yield decay experiment shows that the GaN photocathode exhibits better stability and a longer lifetime in a demountable vacuum system than the GaAs photocathode. The results mean that GaN photocathodes are more promising candidates for electron source emitter use in comparison with GaAs photocathodes.
|
Received: 26 October 2010
Revised: 01 December 2010
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
85.60.Ha
|
(Photomultipliers; phototubes and photocathodes)
|
|
73.61.Ey
|
(III-V semiconductors)
|
|
73.20.At
|
(Surface states, band structure, electron density of states)
|
|
79.60.-i
|
(Photoemission and photoelectron spectra)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 60801036 and 61067001), the Research and Innovation Plan for Graduate Students of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (Grant No. CX09B_096Z), and the Research Foundation of Nanjing University of Science and Technology (Grant No. 2010ZYTS032). |
Cite this article:
Zhang Yi-Jun(张益军), Zou Ji-Jun(邹继军), Wang Xiao-Hui(王晓晖), Chang Ben-Kang(常本康), Qian Yun-Sheng(钱芸生), Zhang Jun-Ju(张俊举), and Gao Pin(高频) Comparison of the photoemission behaviour between negative electron affinity GaAs and GaN photocathodes 2011 Chin. Phys. B 20 048501
|
[1] |
Spicer W E 1977 Appl. Phys. 12 115
|
[2] |
Ruan C J 2003 Chin. Phys. 12 483
|
[3] |
Liu Z, Sun Y, Peterson S and Pianetta P 2008 Appl. Phys. Lett. 92 241107
|
[4] |
Li Q, Hao L and Pang W N 2008 Acta Phys. Sin. 57 172 (in Chinese)
|
[5] |
Qiao J L, Chang B K, Du X Q, Niu J and Zou J J 2010 Acta Phys. Sin. 59 2855 (in Chinese)
|
[6] |
Zhang Y J, Chang B K, Yang Z, Niu J and Zou J J 2009 Chin. Phys. B 18 4541
|
[7] |
André J P, Guittard P, Hallais J and Piaget C 1981 J. Cryst. Growth 55 235
|
[8] |
Shahedipour F S, Ulmer M P, Wessels B W, Joseph C L and Nihashi T 2002 IEEE J. Quantum Electron 38 333
|
[9] |
Pastuszka S, Terekhov A S and Wolf A 1996 Appl. Surf. Sci. 99 361
|
[10] |
Machuca F, Liu Z, Sun Y, Pianetta P, Spicer W E and Pease R F W 2002 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 20 2721
|
[11] |
Martinelli R U and Fisher D E 1974 Proc. IEEE 62 1339
|
[12] |
Wight D R, Oliver P E, Prentice T and Steward V W 1981 J. Cryst. Growth 55 183
|
[13] |
Bandic Z Z, Bridger P M, Piquette E C and McGill T C 2000 it Solid-State Electron 44 221
|
[14] |
Liu Z, Sun Y, Machuca F, Pianetta P, Spicer W E and Pease R F W 2003 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 21 1953
|
[15] |
Qiao J L, Tian S, Chang B K, Du X Q and Gao P 2009 Acta Phys. Sin. 58 5847 (in Chinese)
|
[16] |
Moré S, Tanaka S, Tanaka S, Fujii Y and Kamada M 2003 it Surf. Sci. 527 41
|
[17] |
Topping J 1927 Proc. R. Soc. London A 114 67
|
[18] |
Liu Z 2005 Surface Characterization of Semiconductor Photocathode Structures (Ph. D. Thesis) California: Stanford University
|
[19] |
Machuca F 2003 A Thin Film p-type GaN Photocathode: Prospect for a High Performance Electron Emitter (Ph. D. Thesis) California: Stanford University
|
[20] |
Su C Y, Spicer W E and Lindau I 1983 J. Appl. Phys. 54 1413
|
[21] |
Wada T, Nitta T, Nomura T, Miyao M and Hagino M 1990 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 29 2087
|
[22] |
Durek D, Frommberger F, Reichelt T and Westermann M 1999 it Appl. Surf. Sci. 143 319
|
[23] |
Sen P, Pickard D S, Schneider J E, Mccord M A, Pease R F, Baum A W and Costello K A 1998 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 16 3380
|
[24] |
Du X Q, Chang B K, Qian Y S, Qiao J L and Tian J 2010 Acta Opt. Sin. 30 1734 (in Chinese)
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|