|
|
Parametric down-conversion with local operation and two-way classical communication |
Liu Qiang(刘强)† and Tan Yong-Gang(谭勇刚)‡ |
Physics and Information Engineering Department, Luoyang Normal College, Luoyang 471022, China |
|
|
Abstract The decoy-state quantum key distribution protocol suggested by Adachi et al. (Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 180503 (2007)) is proven to be secure and feasible with current techniques. It owns two attractive merits, i.e., its longer secure transmission distance and more convenient operation design. In this paper, we first improve the protocol with the aid of local operation and two-way classical communication (2-LOCC). After our modifications, the secure transmission distance is increased by about 20 km, which will make the protocol more practicable.
|
Received: 01 October 2010
Revised: 09 November 2010
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
03.65.-w
|
(Quantum mechanics)
|
|
03.67.-a
|
(Quantum information)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the Young Scientists Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 10905028/A050104), the Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province, China (Grant No. 092300410188), the Science Foundation of Hennan Provincial Education Department (Grant No. 2010A140010) and Youth Fund of Luoyang Normal College. |
Cite this article:
Liu Qiang(刘强) and Tan Yong-Gang(谭勇刚) Parametric down-conversion with local operation and two-way classical communication 2011 Chin. Phys. B 20 040303
|
[1] |
Bennett C H and Brassard G 1984 Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems and Signal Processing, Bangalore, India (IEEE, New York), 1984 p. 175
|
[2] |
Gobby C, Yuan Z L and Shields A J 2004 Appl. Phys. Lett. 84 3762
|
[3] |
Stucki D, Gisin N, Guinnard O, Ribordy G and Zbinden H 2002 New J. Phys. 4 41
|
[4] |
Kimura T, Nambu Y, Hatanaka T, Tomita A, Kosaka H and Nakamura K 2004 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 43 L1217
|
[5] |
Zhao Y, Qi B, Ma X, Lo H K and Qian L 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 070502
|
[6] |
Peng C Z, Zhang J, Yang D, Gao W B, Ma H X, Yin H, Zeng H P, Yang T, Wang X B and Pan J W 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 010505
|
[7] |
Hiskett P A, Rosenberg D, Peterson C G, Hughes R J, Nam S W, Lita A E, Miller A J and Nordholt J E 2006 New J. Phys. 8 193
|
[8] |
Brassard G, Lütkenhaus N, Mor T and Sanders B C 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 1330
|
[9] |
Lo H K, Ma X and Chen K 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 230504
|
[10] |
Ma X, Qi B, Zhao Y and Lo H K 2005 Phys. Rev. A 72 012326
|
[11] |
Wang X B 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 230503
|
[12] |
Hwang W Y 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 057901
|
[13] |
Mauerer W and Silberhorn C 2007 Phys. Rev. A 75 050305(R)
|
[14] |
Adachi Y, Yamamoto T, Koashi M and Imoto N 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 180503
|
[15] |
Gottesman D and Lo H K 2003 IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 49 457
|
[16] |
Chau H F 2002 Phys. Rev. A 66 060302(R)
|
[17] |
Gerd K, Vollbrecht H and Verstraete F 2005 Phys. Rev. A 71 062325
|
[18] |
Ma X, Fung C H F, Dupuis F, Chen K, Tamaki K and Lo H K 2006 Phys. Rev. A 74 032330
|
[19] |
Lütkenhaus N 2000 Phys. Rev. A 61 052304
|
[20] |
Yurke B and Potasek M 1987 Phys. Rev. A 36 3464
|
[21] |
Gottesman D, Lo H K, Lütkenhaus N and Preskill J 2004 Quantum Information Comput. 4 325
|
[22] |
Lo H K 2005 Quantum Information Comput. 5 413 endfootnotesize
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|