|
|
Single electron loss in the collisions of C3 + and atomic hydrogen |
Liu Hui-Ping(刘会平), Ouyang Xiao-Ping(欧阳晓平), Hu Hua-Si(胡华四)†, and Su Guang-Hui(苏光辉)‡ |
State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Flow in Power Engineering, Department of Nuclear Science and Technology, Xi'anjiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China |
|
|
Abstract This paper studies the projectile electron loss cross sections of C3 + colliding with atomic hydrogen in the frame work of extended over-barrier model at intermediate velocities (25 keV/u–600 keV/u). The electron loss is calculated in terms of the interaction between the screened target nucleus and the active projectile electron and of the interaction between projectile electron and target electron. Compared with the convergent close-coupling calculations, screening and anti-screening calculations, this model satisfactorily reproduces the experimentally obtained energy dependence of the electron-impact ionisation cross sections and the single electron loss cross sections over the energy range investigated here.
|
Received: 15 December 2009
Revised: 22 January 2010
Accepted manuscript online:
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 10975113 and 10675096). |
Cite this article:
Liu Hui-Ping(刘会平), Ouyang Xiao-Ping(欧阳晓平), Hu Hua-Si(胡华四), and Su Guang-Hui(苏光辉) Single electron loss in the collisions of C3 + and atomic hydrogen 2010 Chin. Phys. B 19 093401
|
[1] |
Shah M B, Goffe T V and Gilbody H B 1977 J. Phys. B 10 L723
|
[2] |
Shah M B and Gilbody H B 1991 J. Phys. B 24 977
|
[3] |
de Castro Faria N V, Freire Jr F L and de Pinho A G 1988 Phys. Rev. A 37 280
|
[4] |
Shah M B, Goffe T V and Gilbody H B 1978 J. Phys. B 11 L233
|
[5] |
Wu W, Wong K L, Ali R, Chen C Y, Cocke C L, Frohne V, Giese J P, Raphaelian M, Walch B, Dõrner R, Mergel V, Schmidt-Bõcking H and Meyerhof W E 1994 Phys. Rev. Lett. 72 3170
|
[6] |
SantÁnna M M, Smelo W, Santos A C F, Sigaud G M, Montenegro E C, Shah M B and Meyehof W E 1998 Phys. Rev. A 58 1204
|
[7] |
Melo W S, SantÁnna M M, Santos A C F, Sigaud G M and Montenegro E C 1999 Phys. Rev. A 60 1124
|
[8] |
Montenegro E C, Wilson Melo S, Meyerhof W E and de Pinho A E 1992 Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 3033
|
[9] |
Chen X M, Lu Y X, Ding B W, Liu Y W, Cui Y, Gao Z M, Fu H B, Du J and Shao J X 2007 Chin. Phys. 16 2384
|
[10] |
Gao Z M, Chen X M, Liu Z Y, Ding B W, Lu Y X Fu H B, Liu Y W, Cui Y, Shao J X, Zhang H Q and Sun G Z 2007 Acta. Phys. Sin. 56 2079 (in Chinese)
|
[11] |
Bates D R and Griffing G 1953 Proc. Soc. London Sect. A 66 961
|
[12] |
Montenegro E C and Meyerhof W E 1991 Phys. Rev. A 44 7229
|
[13] |
Montenegro E C and Meyerhof W E 1992 Phys. Rev. A 46 5506
|
[14] |
Grande P L, Schiwietz G, Sigaud G M and Montenegro E C 1996 Phys. Rev. A 54 2983
|
[15] |
Voitkiv A B, Sigaud G M and Montenegro E C 1999 Phys. Rev. A 59 2794
|
[16] |
Montanari C C, Miraglia J E and Arista N R 2003 Phys. Rev. A 67 062702
|
[17] |
Olson R E 2001 Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 464 93
|
[18] |
Olson R E, Watson R L, Horval V and Zaharakis K E 2002 J. Phys. B 35 1893
|
[19] |
Bohr N 1948 K. Dan. Vidensk. Selsk. Mat. Phys. Meddr. 18 1
|
[20] |
Bohr N and Lindhard J 1954 K. Dan. Vidensk, Selsk, Mat-Phys. Meddr. 28 7
|
[21] |
Sattin F 2000 Phys. Rev. A 64 034704
|
[22] |
Ostrovsky V N 1995 J. Phys. B 28 3901
|
[23] |
Sattin F 2000 Phys. Rev. A 62 042711
|
[24] |
Crandall D H, Phaneuf R A and Taylor P O 1978 Phys. Rev. A 18 1911
|
[25] |
Bray I 1995 J. Phys. B 28 L247
|
[26] |
Goffe T V, Shah M B and Gilbody H B 1979 J. Phys. B 12 3763
|
[27] |
Dõrner R, Mergel V, Ali R, Buck U, Cocke C L, Froschauer K, Jagutzki O, Lencians S, Meyerhof W E, Nüttgens S, Olson R E, Schmidt-B?cking H, Spielberger H L, Tõkesi K, Ullrich J, Unverzagt M and Wu W 1994 Phys. Rev. Lett. 72 3166 endfootnotesize
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|