|
|
|
Mixed convectional and chemical reactive flow of nanofluid with slanted MHD on moving permeable stretching/shrinking sheet through nonlinear radiation, energy omission |
| Saleem Nasir1,†, Sekson Sirisubtawee1, Pongpol Juntharee1, and Taza Gul2 |
1. Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Applied Science, King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok, Bangkok 10800, Thailand;
2. Department of Mathematics, City University of Science and Information Technology, Peshawar, Pakistan |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Hybrid nanofluids are remarkable functioning liquids that are intended to reduce the energy loss while maximizing the heat transmission. In the involvement of suction and nonlinear thermal radiation effects, this study attempted to explore the energy transmission features of the inclined magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) stagnation flow of CNTs-hybrid nanofluid across the nonlinear permeable stretching or shrinking sheet. This work also included some noteworthy features like chemical reactions, variable molecular diffusivity, quadratic convection, viscous dissipation, velocity slip and heat omission assessment. Employing appropriate similarity components, the model equations were modified to ODEs and computed by using the HAM technique. The impact of various relevant flow characteristics on movement, heat and concentration profiles was investigated and plotted on a graph. Considering various model factors, the significance of drag friction, heat and mass transfer rate were also computed in tabular and graphical form. This leads to the conclusion that such factors have a considerable impact on the dynamics of fluid as well as other engineering measurements of interest. Furthermore, viscous forces are dominated by increasing the values of $\lambda_{\rm p} ,\delta_{\rm m} $ and $\delta_{\rm q} $, and as a result, ${F}'(\xi)$ accelerates while the opposite trend is observed for $M$ and $\phi $. The drag friction is boosted by the augmentation $M$, $\lambda_{\rm p} $ and $\phi $, but the rate of heat transfer declined. According to our findings, hybrid nanoliquid effects dominate that of ordinary nanofluid in terms of ${F}'(\xi)$, $\varTheta ( \xi )$ and $\phi (\xi)$ profiles. The HAM and the numerical technique (shooting method) were found to be in good agreement.
|
Received: 09 May 2022
Revised: 15 June 2022
Accepted manuscript online:
|
|
PACS:
|
44.15.+a
|
(Channel and internal heat flow)
|
| |
47.27.nd
|
(Channel flow)
|
| |
47.15.gm
|
(Thin film flows)
|
|
| Fund: This research was funded by King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok with Contract no. KMUTNBPost-65-07. |
Corresponding Authors:
Saleem Nasir,E-mail:saleemnasir85@gmail.com
E-mail: saleemnasir85@gmail.com
|
Cite this article:
Saleem Nasir, Sekson Sirisubtawee, Pongpol Juntharee, and Taza Gul Mixed convectional and chemical reactive flow of nanofluid with slanted MHD on moving permeable stretching/shrinking sheet through nonlinear radiation, energy omission 2024 Chin. Phys. B 33 050204
|
[1] Choi, S U and Eastman J A 1995 Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles (No. ANL/MSD/CP-84938; CONF-951135- 29). Argonne National Lab., IL (United States)
[2] Rawat, S K, Mishra A and Kumar M 2019 Multidiscipline Mod. Mater. Struct. 15 714
[3] Xu H and Xing Z 2017 Int. Comm. Heat Mass Transfer. 89 73
[4] Xu H, Gong L, Huang S and Xu M 2015 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer. 83 399
[5] Xu H J, Xing Z B, Wang F Q and Cheng Z M 2019 Che. Eng. Sci. 195 462
[6] Xu H, Xing Z and Vafai K 2019 Int. J Heat Fluid Flow 77 242
[7] Xing Z B, Han X, Ke H, Zhang Q G, Zhang Z, Xu H and Wang F 2021 Int. J Num. Methods Heat Fluid Flow 31 27548
[8] Huang D, Wu Z and Sunden B 2016 Exp. Thermal Fluid Sci. 72 190
[9] Ahmad S, Nadeem S and Ullah N 2020 App. Nanoscience 10 5107
[10] Bakier A Y 2001 Int. Comm. Heat Mass Trans. 28 119
[11] Ishak A, Yacob N A and Bachok N 2011 Meccanica 46 795
[12] Sheikholeslami M, Ganji D D, Javed M Y and Ellahi R 2015 J. Magnet. Magnetic Mater. 374 36
[13] Mabood F, Abdel-Rahman R G and Lorenzini G 2016 J Eng. Thermophys. 25 536
[14] Yin J, Zhang X, Rehman M I U and Hamid A 2022 Case Stud. Thermal Eng. 30 101771
[15] Hiemen K 1911 Dinglers Polytech. J. 326 324
[16] Salem A M and Fathy R 2012 Chin. Phys. B 21 054701
[17] Homann F 1936 ZAMM J App. Math. Mechan.Zeitschrift Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik 16 153
[18] Soomro F A, Haq R U, Al-Mdallal Q M and Zhang Q 2018 Results Phys. 8 404
[19] Shen M, Wang F and Chen H 2015 Boundary Value Prob. 1 15
[20] Rehman F U, Nadeem S, Rehman H U and Haq R U 2018 Results Phys. 8 316
[21] Khashi’ie N S, Md Arifin N, Nazar R, Hafidzuddin E H, Wahi N and Pop I 2019 Energies 12 1
[22] Nasir S, Shah Z, Alrabaiah H, Islam S and Khan S N 2020 Phys. Scripta 96 14
[23] Waini I, Ishak A and Pop I 2020 Sci. Rep. 10 9296
[24] Waini I, Ishak A and Pop I 2022 Int. Comm. Heat Mass Transfer. 130 105804
[25] Das S K, Choi S U S, Yu W and Pradeep T 2008 Nanofluids: Science and Technology (John Wiley & Sons) p. 109
[26] Hassan M, Marin M, Alsharif A and Ellahi R 2018 Phys. Lett. A 382 2749
[27] Alamri S Z, Ellahi R, Shehzad N and Zeeshan A 2019 J. Mol. Liq. 273 292
[28] Kasaeian A, Daneshazarian R, Mahian O, Kolsi L, Chamkha A J, Wongwises S and Pop I 2017 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer. 107 778
[29] Menni Y, Chamkha A J and Azzi A 2019 Special Top. Rev. Porous Media 10 1
[30] Khanafer K and Vafai K 2019 J. Therm. Anal. Calorimetry 135 1479
[31] Vajravelu K, Prasad K V, Ng C O and Vaidya H 2017 Int. J. Mech. Mater. Eng. 12 1
[32] Shijun L 1998 Appl. Math. Mech. 19 957
[33] Xia W F, Ahmad S, Khan M N, Ahmad H, Rehman A, Baili J and Gia T N 2022 Case Stud. Thermal Eng. 32 101893
[34] Nandi S, Kumbhakar B, Seth G S, Chamkha A J 2021 Phys. Scr. 96 065206
|
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|
