Shedding vortex simulation method based on viscous compensation technology research
Hao Zhou(周昊)1, Lei Wang(汪雷)2, Zhang-Feng Huang(黄章峰)1,†, and Jing-Zhi Ren(任晶志)2
1 Department of Mechanics, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China; 2 Science and Technology on Space Physics Laboratory, China Academy of Launch Vehicle Technology, Beijing 100076, China
Abstract Owing to the influence of the viscosity of the flow field, the strength of the shedding vortex decreases gradually in the process of backward propagation. Large-scale vortexes constantly break up, forming smaller vortexes. In engineering, when numerical simulation of vortex evolution process is carried out, a large grid is needed to be arranged in the area of outflow field far from the boundary layer in order to ensure the calculation efficiency. As a result, small scale vortexes at the far end of the flow field cannot be captured by the sparse grid in this region, resulting in the dissipation or even disappearance of vortexes. In this paper, the effect of grid scale is quantified and compared with the viscous effect through theoretical derivation. The theoretical relationship between the mesh viscosity and the original viscosity of the flow field is established, and the viscosity term in the turbulence model is modified. This method proves to be able to effectively improve the intensity of small-scale shedding vortexes at the far end of the flow field under the condition of sparse grid. The error between the simulation results and the results obtained by using fine mesh is greatly reduced, the calculation time is shortened, and the high-precision and efficient simulation of the flow field is realized.
Fund: Project supported by the National Key Project, China (Grant No. GJXM92579) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 12072232).
Hao Zhou(周昊), Lei Wang(汪雷), Zhang-Feng Huang(黄章峰), and Jing-Zhi Ren(任晶志) Shedding vortex simulation method based on viscous compensation technology research 2022 Chin. Phys. B 31 044702
[1] Li Z Y, Zhang H B, Bailey S C, Hoagg J B and Alexandre M 2017 J. Comput. Phys. 345 111 [2] Ni X P, Cai R H and Cao X J 2003 Chin. J. Aeronaut. 24 15 [3] Zhao Q J, Jiang S and Li P 2017 Acta Aerodyn. Sin. 35 544 [4] Wu J, Qiu Y L, Shu C and Zhao N 2014 Phys. Fluids26 103601 [5] Mary I and Sagaut P 2002 AIAA J. 40 1139 [6] An H, Cheng L and Zhao M 2011 J. Fluid Mech. 666 77 [7] Sherwin J S, Meneghini R J and Serson D 2017 J. Fluid Mech. 826 714 [8] Yang A M, Liu J H and Weng P F 2009 Acta Aerodyn. Sin. 27 5 [9] Xu L, Yang A M and Weng P F 2010 Chin. J. Comput. Mech. 27 607 [10] Xia Z F and Yang Y 2001 Chin. J. Aeronaut. 32 1195 [11] Tang H S, Jones S C and Fotis S 2003 J. Comput. Phys. 191 567 [12] Markus D, Manuel K, Ewald K and Siegfried W 2007 AIAA J. 45 2062 [13] Nathan H 2002 J. Aircraft. 39 800 [14] Yin Y H, Yang P, Zhang Y F, Chen H X and Fu S 2020 Phys. Fluids32 105117 [15] Friederich T and Kloker M J 2012 J. Fluid Mech. 706 470 [16] Wilcox D C 1988 AIAA J. 220 1 [17] Wilcox D C 1993 AIAA J. 31 1414 [18] Menter F R 1994 AIAA J. 32 1598 [19] Zou S F, Liu L Q and Wu J Z 2021 Phys. Fluids33 036107 [20] Akira Y, Hiroyuki A, Yuichi M, Hitoshi F and Yasuhiro M A 2012 Phys. Fluids24 075109 [21] Yu C P, Hong R K, Xiao Z L and Chen S Y 2013 Phys. Fluids25 095101 [22] Keller H B 1978 Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 10 417 [23] Liu Y L, Zhao Y J and Liu Z X 2016 Build. Simul. 9 677 [24] Wang H D, Zhai Z Q John and Liu X 2014 Build. Simul. 7 155 [25] Xiao M J, Zhang Y S and Tian B L 2020 Phys. Fluids32 092104 [26] Norberg C 2001 J. Fluids Struct. 15 459 [27] Luo H and Spiegel S 2010 AIAA J. 48 2639 [28] Rezaeiravesh S snd Liefvendahl M 2018 Phys. Fluids30 055106 [29] Wang H D and Zhai Z Q John 2012 Build. Env. 52 107 [30] Henderson R 1997 J. Fluid Mech. 352 65 [31] Chen H Q and Huang M K 2000 Acta Aerodyn. Sin. 18 366 [32] Zhang W and Samtaney R 2016 Phys. Fluids28 044105
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.