PHYSICS OF GASES, PLASMAS, AND ELECTRIC DISCHARGES |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Three different low-temperature plasma-based methods for hydrophilicity improvement of polyethylene films at atmospheric pressure |
Chen Guang-Liang (陈光良)a, Zheng Xu (郑旭)a, Huang Jun (黄俊)a, Si Xiao-Lei (司晓蕾)a, Chen Zhi-Li (陈致力)a, Xue Fei (薛飞)a, Sylvain Masseyb |
a Key Laboratory of Advanced Textile Materials and Manufacturing Technology, and Engineering Research Centerfor Eco-Dyeing & Finishing of Textiles, Ministry of Education, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China; b Groupe en Sciences des Radiations, Faculté de médecine et des Sciences de la Santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec QC J1H 5N4, Canada |
|
|
Abstract Three different low-temperature plasma-based methods were used to improve the surface hydrophilicity of polyethylene (PE) films, and all the modification processes were carried out by employing an atmospheric pressure plasma jet (APPJ) system. (a) PE films were directly modified by APPJ using a gas mixture of He and O2. (b) Acrylic acid (AA) was introduced into the system and a polymer acrylic acid (PAA) coating was deposited onto the PE films. (c) AA was grafted onto the PE surface activated by plasma pre-treatment. It was found that the hydrophilicity of the PE films was significantly improved for all the three methods. However, the samples modified by Process (a) showed hydrophobicity recovery after a storage time of 20 days while no significant change was found in samples modified by Process (b) and Process (c). The Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) results indicated that the most intensive C=O peak was detected on the PE surface modified by Process (c). According to the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis, the ratios of oxygen-containing polar groups for samples modified by Process (b) and Process (c) were higher than that modified by Process (a).
|
Received: 01 August 2013
Revised: 05 September 2013
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
52.75.-d
|
(Plasma devices)
|
|
52.70.-m
|
(Plasma diagnostic techniques and instrumentation)
|
|
52.77.Fv
|
(High-pressure, high-current plasmas)
|
|
52.77.-j
|
(Plasma applications)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11175157), the Zhejiang Provincial Key Innovation Team, China (Grant No. 2012R10038), and the 521 Talent Project of Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, China. |
Corresponding Authors:
Chen Guang-Liang
E-mail: glchen1975@gmail.com
|
Cite this article:
Chen Guang-Liang (陈光良), Zheng Xu (郑旭), Huang Jun (黄俊), Si Xiao-Lei (司晓蕾), Chen Zhi-Li (陈致力), Xue Fei (薛飞), Sylvain Massey Three different low-temperature plasma-based methods for hydrophilicity improvement of polyethylene films at atmospheric pressure 2013 Chin. Phys. B 22 115206
|
[1] |
Sciarratta V, Vohrer U, Hegemann D, Müller M and Oehr C 2003 Surf. Coat. Technol. 174-175 805
|
[2] |
Xi Z Y, Xu Y Y, Zhu L P, Wang Y and Zhu B K 2009 J. Membr. Sci. 327 244
|
[3] |
Pfleging W, Torge M, Bruns M, Trouillet V, Welle A and Wilson S 2009 Appl. Surf. Sci. 255 5453
|
[4] |
Morent R, Geyter N D, Desmet T, Dubruel P and Leys C 2011 Plasma Process. Polym. 8 171
|
[5] |
Fang Z, Liu Y, Liu K, Shao T and Zhang C 2012 Vacuum 86 1305
|
[6] |
Vesel A and Mozetic M 2012 Vacuum 86 634
|
[7] |
Chaivan P, Pasaja N, Boonyawan D, Suanpoot P and Vilaithong T 2005 Surf. Coat. Technol. 193 356
|
[8] |
Kwon O J, Myung S W, Lee C S and Choi H S 2006 J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 295 409
|
[9] |
Amorosi C, Fouquet T, Toniazzo V, Ruch D, Averous L, Ball V and Michel M 2012 React. Func. Polym. 72 341
|
[10] |
Kuo Y L, Chang K H, Hung T S, Chen K S and Inagaki N 2010 Thin Solid Films 518 7568
|
[11] |
Poletti G, Orsini F, Raffaele-Addamo A, Riccardi C and Selli E 2003 Appl. Surf. Sci. 219 311
|
[12] |
Raffaele-Addamo A, Selli E, Barni R, Riccardi C, Orsini F, Poletti G, Meda L, Massafra M R and Marcandalli B 2006 Appl. Surf. Sci. 252 2265
|
[13] |
Wang C X, Xu H L, Liu Y and Qiu Y P 2008 Surf. Coat. Technol. 202 2775
|
[14] |
Laimer J, Haslinger S and Störi H 2007 Plasma Process. Polym. 4 S487
|
[15] |
Chen Q, Zhang Y F, Han E L and Ge Y J 2005 Plasma Source Sci. Technol. 14 670
|
[16] |
Sands B L, Ganguly B N and Tachibana K 2008 Appl. Phys. Lett. 92 151503
|
[17] |
Fang Z, Qiu Y and Luo Y 2003 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 36 2980
|
[18] |
Kuwahara T, Kuroki T, Yoshida K, Saeki N and Okubo M 2012 Thin Solid Films 523 2
|
[19] |
Walsh J L, Iza F, Janson N B, Law V J and Kong M G 2010 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 43 075201
|
[20] |
Chen L W, Wei Y, Zuo X, Cong J and Meng Y D 2012 Thin Solid Films 521 226
|
[21] |
Ren Y, Wang C X and Qiu Y P 2008 Surf. Coat. Technol. 202 2670
|
[22] |
Cheng C, Liye Z and Zhan R J 2006Surf. Coat. Technol. 200 6659
|
[23] |
Peng S J, Liu X L, Sun J, Gao Z Q, Yao L and Qiu Y P 2010 Appl. Surf. Sci. 256 4103
|
[24] |
Vogelsang A, Ohl A, Foest R, Schröder K and Weltmann K D 2011 Plasma Process. Polym. 8 77
|
[25] |
Carton O, Salem D B, Bhatt S, Pulpytel J and Khonsari F A 2012 Plasma Process. Polym. 9 984
|
[26] |
Chaiwong C, Tunma S, Sangprasert W, Nimmanpipug P and Boonyawan D 2012 Surf. Coat. Technol. 204 2991
|
[27] |
Okubo M, Tahara M, Saeki N and Yamamoto T 2008 Thin Solid Films 516 6592
|
[28] |
Zheng X, Chen G L, Zhang Z X, Beem J, Massey S and Huang J F 2013 Surf. Coat. Technol. 226 123
|
[29] |
Chen G L, Zhou M Y, Zhang Z X, Lv G H, Massey S, Smith W and Tatoulian M 2011 Plasma Process. Polym. 8 701
|
[30] |
Nasef M M and Hegazy E A 2004 Prog. Polym. Sci. 29 499
|
[31] |
Chen G L, Chen S H, Chen W X and Yang S Z 2008 Surf. Coat. Technol. 202 4741
|
[32] |
Goossens O, Dekempeneer E, Vangeneugden D, van de Leest R and Leys C 2001 Surf. Coat. Technol. 142-144 474
|
[33] |
Léveillé V and Coulombe S 2005 Plasma Source Sci. Technol. 14 467
|
[34] |
Zheng X, Chen G L, Zhang Z X, Lv G H, Beem J, Massey S and Tatoulian M 2013 Plasma Process. Polym. 10 379
|
[35] |
Navaneetha Pandiyaraj K, Selvarajan V, Deshmukh R R and Gao C Y 2009 Appl. Surf. Sci. 255 3965
|
[36] |
Schneider S, Lackmann J W, Narberhaus F, Bandow J E, Denis B and Benedikt J 2011 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 44 295201
|
[37] |
Liu H J, Pei Y N, Xie D, Deng X R, Leng Y X, Jin Y and Huang N 2010 Appl. Surf. Sci. 256 3941
|
[38] |
Cruz-Barba L E, Manolache S and Denes F 2002 Langmuir 18 9393
|
[39] |
Zhao B, Zhang L, Wang X Y and Yang J H 2012 Carbon 20 2710
|
[40] |
Kim D K, Choi Y M, Jung C H, Kwon H J, Choi J H, Nho Y C, Suh D H, Ganesan R and Kim J B 2009 Polym. Adv. Technol. 20 173
|
[41] |
Zhang R Y, Pan X L, Jiang M W, Peng S J and Qiu Y P 2012 Appl. Surf. Sci. 261 147
|
[42] |
Sarani A, Nikiforov A Y, Geyter N D, Morent R and Leys C 2011 Appl. Surf. Sci. 257 8737
|
[43] |
Ferrero F 2003 Polym. Test. 22 571
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|