|
|
|
Erratum：Classical interpretations of relativistic precessions |
| Sankar Hajra |
| Indian Physical Society, 2A & 2B Raja S. C. Mullick Road, Calcutta-700 032, India |
|
|
|
|
Abstract We point out an error in Eq. (19) in our original paper [Chin. Phys. B 23 040402 (2014)] and present the correct equation.
|
Received: 30 March 2014
Accepted manuscript online:
|
|
PACS:
|
04.80.Cc
|
(Experimental tests of gravitational theories)
|
| |
03.50.De
|
(Classical electromagnetism, Maxwell equations)
|
| |
45.20.D-
|
(Newtonian mechanics)
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
Sankar Hajra
E-mail: sankarhajra@yahoo.com
|
Cite this article:
Sankar Hajra Erratum：Classical interpretations of relativistic precessions 2014 Chin. Phys. B 23 090401
|
| [1] |
Hajra Sankar 2014 Chin. Phys. B 23 040402
|
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|
