ELECTROMAGNETISM, OPTICS, ACOUSTICS, HEAT TRANSFER, CLASSICAL MECHANICS, AND FLUID DYNAMICS |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Lensless two-color ghost imaging from the perspective of coherent-mode representation |
Bin Luo(罗斌)1, Guohua Wu(吴国华)2, Longfei Yin(尹龙飞)2 |
1 State Key Laboratory of Information Photonics and Optical Communications, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China;
2 School of Electronic Engineering, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China |
|
|
Abstract The coherent-mode representation theory is firstly used to analyze lensless two-color ghost imaging. A quite complicated expression about the point-spread function (PSF) needs to be given to analyze which wavelength has a stronger affect on imaging quality when the usual integral representation theory is used to ghost imaging. Unlike this theory, the coherent-mode representation theory shows that imaging quality depends crucially on the distribution of the decomposition coefficients of the object imaged in a two-color ghost imaging. The analytical expression of the decomposition coefficients of the object is unconcerned with the wavelength of the light used in the reference arm, but has relevance with the wavelength in the object arm. In other words, imaging quality of two-color ghost imaging depends primarily on the wavelength of the light illuminating the object. Our simulation results also demonstrate this conclusion.
|
Received: 09 March 2018
Revised: 04 May 2018
Accepted manuscript online:
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61771067, 61631014, 61471051, and 61401036) and the Youth Research and Innovation Program of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, China (Grant Nos. 2015RC12 and 2017RC10). |
Corresponding Authors:
Bin Luo
E-mail: luobin@bupt.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Bin Luo(罗斌), Guohua Wu(吴国华), Longfei Yin(尹龙飞) Lensless two-color ghost imaging from the perspective of coherent-mode representation 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 094202
|
[1] |
Strekalov D V, Sergienko A V, Klyshko D N and Shih Y H 1995 Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 3600
|
[2] |
Pittman T B, Shih Y H, Strekalov D V and Sergienko A V 1995 Phys. Rev. A 52 R3429
|
[3] |
Barbosa G A 1996 Phys. Rev. A 54 4473
|
[4] |
Bennink R S, Bentley S J and Boyd R W 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 113601
|
[5] |
Gatti A, Brambilla E, Bache M and Lugiato L A 2004 Phys. Rev. A 70 013802
|
[6] |
Cheng J and Han S 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 093903
|
[7] |
Cao D Z, Xu B L, Zhang S H and Wang K G 2015 Chin. Phys. Lett. 32 114208
|
[8] |
Shapiro J H 2008 Phys. Rev. A 78 061802
|
[9] |
Erkmen B I 2012 J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 29 782
|
[10] |
Zhao C, Gong W, Chen M, Li E, Wang H, Xu W and Han S 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 101 141123
|
[11] |
Gong W and Han S 2015 Sci. Rep. 5 9280
|
[12] |
Zhao S M and Zhuang P 2014 Chin. Phys. B 23 054203
|
[13] |
Yu W, Li M, Yao X, Liu X, Wu L and Zhai G 2014 Opt. Express 22 7133
|
[14] |
Cheng J 2009 Opt. Express 17 7916
|
[15] |
Zhang P, Gong W, Shen X and Han S 2010 Phys. Rev. A 82 033817
|
[16] |
Hardy N D and Shapiro J H 2011 Phys. Rev. A 84 063824
|
[17] |
Gong W and Han S 2011 Opt. Lett. 36 394
|
[18] |
Tajahuerce E, Duran V, Clemente P, Irles E, Soldevila F, Andres P and Lancis J 2014 Opt. Express 22 16945
|
[19] |
Yang Z, Zhao L, Zhao X, Qin W and Li J 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 024202
|
[20] |
Bina M, Magatti D, Moltini M, Gatti A, Lugiato L A and Ferri F 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 083901
|
[21] |
Gao L, Liu X L, Zheng Z and Wang K 2014 J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 31 886
|
[22] |
Wang C, Zhang D, Bai Y and Chen B 2010 Phys. Rev. A 82 063814
|
[23] |
Nan S, Bai Y, Shi X, Shen Q, Li H, Qu L and Fu X 2017 IEEE Photonics J. 9 7500107
|
[24] |
Nan S, Bai Y, Shi X, Shen Q, Qu L, Li H and Fu X 2017 Photonics Res. 5 372
|
[25] |
Hardy N D and Shapiro J H 2013 Phys. Rev. A 87 023820
|
[26] |
Yu H, Li E, Gong W and Han S 2015 Opt. Express 23 14541
|
[27] |
Gong W, Zhao C, Yu H, Chen M, Xu W and Han S 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 26133
|
[28] |
Deng C, Pan L, Wang C, Gao X, Gong W and Han S 2017 Photonics Res. 5 431
|
[29] |
Chan K W C, O'Sullivan M N and Boyd R W 2009 Phys. Rev. A 79 033808
|
[30] |
Karmakar S and Shih Y 2010 Phys. Rev. A 81 033845
|
[31] |
Shi D, Fan C, Zhang P, Shen H, Zhang J, Qiao C and Wang Y 2013 Opt. Express 21 2050
|
[32] |
Zhang D J, Li H G, Zhao Q L, Wang S, Wang H B, Xiong J and Wang K 2015 Phys. Rev. A 92 013823
|
[33] |
Cheng J and Han S 2007 Phys. Rev. A 76 023824
|
[34] |
Shen Q, Bai Y, Shi X, Nan S, Qu L, Li L and Fu X 2018 Laser Phys. Lett. 15 035207
|
[35] |
Mandel L and Wolf E 1995 Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics (Cambridge University Press)
|
[36] |
Hu F, Wang X and Zhang J 2005 Infrared Technol. 2 008
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|