ELECTROMAGNETISM, OPTICS, ACOUSTICS, HEAT TRANSFER, CLASSICAL MECHANICS, AND FLUID DYNAMICS |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Theoretical analysis on deflagration-to-detonation transition |
Yun-Feng Liu(刘云峰)1,2, Huan Shen(沈欢)1,2, De-Liang Zhang(张德良)1,2, Zong-Lin Jiang(姜宗林)1,2 |
1 Institute of Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; 2 School of Engineering Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China |
|
|
Abstract The study on deflagration-to-detonation transition (DDT) is very important because this mechanism has relevance to safety issues in industries, where combustible premixed gases are in general use. However, the quantitative prediction of DDT is one of the major unsolved problems in combustion and detonation theory to date. In this paper, the DDT process is studied theoretically and the critical condition is given by a concise theoretical expression. The results show that a deflagration wave propagating with about 60% Chapman-Jouguet (CJ) detonation velocity is a critical condition. This velocity is the maximum propagating velocity of a deflagration wave and almost equal to the sound speed of combustion products. When this critical condition is reached, a CJ detonation is triggered immediately. This is the quantitative criteria of the DDT process.
|
Received: 26 December 2017
Revised: 29 March 2018
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
47.70.Pq
|
(Flames; combustion)
|
|
47.40.Rs
|
(Detonation waves)
|
|
82.33.Vx
|
(Reactions in flames, combustion, and explosions)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11672312 and 11532014). |
Corresponding Authors:
Yun-Feng Liu
E-mail: liuyunfeng@imech.ac.cn
|
Cite this article:
Yun-Feng Liu(刘云峰), Huan Shen(沈欢), De-Liang Zhang(张德良), Zong-Lin Jiang(姜宗林) Theoretical analysis on deflagration-to-detonation transition 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 084703
|
[1] |
Brinkley S R and Lewis B 1959 Seventh Symposium (International) on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, p. 807
|
[2] |
Oppenheim A K, Laderman A J and Urtiew P A 1962 Combustion Flame 6 193
|
[3] |
Oppenheim A K, Laderman A J and Urtiew P A 1963 Ninth Symposium (International) on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, p. 265
|
[4] |
Urtiew P and Oppenheim A K 1966 Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 295 13
|
[5] |
Lee J H S and Moen I O 1980 Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 6 359
|
[6] |
Shepherd J E and Lee J H S 1992 Major Research Topics in Combustion (New York: Springer) p. 439
|
[7] |
Zhao F, Tan H, Wu Q, et al. 2009 Physics 38 894 (in Chinese)
|
[8] |
Obara T, Kobayashi T and Ohyagi S 2012 Shock Waves 22 627
|
[9] |
Lin W, Zhou J, Fan X H, et al. 2015 Chin. Phys. B 24 014701
|
[10] |
Wang J, Duan J Y, Huang W, et al. 2011 Chin. J. High Press. Phys. 25 365 (in Chinese)
|
[11] |
Han X, Zhou J and Lin Z Y 2012 Chin. Phys. B 21 124702
|
[12] |
Goodwin G B, Houim R W and Oran E S 2017 Proc. Combustion Inst. 36 2717
|
[13] |
Valiev D, Bychkov V, Akkerman V, Law C K and Eriksson L E 2010 Combustion Flame 157 1012
|
[14] |
Kessler D A, Gamezo V N and Oran E S 2010 Combustion Flame 157 2063
|
[15] |
Heidari A and Wen J X 2014 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 39 6184
|
[16] |
Chao J, Otsuka T and Lee J H S 2005 Proc. Combustion Inst. 30 1889
|
[17] |
Lee J H S, Knystautas R and Yoshikawa N 1978 Acta Astronaut. 5 971
|
[18] |
Zhu Y J, Chao J and Lee J H S 2007 Proc. Combust. Inst. 31 2455
|
[19] |
Saif M, Wang W T, Pekalski A, Levin M and Radulescu M I 2017 Proc. Combustion Inst. 36 2771
|
[20] |
Kuznetsov M, Alekseev V, Mstsukov I and Dorofeev S 2005 Shock Waves 14 205
|
[21] |
Maeda S, Minami S, Okamoto D and Obara T 2016 Shock Waves 26 573
|
[22] |
Radulescu M I and Lee J H S 1967 Combustion Flame 11 353
|
[23] |
Wang C, Zhao Y Y and Zhang B 2016 J. Loss Prevention Process Industries 43 120
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|