| INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Influence of crystal dimension on performance of spherical crystal self-emission imager |
| Chenglong Zhang(张成龙)1,2, Yihang Zhang(张翌航)2, Haochen Gu(谷昊琛)2,3, Nuo Chen(陈诺)2,3, Xiaohui Yuan(远晓辉)4,5, Zhe Zhang(张喆)2,5,6,†, Miaohua Xu(徐妙华)7,‡, Yutong Li(李玉同)2,5,6, Yingjun Li(李英骏)1,§, and Jie Zhang(张杰)2,4,5 |
1 State Key Laboratory for Tunnel Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China;
2 Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;
3 School of Physical Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
4 Key Laboratory for Laser Plasmas (MoE) and School of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China;
5 Collaborative Innovation Center of IFSA (CICIFSA), Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China;
6 Songshan Lake Materials Laboratory, Dongguan 523808, China;
7 School of Science, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100089, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The spherical crystal imaging system, noted for its high energy spectral resolution (monochromaticity) and spatial resolution, is extensively applied in high energy density physics and inertial confinement fusion research. This system supports studies on fast electron transport, hydrodynamic instabilities, and implosion dynamics. The x-ray source, produced through laser-plasma interaction, emits a limited number of photons within short time scales, resulting in predominantly photon-starved images. Through ray-tracing simulations, we investigated the impact of varying crystal dimensions on the performance of a spherical crystal self-emission imager. We observed that increasing the crystal dimension leads to higher imaging efficiency but at the expense of monochromaticity, causing broader spectral acceptance and reduced spatial resolution. Furthermore, we presented a theoretical model to estimate the spatial resolution of the imaging system within a specific energy spectrum range, detailing the expressions for the effective size of the crystal. The spatial resolution derived from the model closely matches the numerical simulations.
|
Received: 09 September 2024
Revised: 20 September 2024
Accepted manuscript online: 09 October 2024
|
|
PACS:
|
52.57.-z
|
(Laser inertial confinement)
|
| |
52.57.Kk
|
(Fast ignition of compressed fusion fuels)
|
|
| Fund: Project supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant Nos. XDA25051000, XDA25010100, XDA25010300, XDA25030100, and XDA25030200). |
Corresponding Authors:
Zhe Zhang, Miaohua Xu, Yingjun Li
E-mail: zzhang@iphy.ac.cn;mhxu@cumtb.edu.cn;lyj@aphy.iphy.ac.cn
|
Cite this article:
Chenglong Zhang(张成龙), Yihang Zhang(张翌航), Haochen Gu(谷昊琛), Nuo Chen(陈诺), Xiaohui Yuan(远晓辉), Zhe Zhang(张喆), Miaohua Xu(徐妙华), Yutong Li(李玉同), Yingjun Li(李英骏), and Jie Zhang(张杰) Influence of crystal dimension on performance of spherical crystal self-emission imager 2024 Chin. Phys. B 33 125205
|
[1] Kozioziemski B, Bachmann B, Do A, et al. 2023 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 94 041102
[2] Belyaev L M, Gil’varg A B, Mikhalov Y A, et al. 1976 Sov. J. Quantum Electron. 6 1121
[3] Zhang C L, Zhang Y H, Yuan X H, et al. 2024 Chin. Phys. B 33 025201
[4] Harding E C, Robertson G K, Dunham G S, et al. 2023 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 94 083509
[5] Lindl J D 1994 AIP Conference Proceedings 318 635
[6] Kodama R, Norreys P A, Mima K, et al. 2001 Nature. 412 798
[7] Azechi H, Sakaiya T, Watari T, et al. 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 235002
[8] Betti R, Zhou C D, Anderson K S, et al. 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 155001
[9] Xu Z H, An H W and Wang J J 2024 Chin. Phys. Lett. 41 088201
[10] Wang Z L, Chen Z H, Gu Y, et al. 2023 Chin. Phys. B 32 038704
[11] Fujioka S, Fujiwara T, Tanabe M, et al. 2010 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 81 10
[12] Koch J A, Aglitskiy Y, Brown C, et al. 2003 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 74 2130
[13] Kawaguchi C F, Flippo K A, Rasmus A M, et al. 2021 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 92 093508
[14] TheobaldW, Solodov A A, Stoeckl C, et al. 2014 Nat. Commun. 5 5785
[15] Baton B, Koenig M, Fuchs J, et al. 2008 Phys. Plasmas 15 042706
[16] Jarrott L C, McGuffey C, Beg F N, et al. 2017 Phys. Plasmas 24 102710
[17] Jarrott L C, Wei M S, McGuffey C, et al. 2016 Nat. Phys. 12 499
[18] Ovchinnikov V M, Schumacher D W, McMahon M, et al. 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 065007
[19] Akli K U, Storm M J, McMahon M, et al. 2012 Phys. Rev. E. 86 26404
[20] Chawla S, Wei M S, Mishra R, et al. 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 025001
[21] SchollmeierMS, Geissel M, Shores J E, et al. 2015 Appl. Opt. 54 5147
[22] Sinars D B, Bennett G R, Wenger D F, et al. 2003 Appl. Opt. 42 4059
[23] Zhu J Q, Zhu J, Li X C, et al. 2018 High Power Laser Sci. Eng. 7 e12
[24] Zhang J, Wang W M, Yang X H, et al. 2020 Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 378 20200015
[25] Rebuffi L and Rio M S D 2017 Advances in Computational Methods for X-Ray Optics IV Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series
[26] Jiang C L, Xu J, Mu B Z, et al. 2021 Opt. Express 29 6133
[27] Li Y, Dong J J, Xie Q, et al. 2019 Opt. Express 27 8348
[28] Sakata S, Lee S, Morita H, et al. 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 3937 |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|
