CONDENSED MATTER: STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL, AND THERMAL PROPERTIES |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Dendritic tip selection during solidification of alloys: Insights from phase-field simulations |
Qingjie Zhang(张清杰)1, Hui Xing(邢辉)1,2,†, Lingjie Wang(王灵杰)1, and Wei Zhai(翟薇)1 |
1 School of Physical Science and Technology, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China; 2 Research & Development Institute of Northwestern Polytechnical University in Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518063, China |
|
|
Abstract The effect of undercooling $\Delta T$ and the interface energy anisotropy parameter $\varepsilon_{4} $ on the shape of the equiaxed dendritic tip has been investigated by using a quantitative phase-field model for solidification of binary alloys. It was found that the tip radius $\rho $ increases and the tip shape amplitude coefficient $A_{4} $ decreases with the increase of the fitting range for all cases. The dendrite tip shape selection parameter $\sigma^{\ast }$ decreases and then stabilizes with the increase of the fitting range, and $\sigma^{\ast }$ increases with the increase of $\varepsilon_{4} $. The relationship between $\sigma^{\ast }$ and $\varepsilon_{4}$ follows a power-law function $\sigma^{\ast }\propto \varepsilon_{4}^{\alpha } $, and $\alpha $ is independent of $\Delta T$ but dependent on the fitting range. Numerical results demonstrate that the predicted $\sigma^{\ast }$ is consistent with the curve of microscopic solvability theory (MST) for $\varepsilon_{4} <0.02$, and $\sigma ^{\ast }$ obtained from our phase-field simulations is sensitive to the undercooling when $\varepsilon_{4} $ is fixed.
|
Received: 15 March 2024
Revised: 20 May 2024
Accepted manuscript online: 13 June 2024
|
PACS:
|
61.50.Ah
|
(Theory of crystal structure, crystal symmetry; calculations and modeling)
|
|
81.10.Aj
|
(Theory and models of crystal growth; physics and chemistry of crystal growth, crystal morphology, and orientation)
|
|
02.70.-c
|
(Computational techniques; simulations)
|
|
61.72.-y
|
(Defects and impurities in crystals; microstructure)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2021YFB3502600) and Shenzhen Science and Technology Program (Grant No. JCYJ20220530161813029). |
Corresponding Authors:
Hui Xing
E-mail: huixing@nwpu.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Qingjie Zhang(张清杰), Hui Xing(邢辉), Lingjie Wang(王灵杰), and Wei Zhai(翟薇) Dendritic tip selection during solidification of alloys: Insights from phase-field simulations 2024 Chin. Phys. B 33 096103
|
[1] Zhao Y, Zhang B, Hou H, Chen W and Wang M 2019 J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 35 1044 [2] Neumann-Heyme H, Shevchenko N, Grenzer J, Eckert K, Beckermann C and Eckert S 2022 Phys. Rev. Mater. 6 063401 [3] Dantzig J A and Rappaz M 2016 Solidification 2nd Edn. (Lausanne: EPFL Press) p. 319 [4] Kurz W, Fisher D J and Trivedi R 2019 Int. Mater. Rev. 64 311 [5] Chopra M, Glicksman M and Singh N 1988 Metall. Trans. A 19 3087 [6] Li Q and Beckermann C 2002 J. Cryst. Growth 236 482 [7] Melendez A J and Beckermann C 2012 J. Cryst. Growth 340 175 [8] Liu S, Li J, Lee J and Trivedi R 2006 Philos. Mag. 86 3717 [9] Kurz W, Rappaz M and Trivedi R 2021 Int. Mater. Rev. 66 30 [10] Dougherty A and Lahiri M 2005 J. Cryst. Growth 274 233 [11] Zhao Y, Xing H, Zhang L, Huang H, Sun D, Dong X, Shen Y and Wang J 2023 Acta Metall. Sin. (Engl. Lett.) 36 1749 [12] Zhu J H, Zhen L, Zhong B Y, Wang Y J and Xu B X 2023 Chin. Phys. B 32 47701 [13] Zhu C S, Guo Z H, Lei P, Feng L and Zhao B R 2022 Chin. Phys. B 31 68102 [14] Shen X and Wang Q 2022 Chin. Phys. B 31 48201 [15] Li Y N, Hai M M, Zhao Y, Lv Y L, He Y, Chen G, Liu L Y, Liu R C and Zhang G G 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 128703 [16] Chen W P, Hou H, Zhang Y T, Liu W and Zhao Y H 2023 Chin. Phys. B 32 118103 [17] Chen L Q and Zhao Y 2022 Prog. Mater. Sci. 124 100868 [18] Zhao Y 2023 npj Comput. Mater. 9 94 [19] Karma A and Rappel W J 1998 Phys. Rev. E 57 4323 [20] Karma A and Lee Y H 2000 Phys. Rev. E 61 3996 [21] LaCombe J, Koss M, Fradkov V and Glicksman M 1995 Phys. Rev. E 52 2778 [22] Rosam J, Jimack P K and Mullis A M 2009 Phys. Rev. E 79 030601 [23] Mullis A M, Rosam J and Jimack P K 2009 Trans. Indian Inst. Met. 62 309 [24] Ramirez J C, Beckermann C, Karma A and Diepers H J 2004 Phys. Rev. E 69 051607 [25] Xing H, Dong X, Wang J and Jin K 2018 Metall. Mater. Trans. B 49 1547 [26] Duan P P, Xing H, Chen Z, Hao G H, Wang B H and Jin K X 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 060201 (in Chinese) |
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|