ELECTROMAGNETISM, OPTICS, ACOUSTICS, HEAT TRANSFER, CLASSICAL MECHANICS, AND FLUID DYNAMICS |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Finesse measurement for high-power optical enhancement cavity |
Xin-Yi Lu(陆心怡)1,2, Xing Liu(柳兴)1,2,†, Qi-Li Tian(田其立)1,2, Huan Wang(王焕)1,2, Jia-Jun Wang(汪嘉俊)1,2, and Li-Xin Yan(颜立新)1,2,‡ |
1 Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China; 2 Key Laboratory of Particle & Radiation Imaging(Tsinghua University), Ministry of Education, Beijing 100084, China |
|
|
Abstract Finesse is a critical parameter for describing the characteristics of an optical enhancement cavity (OEC). This paper first presents a review of finesse measurement techniques, including a comparative analysis of the advantages, disadvantages, and potential limitations of several main methods from both theoretical and practical perspectives. A variant of the existing method called the free spectral range (FSR) modulation method is proposed and compared with three other finesse measurement methods, i.e., the fast-switching cavity ring-down (CRD) method, the rapidly swept-frequency (SF) CRD method, and the ringing effect method. A high-power OEC platform with a high finesse of approximately 16000 is built and measured with the four methods. The performance of these methods is compared, and the results show that the FSR modulation method and the fast-switching CRD method are more suitable and accurate than the other two methods for high-finesse OEC measurements. The CRD method and the ringing effect method can be implemented in open loop using simple equipment and are easy to perform. Additionally, recommendations for selecting finesse measurement methods under different conditions are proposed, which benefit the development of OEC and its applications.
|
Received: 02 March 2023
Revised: 23 May 2023
Accepted manuscript online: 25 May 2023
|
PACS:
|
42.60.Da
|
(Resonators, cavities, amplifiers, arrays, and rings)
|
|
42.60.-v
|
(Laser optical systems: design and operation)
|
|
42.60.Fc
|
(Modulation, tuning, and mode locking)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2022YFA1603403). |
Corresponding Authors:
Xing Liu, Li-Xin Yan
E-mail: xingliu@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn;yanlx@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Xin-Yi Lu(陆心怡), Xing Liu(柳兴), Qi-Li Tian(田其立), Huan Wang(王焕), Jia-Jun Wang(汪嘉俊), and Li-Xin Yan(颜立新) Finesse measurement for high-power optical enhancement cavity 2024 Chin. Phys. B 33 014205
|
[1] Porat G, Heyl C M, Schoun S B, Benko C, Dorre N, Corwin K L and Ye J 2018 Nat. Photonics 12 387 [2] Zhang J, Hua L Q, Yu S G, Chen Z and Liu X J 2014 Chin. Phys. B 23 050502 [3] Pupeza I, Zhang C, Hogner M and Ye J 2021 Nat. Photonics 15 175 [4] Zhou Y, Zhao G, Liu J L, Yan X, Li Z, Ma W and Jia S 2014 Rev. Mod. Phys. 86 1391 [6] Yang P F, He H, Wang Z H, Han X, Li G, Zhang P F and Zhang T C 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 043701 [7] Huang Z and Ruth R D 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 976 [8] Zomer F, Fedala Y, Pavloff N, Soskov V and Variola A 2009 Appl. Opt. 48 6651 [9] Dupraz K, Alkadi M, Alves M, et al. 2020 Phys. Open 5 100051 [10] Aasi J, Abbott B P, Abbott R, et al. 2015 Class. Quantum Gravity 32 074001 [11] Deng X, Chao A, Feikes J, Hoehl A, Huang W, Klein R, Kruschinski A, Li J, Matveenko A, Petenev Y, Ries M, Tang C and Yan L 2021 Nature 590 576 [12] Liu X, Lu X, Wang H, Yan L, Li R, Huang W, Tang C, Chiche R and Zomer F 2023 Chin. Phys. B 32 034206 [13] Richard J P and Hamilton J J 1991 Appl. Opt. 30 3560 [14] Uehara N and Ueda K 1995 Appl. Phys. B Laser Opt. 61 9 [15] Lawrence M J, Willke B, Husman M E, Gustafson E K and Byer R L 1999 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 16 523 [16] Locke C R, Stuart D, Ivanov E N and Luiten A N 2009 Opt. Express 17 21935 [17] Kuntz K B, Wheatley T A, Song H, Webb J G, Mabrok M A, Huntington E H and Yonezawa H 2017 Opt. Express 25 573 [18] Morville J, Romanini D, Chenevier M and Kachanov A 2002 Appl. Opt 41 6980 [19] O'Keefe A and Deacon D A G 1988 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 59 2544 [20] Rempe G, Thompson R J, Kimble H J and Lalezari R 1992 Opt. Lett. 17 3 [21] Orr B J and He Y 2011 Chem. Phys. Lett. 512 1 [22] Poirson J, Bretenaker F, Vallet M and Floch A L 1997 JOSA B 14 2811 [23] Tan S, Berceau P, Saraf S and Lipa J A 2017 Opt. Express 25 7645 [24] He Y, Lu D and Zhao L 2019 Opt. Express 27 17876 [25] Galzerano G, Suerra E, Giannotti D, Canella F, Vicentini E and Cialdi S 2020 IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 69 9119 [26] Suter M and Dietiker P 2014 Appl. Opt. 53 7004 [27] Ismail N, Kores C C, Geskus D and Pollnau M 2016 Opt. Express 24 16366 [28] Leeuwen N J van, Diettrich J C and Wilson A C 2003 Appl. Opt. 42 3670 [29] An K, Yang C, Dasari R R and Feld M S 1995 Opt. Lett. 20 1068 [30] He Y and Orr B J 2000 Chem. Phys. Lett. 319 131 [31] Matone L, Barsuglia M, Bondu F, Cavalier F, Heitmann H and Man N 2000 Phys. Lett. A 271 314 [32] Drever R W P, Hall J L, Kowalski F V, Hough J, Ford G M, Munley A J and Ward H 2022 Appl. Phys. B 31 97 [33] Paldus B A, Harb C C, Spence T G, Wilke B, Xie J, Harris J S and Zare R N 1998 J. Appl. Phys. 83 3991 [34] Huang H and Lehmann K K 2011 J. Phys. Chem. A 115 9411 |
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|