中国物理B ›› 2017, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (6): 65205-065205.doi: 10.1088/1674-1056/26/6/065205

• PHYSICS OF GASES, PLASMAS, AND ELECTRIC DISCHARGES • 上一篇    下一篇

Comparison benchmark between tokamak simulation code and TokSys for Chinese Fusion Engineering Test Reactor vertical displacement control design

Qing-Lai Qiu(仇庆来), Bing-Jia Xiao(肖炳甲), Yong Guo(郭勇), Lei Liu(刘磊), Yue-Hang Wang(汪悦航)   

  1. 1 Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences(CAS), Hefei 230031, China;
    2 School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China;
    3 CAS Key Laboratory of Basic Plasma Physics and Department of Modern Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China
  • 收稿日期:2016-12-21 修回日期:2017-03-01 出版日期:2017-06-05 发布日期:2017-06-05
  • 通讯作者: Yong Guo E-mail:yguo@ipp.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:
    Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11305216, 11305209, and 11375191), the National Magnetic Confinement Fusion Research Program of China (Grant Nos. 2014GB103000 and 2014GB110003), and External Cooperation Program of BIC, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. GJHZ201303).

Comparison benchmark between tokamak simulation code and TokSys for Chinese Fusion Engineering Test Reactor vertical displacement control design

Qing-Lai Qiu(仇庆来)1, Bing-Jia Xiao(肖炳甲)1,2, Yong Guo(郭勇)1, Lei Liu(刘磊)1, Yue-Hang Wang(汪悦航)3   

  1. 1 Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences(CAS), Hefei 230031, China;
    2 School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China;
    3 CAS Key Laboratory of Basic Plasma Physics and Department of Modern Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China
  • Received:2016-12-21 Revised:2017-03-01 Online:2017-06-05 Published:2017-06-05
  • Contact: Yong Guo E-mail:yguo@ipp.ac.cn
  • Supported by:
    Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11305216, 11305209, and 11375191), the National Magnetic Confinement Fusion Research Program of China (Grant Nos. 2014GB103000 and 2014GB110003), and External Cooperation Program of BIC, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. GJHZ201303).

摘要: Vertical displacement event (VDE) is a big challenge to the existing tokamak equipment and that being designed. As a Chinese next-step tokamak, the Chinese Fusion Engineering Test Reactor (CFETR) has to pay attention to the VDE study with full-fledged numerical codes during its conceptual design. The tokamak simulation code (TSC) is a free boundary time-dependent axisymmetric tokamak simulation code developed in PPPL, which advances the MHD equations describing the evolution of the plasma in a rectangular domain. The electromagnetic interactions between the surrounding conductor circuits and the plasma are solved self-consistently. The TokSys code is a generic modeling and simulation environment developed in GA. Its RZIP model treats the plasma as a fixed spatial distribution of currents which couple with the surrounding conductors through circuit equations. Both codes have been individually used for the VDE study on many tokamak devices, such as JT-60U, EAST, NSTX, DIII-D, and ITER. Considering the model differences, benchmark work is needed to answer whether they reproduce each other's results correctly. In this paper, the TSC and TokSys codes are used for analyzing the CFETR vertical instability passive and active controls design simultaneously. It is shown that with the same inputs, the results from these two codes conform with each other.

关键词: code benchmark, TSC, TokSys, vertical displacement event, CFETR

Abstract: Vertical displacement event (VDE) is a big challenge to the existing tokamak equipment and that being designed. As a Chinese next-step tokamak, the Chinese Fusion Engineering Test Reactor (CFETR) has to pay attention to the VDE study with full-fledged numerical codes during its conceptual design. The tokamak simulation code (TSC) is a free boundary time-dependent axisymmetric tokamak simulation code developed in PPPL, which advances the MHD equations describing the evolution of the plasma in a rectangular domain. The electromagnetic interactions between the surrounding conductor circuits and the plasma are solved self-consistently. The TokSys code is a generic modeling and simulation environment developed in GA. Its RZIP model treats the plasma as a fixed spatial distribution of currents which couple with the surrounding conductors through circuit equations. Both codes have been individually used for the VDE study on many tokamak devices, such as JT-60U, EAST, NSTX, DIII-D, and ITER. Considering the model differences, benchmark work is needed to answer whether they reproduce each other's results correctly. In this paper, the TSC and TokSys codes are used for analyzing the CFETR vertical instability passive and active controls design simultaneously. It is shown that with the same inputs, the results from these two codes conform with each other.

Key words: code benchmark, TSC, TokSys, vertical displacement event, CFETR

中图分类号:  (Tokamaks, spherical tokamaks)

  • 52.55.Fa
52.35.Py (Macroinstabilities (hydromagnetic, e.g., kink, fire-hose, mirror, ballooning, tearing, trapped-particle, flute, Rayleigh-Taylor, etc.)) 52.65.-y (Plasma simulation)