Nanoscale control of low-dimensional spin structures in manganites
Wang Jing1, Ahmed Malik Iftikhar1, Liang Renrong2, Huang Wen3, Zheng Renkui4, Zhang Jinxing1, †,
Department of Physics, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
Tsinghua National Laboratory for Information Science and Technology, Institute of Microelectronics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
School of Microelectronics and Solid-State Electronics, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China
State Key Laboratory of High Performance Ceramics and Superfine Microstructure, Shanghai Institute of Ceramics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200050, China

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: jxzhang@bnu.edu.cn

Project supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (Grant No. 2014CB920902), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61306105 and 51572278), the Information Science and Technology (TNList) Cross-discipline Foundation from Tsinghua National Laboratory, China and the Fund from the State Key Laboratory of Electronic Thin Films and Integrated Devices, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610054, China.

Abstract
Abstract

Due to the upcoming demands of next-generation electronic/magnetoelectronic devices with low-energy consumption, emerging correlated materials (such as superconductors, topological insulators and manganites) are one of the highly promising candidates for the applications. For the past decades, manganites have attracted great interest due to the colossal magnetoresistance effect, charge-spin-orbital ordering, and electronic phase separation. However, the incapable of deterministic control of those emerging low-dimensional spin structures at ambient condition restrict their possible applications. Therefore, the understanding and control of the dynamic behaviors of spin order parameters at nanoscale in manganites under external stimuli with low energy consumption, especially at room temperature is highly desired. In this review, we collected recent major progresses of nanoscale control of spin structures in manganites at low dimension, especially focusing on the control of their phase boundaries, domain walls as well as the topological spin structures (e.g., skyrmions). In addition, capacitor-based prototype spintronic devices are proposed by taking advantage of the above control methods in manganites. This capacitor-based structure may provide a new platform for the design of future spintronic devices with low-energy consumption.

PACS: 75.75.–c;85.70.–w;85.75.–d
1. Introduction

For the last few decades, transition metal oxide materials have attracted intensive research interest due to the novel physical properties and the potential applications in next-generation electronic/magnetoelectronic devices. Very recently, there emerges a variety of novel quantum materials such as high-temperature superconductors,[1] topological insulators,[2] and multiferroics[3] whose spin, charge, orbital, and lattice degrees of freedom strongly interact with one another. Among these materials systems, peroverskite LaMnO3 with chemical doping, generally defined as “manganites”, have attracted intensive attention because they exhibit a variety of interesting phenomena, including metallic ferromagnetic (FM), orbital- (OO) and charge-ordered (CO) antiferromagnetic (AFM), and complex electronic phase separation and spin-glass states,[4] etc. In manganites, the A sites are usually occupied by trivalent rare-earth elements (e.g., La, Pr, Nd, etc.) and alkaline-earth elements such as Ca, Sr, Ba. To maintain the charge balance, a portion of Mn3+ ions were oxidized to Mn4+ions, resulting in the coexistence of mixed valance state of the manganese ions. Due to the variant Mn3+/Mn4+ ratio, manganites show multiple electrical and magnetic phase transitions as a function of temperature,[5] such as metal–insulator, order–disorder, FM–AFM transitions), which are very sensitive to external stimuli (e.g., pressure, magnetic or electric fields[6]).

The discovery of colossal magnetoresistance (CMR) effect[7] (a distinct change of resistivity under the application of external magnetic fields) usually results from the magnetic-field-induced insulator-to-metal[69] and/or structural phase transitions.[10] Up to now, the fundamental microscopic origin of CMR effect is still under debate, the role of the double-exchange (DE) interaction, FM/AFM super-exchange interaction, charge/orbital ordering instabilities as well as their strong coupling with lattice deformation are not well understood.[1114] In addition, the CMR effect can only exist at extreme conditions (low temperature, high magnetic field), which are technically impractical and thus restrict the possible applications. Furthermore, the modulation of CMR effect by chemical doping[15] could not achieved reversibly. Therefore, it gives people a push to find a way of the deterministic control of order parameters in manganites at nanoscale, especially at ambient conditions.

Very recently, manganites with unique magnetic domain patterns and topological spin configurations[1619] attract people’s interest. In this review, we introduce the recent work about nanoscale control of spin structures at phase boundaries, domain walls with novel topological spin configurations including skyrmions in manganites using microscopy techniques. Through a full understanding of the dynamics of the low-dimensional spin structures, a capacitor-based spintronic device is proposed, in which writing and reading processes are correlated to the dynamics of phase boundaries, domain walls, and skyrmions in manganites, respectively. We hope this concept would provide a new platform in the development of new-generation spintronic devices with lower power consumption.

2. Nanoscale observation of the evolution of phase boundaries in manganites

In 1950, the existence of ferromagnetism driven by DE interaction in manganites was discovered by Jonker and Van Santen.[20,21] Afterwards,Wollan and Koehler reported the coexistence of FM and AFM phases in La1−xCaxMnO3 using neutron scattering technique.[22] In 1994, Jin et al. discovered a huge negative magnetoresistance (MR) effect around 77 K in epitaxial La0.67Ca0.33MnOx thin films, exhibiting a high MR value of 1.27 × 105% under the application of 6-T magnetic field (Fig. 1(a)), which was termed as CMR effect.[7] Afterwards, manganites have attracted a great deal of scientific and technological interest[46,815] due to the novel physical properties and potential applications in magnetic recordings.

Fig. 1. CMR effect and phase separation in La0.67Ca0.33MnOx and La0.73Ca0.27MnO3 epitaxial thin films. (a) A resistivity (ρ) versus magnetic field (H) curve obtained from La0.67Ca0.33MnOx epitaxial thin films grown on LaAlO3 substrate at 77 K and the MR ratio reaches to 1.27 × 105%. (b) STS images of the local electronic structure of (La, Ca)MnO3 thin film taken just below Tc in magnetic fields of 0, 0.3, 1, 3, 5, and 9 T (from left to right and top to bottom). Parts of the surface are insulating (light colors), whereas others are metallic (dark colors) or in an intermediate state. The color represents the local differential conductance at a fixed bias of 3 V. Scale bar, 100 nm. (a)Reprinted with permission from Ref. [7]. Copyright 1994, The American Association for the Advancement of Science. (b) Reprinted with permission from Ref. [28]. Copyright 1999, The American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Nevertheless, the underlying microscopic mechanism for CMR effect is not fully understood. The double-exchange interaction,[11,21,23,24] electron–phonon coupling,[21] and electronic phase separation[14,25] play partial roles on the CMR effects. Furthermore, the ground states of manganites tend to be intrinsically inhomogeneous due to the presence of strong phase separation, typically involving FM metallic and AFM CO/OO insulating phases.[14] Based on the intrinsic phase-separation properties of manganites, the formation of percolative paths for manganese eg electrons through FM regions was proposed by Uehara et al.,[26] who demonstrated that the (La,Pr,Ca)MnO3 system electronically phase separated into a sub-micrometer-scale mixture of FM metallic and CO insulating regions and percolative transport through FM domains depends sensitively on relative spin orientation of adjacent FM domains, which can be controlled by applied magnetic fields. In the following years, researchers demonstrated phase separation and percolative transport in manganites by transport and microscopy measurements[2733] with a spatial resolution. These results shed new light on the microscopic origin and the nanoscale control of the CMR effect in manganites.

In 1999, Fäth et al. firstly presented real-space images of the mixed phases of La0.7Ca0.3MnO3 thin films across a metal–insulator transition (MIT) using scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) and scanning tunneling spectroscopy (STS). Local electronic properties were spatial inhomogeneous on a sub-micrometer scale in La0.7Ca0.3MnO3 thin film (Fig. 1(b)), which demonstrates the coexistence of metallic and insulating phases. The application of magnetic field favors a considerable fraction of metallic phase from the original insulating regions, resulting in metallic percolation paths throughout the sample, as shown in Fig. 1(b). This observation demonstrates that the material shows mostly insulating behavior above the bulk Tc. Below Tc, the phase separation can be observed where inhomogeneous structures of metallic and insulating areas coexist. The size and structure are strongly dependent on the magnetic field. Additionally, insulating areas are found to maintain below Tc. These results suggest that the percolation of metallic FM domains indeed plays a significant role to MIT and the associated MR behavior.[28]

Although extensive theoretical and experimental studies have shown that the percolative connection of FM regions is the essential mechanism that gives rise to the CMR effect,[2633] it is still unclear how FM phase prevails under the strong competition with CO phase, e.g., how phase boundaries evolve under application of magnetic field. In 2009, Y. Murakami et al. demonstrated magnetic-field-induced nucleation and growth of an ordered FM phase in the La0.25Pr0.375Ca0.375MnO3 thin films by directly observing the dynamics of phase boundaries and flux distributions using cryogenic Lorentz microscopy and electron holography. The boundary between FM and CO phases and the coalescence of FM domains were independent on the mother phase in zero-field-cooling process (Fig. 2). Their observations demonstrate that a high localized magnetic field assists the motion of phase boundaries and the coalescence of adjacent FM domains. The results indicate the close relationship between the CMR effect and the magnetic microstructure of the mixed-phase state which is highly sensitive to magnetic fields. The enhancement of leakage fields may be due to the narrow space between neighbouring FM regions having irregular phase boundaries. These results provide new insights into the evolution dynamics of phase boundaries and complex domain structures at the nanoscale, and help to explain anomalous phase separation phenomena that are relevant for the CMR effect.[32] Furthermore, the direct observation of the percolation of metallic FM and the phase boundary motion provide more degree of freedom to design high-density spintronic devices.

Fig. 2. Microscopic observation of phase boundaries and the coalescence of FM domains using cryogenic Lorentz microscope and electron holography. Lorentz microscope images of multiple domains and a single domain formed in ZFC (a) and FC (c). (b), (d) The corresponding schematics of the boundary structures in panels (a) and (c). The red lines in panels (b) and (d) depict the phase boundaries, and the black and white lines in panel (b) represent the magnetic domain walls within multiple FM domains. The red arrows in panels (b) and (d) indicate the magnetization vectors determined by the holographic analysis. The black arrow in panel (c) represents the direction of the applied magnetic field H in the FC measurement. The Lorentz microscope images were taken in the under-focus condition. (e) Electron diffraction pattern observed in the mother phase at 87 K. The green arrows indicate superlattice reflections, which indicate the presence of the CO portions within the mother phase. (f)–(i) ZFC observations of the coalescence of FM domains distributed independently in the mother phase. Regions having blue lines are in the FM phase and those having sepia lines are in the mother phase. Contour lines and the red arrows represent the in-plane component and the direction of the magnetic flux, respectively. Domain connection occurs preferentially in areas (indicated by circles) where the leakage magnetic field is relatively strong. The phase information has been amplified by a factor of four. The red circles, green circles, and blue circles represent domain coalescence that was observed in cooling from 41.9 K to 40.3 K, from 40.3 K to 38.5 K, and from 38.5 K to 36.7 K, respectively. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [32]. Copyright 2009, Nature Publishing Group.
3. The spin polarized current-induced magnetic domain-wall (DW) motion

Spin-polarized-current-induced magnetic DW motion in transition metal nanowires has attracted great research interest because of the nontrivial physical properties[3440] and the potential applications in memories/registers.[41,42] The intrinsic driving force for the DW motion is the spin transfer torque (STT). Nevertheless, the obstacle that prevents the real application of the DW motion is the serious heating effect induced by the high threshold current density. In order to meet the requirement of low energy consumption in spintronic devices,[4245] researchers have tried to explore multiple ways to reduce the threshold current density such as novel geometries[46] and techniques.[4749] In 2011, Chanthbouala et al. reported higher efficiencies of intrinsic torques on domain walls by taking advantage of the geometry of vertical-current injection as compared with that of planar-current injection. The out-of-plane (‘field-like’) torque plays a major role on DW displacement in the case of vertical-current injection, which is consistent with theoretical calculations. The involved current densities are about 100 times smaller than that commonly observed with in-plane currents.[46] Later, Koyama et al. reported that the threshold current density for DW motion in a perpendicularly magnetized Co/Ni nanowire was determined by intrinsic pining, and thus the adiabatic spin torque dominates in DW motion. This conclusion was supported by the field-independent threshold current density and the presence of its minimum on tuning the wire width.[47]

Though people have attempted to explore the nontrivial physics and spin-torque efficiency, there is no dramatic breakthrough for the low threshold current density in transition metals, which is a significant ingredient to power consumption of future spintronic devices and registers based on DW motion. Therefore, one question arises: is there any possibility to achieve DW motion with lower current density in other magnetic materials? In recent years, several groups have studied current-driven magnetization switching and DW motion in transition metal oxides and semiconductors. Yamanouchi et al. demonstrated that magnetization reversal through DW switching in an FM semiconductor can be induced in the absence of a magnetic field using current pulses with densities below 109 A/m2.[50] Feigenson et al. reported magnetic DW motion in sub-micrometer patterns of FM SrRuO3 films with current density in the range of ∼ 109–1010 A/m2, which is ∼ 2–3 orders of magnitude smaller than the one in transition metals, indicating relatively high spin-torque efficiency in this oxide thin film.[51] However, the slow switching speed and low FM transition temperature limit the practical application of these materials.

Apart from the motion of nanoscale phase boundary and their role on the CMR effect, manganites may also be a good model system for the magnetic DW motion driven by low current density during the STT process. Compared with 3d transition metals, complex oxides such as La0.7Sr0.3MnO3[5254] inherently exhibit a high spin polarization P[55] and a low saturation magnetization Ms, which is promising for applications of current-driven DW motion, due to a spin-torque efficiency that scales as P/Ms.[56] In 2014, Foerster et al.[57] studied the interaction between spin-polarized current and magnetization on La2/3Sr1/3MnO3 (LSMO) nanowires with in-plane anisotropy using low temperature magneto-transport method. A magnetic domain wall was nucleated in the area between the electrical contacts of the ring structure indicated by higher resistance for angles between 10° and 25°, as shown in Fig. 3(a). Figure 3(b) shows the current-assisted depinning field for DW motion in LSMO half ring, and two different regimes are identified: symmetric (lower current densities, approximately 8 × 109 A/m2) and asymmetric (higher current densities, above approximately 8 × 109 A/m2) reduction of the depinning field for positive/negative current polarizations. The symmetric reduction for both current polarizations may result from the polarity-independent heating effect, but the asymmetric reduction in the depinning field is the signature of spin torque effect. The determined STT efficiency is in the order of 4 × 10−14 Tm2/A, which is 5–10 times larger than typical values of permalloy.[58]

Fig. 3. DW injections and depinning in LSMO half ring with in-plane anisotropy. (a) Resistance of LSMO half ring as a function of the angular of DW position. The increase of the resistance for directions between 10° and 25° (see inset) indicates a magnetic domain wall is positioned between the two inner contacts of the wire. (b) DW depinning fields in LSMO half ring as determined from the jump in the resistance signal. Data shown is averaged over six measurements in different experimental runs each, with error bars corresponding to one standard deviation. The lines correspond to different fits of high current density data (assuming either symmetric or asymmetric behavior). The insets show examples of two depinning field measurements for 5 V and 9 V pulses, showing also the increase in the resistance fluctuations. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [57]. Copyright 2014, AIP Publishing LLC.

Very recently, Wang et al. the reported probe-induced magnetic DW motion in LSMO thin films with perpendicular anisotropy, which was integrated in a manganite/dielectric/metal capacitor (Fig. 4(a)). In order to achieve a continuous spin displacement, an ultralow ac voltage of 0.1 Vpp was applied to the spin-polarized tip. Continuous magnetic DWs motion along the tip scanning direction was observed (Fig. 4(b)). STT occurs across the interface of the spin-polarized tip and the strongly correlated manganite thin film during the spin injection into capacitor, where a lower bound of estimated threshold current density is ∼ 108 A/m2 at the tip/oxide interface. This ac probe-voltage-controlled DW motion, at an ambient condition, demonstrates a critical framework for fundamental understanding of the manipulation of nanomagnet systems with low-energy consumption.[59]

Fig. 4. A probe-based ferromagnet/dielectric/metal capacitor for spin displacement and magnetic DW motion in FM layer after the application of scanning probe bias. (a) Contact geometry of vertical spin displacement between a downward-magnetized (red thick arrow) tip and a domain wall in aferromagnet/dielectric/metal capacitor. (b) The domain patterns before (top panel) and after the application of an AC voltage on a scanning tip once(intermediate) and twice (bottom panel) at the same area. The colored lines indicate the movement along the fast-scanning direction. Scale bar, 400 nm. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [59]. Copyright 2014, American Physical Society.
4. Nanoscale observation and manipulation of skyrmions

Skyrmion,[60] a vortex-like topological spin texture where the spins were predicted to be in all directions wrapping a sphere, is recently discovered in B20-type helimagnets[18,19,6165] as seen in their temperature/magnetic-field (T/B) phase diagram. In these systems, DM interaction naturally leads to a helical (HL) spin order, which turns into a triangular skyrmion crystal (SkX) under an external magnetic field[66,67] as observed in a narrow region of the BT phase diagram for bulk samples by neutron-scattering experiments.[62] One characteristic of B20-type helimagnets is that they lack space inversion symmetry, which is believed to be a key ingredient of magnetic skyrmions.[62,67,68] Enhanced stability of the SkX in two-dimensional (2D) systems or in thin-plate samples was predicted theoretically,[69] and indeed confirmed by Lorentz microscope experiments.[68,70,71] Skyrmion configuration in a magnetic solid is anticipated to produce unconventional spin-electronic phenomena such as topological Hall effects,[7274] multiferroic,[75] MR behaviors,[76] and current-driven motion with ultralow current density.[18,19,77,78] These properties can be understood from a unified viewpoint, namely, the emergent electromagnetism associated with the non-coplanar spin structure of skyrmions, which also indicates the potential applications of skyrmions as information carriers in magnetic storage and processing devices.[79]

Apart from the fascinating physical behaviors, magnetic skyrmions exhibit large potential in highly energy efficient spintronic device applications. It was found that a dc current as small as 105 A/m2 was capable to induce translational and rotational motion of skyrmions,[80,81] which is several orders of magnitude lower than the current density (∼ 1011–1012 A/m2) for controlling DW motion in the FM metals.[81,82] Theoretical simulations have indeed shown that, the flexibility of skyrmions allows them to be far less hindered by defects in comparison with the current-induced DW motion.[82,83] Therefore, skyrmion-based devices with such low-current controllability could be one of the central focuses for next-generation applications. However, the main obstacles are that skyrmions have been only observed at low temperatures/with magnetic field for a few exotic materials and the manipulation of individual skyrmions has not yet been achieved.

Very recently, Yu et al. reported the real-space observation of a biskyrmion, as defined by a molecular form of two bound skyrmions with the total topological charge of 2, realized under magnetic field applied normal to a thin plate of a bilayered manganite with centrosymmetric structure. They have observed a distorted-triangle lattice of biskyrmion crystal using a Lorentz transmission electron microscopy (TEM), which is composed of two bound skyrmions with oppositely swirling spins (magnetic helicities). Furthermore, they demonstrated that these biskyrmions could be electrically driven with several orders of magnitude lower current density (< 108 A/m2) than that for the conventional FM domain walls.[19] The detailed structure of the microdevice can be seen in Fig. 5(a)5(c). Images in magnetic configurations were recorded by in-situ Lorentz TEM observations while passing current across the device at 20 K. As the current passes through the device at zero magnetic field, no significant change occurs for the spontaneous stripes, ensuring that the current-induced joule heat would not increase the local temperature over its Tc. When a magnetic field of 0.3 T was applied to the device, the biskyrmions were nucleated in the thinner region of the device. The in-situ Lorentz TEM images (Fig. 5(d)5(g)) show that the biskyrmions appear to flow under the excitations of current above J = 7.0 × 107 A/m2, while the stripes remain unchanged. In contrast to the robust spontaneous (B = 0) stripes below current density of 2.52 × 108 A/m2, the stripes in the mixed state at B = 0.3 T become undiscerned as well as the biskyrmions upon the current excitation above 9.0 × 107 A/m2 (see Fig. 5(g)). Figures 5(h)5(k) clearly show that the electric current can trigger the dynamical transformation from stripes to biskyrmions in some critical region of external magnetic field and temperature, where the biskyrmions and stripes coexist due to their first-order transition nature. Figures 5(l)5(o) show the change of the biskyrmion lattice under the excitation of current. Finally, all of the biskyrmions flow away at the current density above 6.0 × 107 A/m2, which is lower than that for driving biskyrmions in case of their coexistence with stripes.[19]

Fig. 5. Observation of stripes and biskyrmions under current excitations in a microdevice based on a bilayered manganites La2−2xSr1+2xMn2O7 with x = 0.315. (a) Schematic of the microdevice. (b), (c) Scanning-ion-microscopy images of the plane and cross-section views of the microdevice. (d)–(o) Lorentz TEM images of stripes and biskyrmions obtained under current excitations. Changes in magnetic configurations with increasing current J (in unit of 107 A/m2), obtained under a magnetic field of 0.3 T applied normal to the (001)-plane device plate at 20 K. (d)–(g) A mixed state of screws and biskyrmions at J = 4.8 × 107 A/m2–9.0 × 107 A/m2. (h)–(k) A mixed state at finely tuned J (7.5 × 107 A/m2–7.8 × 107 A/m2) and (l)–(o) a single-phase biskyrmion lattice state at J = 2.0 × 107 A/m2–6.0 × 107 A/m2. Red arrows indicate the current direction. The insert at the right bottom corner shows the biskyrmion lattice without current excitation. Scale bars in panels (d), (h), and (l) correspond to 500 nm. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [19]. Copyright 2014, Nature Publishing Group.
5. Capacitor-based spintronic devices

According to the above discussion, Joule heat from high threshold current density during the STT process is one of the major sources of the energy consumption in spintronic devices. Based on the above controls of magnetic phase boundaries, DWs or topological spin structures such as skyrmions, manganites may be integrated with a capacitor-based structure so that the write-in and read-out process will not induce a large charge current across the whole devices. Wang et al. discovered that the estimated instantaneous threshold current density at the tip/film interface for DW motion is even ∼ 3–4 orders of magnitude lower than that in transition metals, and there is no direct current flows through the circuit.[59] This capacitor-based geometry provides us a new technique for nanoscale control of spin structures with ultralow energy consumption. Therefore, we propose a prototype concept of information storage unit (magnetic phase boundaries, DWs or topological spin structures such as skyrmions in manganites) integrated in a capacitor-based multilayer structure as shown in Fig. 6.

Fig. 6. Spintronic devices ingredient in capacitor-based multilayer structures. (a) Schematic diagram of writing process of the spintronic device. The writing process occurs with the changing of spin state in functional layer, which is correlated to the motions of phase boundaries, domain walls, and skyrmions driven by STT during charging and discharging processes in the capacitor. (b) Schematic diagram of reading process of the spintronic device. TMR of functional layer/tunneling barrier/reference layer is recorded to read ‘0’ (large TMR) and ‘1’ (small TMR) digital bits. (c) and (d) Schematics of multilayer structures ingredient in all kinds of spintronic devices based on the motion of phase boundaries (c), domain walls with in-plane (c), and out-of-plane (d) anisotropy, and skyrmions (d). FM layer is used to polarize electrons during writing process. Functional layer is composed of manganites thin film with different spin states. The magnetization of reference layer is determined by the bottom FE/AFM layer, which also serves as dielectric layer of the capacitor. The magnetic anisotropy of FM, reference, and FE/AFM layers could be either in-plane or out-of-plane, which is determined by spin states in manganites. In panel (c), the figure of domain wall with in-plane anisotropy reprinted with permission from Ref. [85]. Copyright 2014, IOP Publishing Ltd. In panel (d), the figure of skyrmion reprinted with permission from Ref. [18]. Copyright 2013, Nature Publishing Group.

The write-in process is correlated with the motions of the so-called functional layers (e.g. phase boundaries, domain walls, or skymions in manganites), which can be driven by STT when spin-polarized electrons go through the functional layer (with in-plane or out-of-plane anisotropy) during charging and discharging of the capacitor (Fig. 6(a)). In the read-out process, tunneling magnetoresistance (TMR) combined of functional layer/tunneling layer/reference layer can be recorded before and after the spin states has been reversibly controlled (Fig. 6(b)). In order to succeed in measuring the resistance change in this TMR structure, the reference layer could be pinned by an AFM or multiferroic component.[3,84] In this capacitor structure, there will be no direct current across the whole circuit, which will greatly reduce the heating effect and the corresponding energy consumption. Apart from the perovskite manganite system, it is possible to extend this functional layer of the capacitor-based prototype devices into different magnetic materials or structures such as FM metals, dilute magnetic semiconductors and emerging layered materials with topological states or strong spin-orbital coupling.

6. Conclusions

We reviewed the physical properties and dynamic controls of nanoscale spin structures (at phase boundaries, domain walls, as well as topological spin structures such as skyrmions) in manganites. Additionally, a new concept of spintronic device is proposed, which is based on the nanoscale modulation of those low-dimensional spin structures in manganites integrated in a capacitor-based spintronic devices. We hope this prototype concept could provide a new geometry for next-generation spintronic applications with low energy consumption.

Reference
1Shen Z XDessau D S 1995 Phys. Rep. 253 1
2Kargarian MFiete G A 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 156403
3Ramesh RSpaldin N A 2007 Nat. Mater. 6 21
4Salamon M BJaime M 2001 Rev. Mod. Phys. 73 583
5Ramirez A P 1997 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 9 8171
6Imada MFujimori ATokura Y 1998 Rev. Mod. Phys. 70 1039
7Jin STiefel T HMcCormack MFastnacht R ARamesh RChen L H 1994 Science 264 413
8Helmolt RWocker JHolzapfel BSchultz MSamwer K 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 2331
9Tokura YUrushibara AMoritomo YArima TAsamitsu AKido GFurukawa N 1994 J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 63 3931
10Asamitsu AMoritomo YTomioka YArima TTokura Y 1995 Nature 373 407
11Nagaev E L 2001 Phys. Rep. 346 387
12Tomioka YOkuda TOkimoto YAsamitsu AKuwahara HTokura Y 2001 J. Alloys Compd. 326 27
13Okuda TKimura TKuwahara HTomioka YAsamitsu AOkimoto YSaitoh ETokura Y 1999 Mat. Sci. Eng. 63 163
14Dagotto EHotta TMoreo A 2001 Phys. Rep. 344 1
15Tokura YTomioka Y 1999 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 200 1
16Bakaul S RLin WWu T 2011 Appl. Phys. Lett. 99 042503
17Nagai TYamada HKonoto MArima TKawasaki MKimoto KMatsui YTokura Y 2008 Phys. Rev. 78 180414
18Nagao MSo Y GYoshida HIsobe MHara TIshizuka KKimoto K 2013 Nat. Nanotechnol. 8 325
19Yu X ZTokunaga YKaneko YZhang W ZKimoto KMatsui YTaguchi YTokura Y 2014 Nat. Commun. 5 3198
20Van Santen J HJonker G H 1950 Physica 16 599
21Zener C 1951 Phys. Rev. 82 403
22Wollan E OKoehler W C 1955 Phys. Rev. 100 545
23Anderson P WHasegawa H1995Phys. Rev.100675
24de Gennes P G 1960 Phys. Rev. 118 141
25Moreo AYunoki SDagotto E 1999 Science 283 2034
26Uehara MMori SChen C HCheong S W 1999 Nature 399 560
27Mayr MMoreo AVergés J AArispe JFeiguin ADagotto E2000Phys. Rev. Lett.86135
28Fath MFreisem SMenovsky A ATomioka YAarts JMydosh J A 1999 Science 285 1540
29Zhang LIsrael CBiswas AGreene R Lde Lozanne A 2002 Science 298 805
30Asaka TAnan YNagai TTsutsumi SKuwahara HKimoto KTokura YMatsui Y 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 207203
31Murakami YYoo J HShindo DAtou TKikuchi M 2003 Nature 423 965
32Murakami YKasai HKim J JMamishin SShindo DMori STonomura A 2010 Nat. Nanotechnol. 5 37
33Lai KNakamura MKundhikanjana WKawasaki MTokura YKelly M AShen Z X 2010 Science 329 190
34Thomas LMoriya RRettner CParkin S S P 2010 Science 330 1810
35Kläui MJubert P-OAllenspach RBischof ABland J A CFaini GRüdiger UVaz C A FVila LVouille C 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 026601
36Kläui MVaz C A FBland J A CWernsdorfer WFaini GCambril EHeyderman L JNolting FRüdiger U 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 106601
37Yamaguchi AOno TNasu SMiyake KMibu KShinjo TPhys. Rev. Lett.92077205
38Hayashi MThomas LRettner CMoriya RParkin S S P 2006 Nat. Phys. 3 21
39Thomas LHayashi MJiang XMoriya RRettner CParkin S S P 2006 Nature 443 197
40Torrejon JMalinowski GPelloux MWeil RThiaville ACuriale JLacour DMontaigne FHehn M 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 106601
41Hayashi MThomas LMoriya RRettner CParkin S S P 2008 Science 320 209
42Parkin S S PHayashi MThomas L 2008 Science 320 190
43Allwood D AXiong GFaulkner C CAtkinson DPetit DCowburn R P 2005 Science 309 1688
44Fukami SSuzuki SNagahara KOhshima NOzaki YSaito SNebashi RSakimura NHonjo HMori KIgarashi CMiura SIshiwata NSugibayashi T2009Symposium on VLSI Technology. Digest Tech. Pap230
45Chiba DYamada GKoyama TUeda KTanigawa HFukami SSuzuki TOhshima NIshiwata NNakatani Y 2010 Appl. Phys. Exp. 3 073004
46Chanthbouala AMatsumoto RGrollier JCros VAnane AFert AKhvalkovskiy A VZvezdin K ANishimura KNagamine YMaehara HTsunekawa KFukushima AYuasa S 2011 Nat. Phys. 7 626
47Koyama TChiba DUeda KKondou KTanigawa HFukami SSuzuki TOhshima NIshiwata NNakatani YKobayashi KOno T 2011 Nat. Mater. 10 194
48Miron I MMoore TSzambolics HBuda-Prejbeanu L DAuffret SRodacq BPizzini SVogel JBonfim MSchuhl AGaudin G 2011 Nat. Mater. 10 419
49Emori SBauer UAhh S MMartinez EBeach G S D 2013 Nat. Mater. 12 611
50Yamanouchi MChiba DMatsukura FOhno H 2004 Nature 428 539
51Feigenson MReiner J WKlein L 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 247204
52Rhensius JVaz C A FBisig ASchweitzer SHeidler JKorner H SLocatelli ANino M AWeigand MMechin LGaucher FGoering EHeyderman L JKlaui M 2011 Appl. Phys. Lett. 99 062508
53Cibert JBobo J FLuders U 2005 C. R. Phys. 6 977
54Vaza C A FWanga H QAhna C HHenricha V EBaykarab M ZSchwendemannb T CPiletb NAlbersb B JSchwarzb U DZhangc L HZhuc YWangd JAltmane E I 2009 Surf. Sci. 603 291
55Park J HVescovo EKim H JKwon CRamesh RVenkatesan T 1998 Nature 392 794
56Thiaville ANakatani YMiltat JSuzuki Y 2005 Europhys. Lett. 69 990
57Foerster MPena LVaz C A FHeinen JFinizio SSchula TBisig AButtner FEisebitt SMechin LHuhn SMoshnyaga VKlaui M 2014 Appl. Phys. Lett. 104 072410
58Laufenberg MBührer WBedau DMelchy P EKläui MVila LFaini GVaz C A FBland J A CRüdiger U 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 046602
59Wang JXie L SWang C SZhang H ZShu LBai JChai Y SZhao XNie J CCao C BGu C ZXiong C MSun YShi JSalahuddin SXia KNan C WZhang J X 2014 Phys. Rev. 90 224407
60Skyrme T H R 1962 Nucl. Phys. 31 556
61Hsieh DXia YWray LQian DPal ADil J HOsterwalder JMeier FBihlmayer GBihlmayer GKane C LHor Y SCava R JHasan M Z 2009 Science 323 919
62Mühlbauer SBinz BJonietz FPfleiderer CRosch ANeubauer AGeorgii RBöni P 2009 Science 323 915
63Munzer WNeubauer AAdams TMuhlbauer SFranz CJonietz FGrorgil RBoni PPedersen BSchmidt MRosch APfleiderer C 2010 Phys. Rev. 81 041203
64Poelma J EHawker C J 2010 Nat. Nanotechnol. 5 243
65Bergmann KKubetzka APietzsch OWiesendanger R 2014 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 26 394002
66Bogdanov A NYablonskii D A1989Sov. Phys. JETP68101
67Rößlerl U KBogdanov A NPfleiderer C 2006 Nature 442 797
68Yu X ZOnnse YKanazawa NPark J HHan J HMatsui YNagaosa NTokura Y 2010 Nature 465 901
69Yi S DOnoda SNagaosa NHan J H 2009 Phys. Rev. 80 054416
70Yu X ZKanazawa NOnose YKimoto KZhang W ZIshiwata SMatsui YTokura Y 2011 Nat. Mater. 10 106
71Nagaosa NTokura Y 2013 Nat. Nanotechnol. 8 899
72Onose YTakeshita NTerakura CTakagi HTokura Y 2005 Phys. Rev. 72 224431
73Lee MKang WOnose YTokura YOng N P 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 186601
74Neubauer APfleiderer CBinz BRosch ARitz RNiklowitz P GBöni P 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 186602
75Seki SYu X ZIshiwata STokura Y 2012 Science 336 198
76Du HLiang DJin CKong LStolt M JNing WYang JXing YWang JChe RZang JJin SZhang YTian M 2015 Nat. Commun. 6 7637
77Woo S HLitzius KKrüger BIm M YCaretta LRichter KMann MKrone AReeve RWeigand MAgrawal PFischer PKläui MBeach G S D2015arXiv 1502
78Büttner FMoutafis CSchneider MKrüger BGünther C MGeilhufe JSchmising C KMohanty JPfau BSchaffert SBisig AFoerster MSchulz TVaz C A FFranken J HSwagten H J MKläui MEisebitt S 2015 Nat. Phys. 11 225
79Fert ACros VSampaio J 2013 Nat. Nanotechnol. 8 152
80Jonietz FMühlbauer SPfleiderer CNeubauer AMünzer WBauer AAdams TGeorgii RBöni PDuine R AEverschor KGarst MRosch A 2010 Science 330 1648
81Yu X ZKanazawa NZhang W ZNagai THara TKimoto KMatsui YOnose YTokura Y 2012 Nat. Commun. 3 988
82Iwasaki JMochizuki MNagaosa N 2013 Nat. Commun. 4 1463
83Sampaio JCros VRohart SThiaville AFert A 2013 Nat. Nanotechnol. 8 839
84Eerenstein WMathur N DScott J F 2006 Nature 442 759
85Finizio SFoerster MKrüger BVaz C A FMiyawaki TMawass M APeña LMéchin LHühn SMoshnyaga VBüttner FBisig ALe Guyader LMoussaoui S E IValencia SKronast FEisebitt SKläui M2014J. Phys.: Condens. Matter26456003