Observation of size-dependent boundary effects in non-Hermitian electric circuits

doi:10.1088/1674-1056/aca9c4

中国物理B ›› 2023, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (3): 38401-038401.doi: 10.1088/1674-1056/aca9c4

Observation of size-dependent boundary effects in non-Hermitian electric circuits

Luhong Su(苏鹭红)^1,2, Cui-Xian Guo(郭翠仙)^1,†, Yongliang Wang(王永良)³, Li Li(李力)^1,2, Xinhui Ruan(阮馨慧)^1,4, Yanjing Du(杜燕京)^1,5, Shu Chen(陈澍)^1,6,7, and Dongning Zheng(郑东宁)^1,6,8,‡

1 Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;
2 School of Physical Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
3 CAS Center for Excellence in Superconducting Electronics, Shanghai Institute of Microsystem and Information Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200050, China;
4 Department of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;
5 China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China;
6 CAS Center for Excellence in Topological Quantum Computation and School of Physical Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
7 The Yangtze River Delta Physics Research Center, Liyang 213300, China;
8 Songshan Lake Materials Laboratory, Dongguan 523808, China

收稿日期:2022-10-27 修回日期:2022-11-26 接受日期:2022-12-08 出版日期:2023-02-14 发布日期:2023-02-14
通讯作者: Cui-Xian Guo, Dongning Zheng E-mail:cxguo@iphy.ac.cn;dzheng@iphy.ac.cn
基金资助:
Project supported by the State Key Development Program for Basic Research of China (Grant No. 2017YFA0304300), the Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province, China (Grant No. 2020B0303030001), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. T2121001), and the Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. XDB28000000).

Observation of size-dependent boundary effects in non-Hermitian electric circuits

1 Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;
2 School of Physical Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
3 CAS Center for Excellence in Superconducting Electronics, Shanghai Institute of Microsystem and Information Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200050, China;
4 Department of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;
5 China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China;
6 CAS Center for Excellence in Topological Quantum Computation and School of Physical Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
7 The Yangtze River Delta Physics Research Center, Liyang 213300, China;
8 Songshan Lake Materials Laboratory, Dongguan 523808, China

Received:2022-10-27 Revised:2022-11-26 Accepted:2022-12-08 Online:2023-02-14 Published:2023-02-14
Contact: Cui-Xian Guo, Dongning Zheng E-mail:cxguo@iphy.ac.cn;dzheng@iphy.ac.cn
Supported by:
Project supported by the State Key Development Program for Basic Research of China (Grant No. 2017YFA0304300), the Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province, China (Grant No. 2020B0303030001), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. T2121001), and the Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. XDB28000000).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： The non-Hermitian systems with the non-Hermitian skin effect(NHSE) are very sensitive to the imposed boundary conditions and lattice sizes, which lead to size-dependent non-Hermitian skin effects. Here, we report the experimental observation of NHSE with different boundary conditions and different lattice sizes in the unidirectional hopping model based on a circuit platform. The circuit admittance spectra and corresponding eigenstates are very sensitive to the presence of the boundary. Meanwhile, our experimental results show how the lattice sizes and boundary terms together affect the strength of NHSE. Therefore, our electric circuit provides a good platform to observe size-dependent boundary effects in non-Hermitian systems.

关键词: non-Hermitian, size-dependent boundary effects, circuit

Abstract: The non-Hermitian systems with the non-Hermitian skin effect(NHSE) are very sensitive to the imposed boundary conditions and lattice sizes, which lead to size-dependent non-Hermitian skin effects. Here, we report the experimental observation of NHSE with different boundary conditions and different lattice sizes in the unidirectional hopping model based on a circuit platform. The circuit admittance spectra and corresponding eigenstates are very sensitive to the presence of the boundary. Meanwhile, our experimental results show how the lattice sizes and boundary terms together affect the strength of NHSE. Therefore, our electric circuit provides a good platform to observe size-dependent boundary effects in non-Hermitian systems.

Key words: non-Hermitian, size-dependent boundary effects, circuit

中图分类号: (Electronic circuits)

84.30.-r

03.65.Vf (Phases: geometric; dynamic or topological) 03.65.Fd (Algebraic methods) 03.65.Yz (Decoherence; open systems; quantum statistical methods)

Luhong Su(苏鹭红), Cui-Xian Guo(郭翠仙), Yongliang Wang(王永良), Li Li(李力), Xinhui Ruan(阮馨慧), Yanjing Du(杜燕京), Shu Chen(陈澍), and Dongning Zheng(郑东宁). Observation of size-dependent boundary effects in non-Hermitian electric circuits[J]. 中国物理B, 2023, 32(3): 38401-038401.

参考文献

[1] Yao S and Wang Z 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 086803
[2] Lee T E 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 133903
[3] Gong Z, Ashida Y, Kawabata K, et al. 2018 Phys. Rev. X 8 031079
[4] Longhi S 2019 Phys. Rev. Res. 1 023013
[5] Lee J, Ahn J, Zhou H, et al. 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 206404
[6] Song F, Yao S and Wang Z 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 246801
[7] Jiang H, Lang L J, Yang C, et al. 2019 Phys. Rev. B 100 054301
[8] Lee C and Thomale R 2019 Phys. Rev. B 99 201103
[9] Jin L and Song Z 2019 Phys. Rev. B 99 081103
[10] Yang Z, Zhang K, Fang C, et al. 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 226402
[11] Borgnia D S, Kruchkov A J and Slager R J 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 056802
[12] Yuce C 2020 Phys. Rev. A 102 032203
[13] Zhang K, Yang Z and Fang C 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 126402
[14] Okuma N, Kawabata K, Shiozaki K, et al. 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 086801
[15] Zhang X and Gong J 2020 Phys. Rev. B 101 045415
[16] Wu H and An J H 2020 Phys. Rev. B 102 041119
[17] Zhou L, Gu Y and Gong J 2021 Phys. Rev. B 103 L041404
[18] Yuce C 2021 Phys. Lett. A 408 127484
[19] Liu C H, Zhang K, Yang Z, et al. 2020 Phys. Rev. Res. 2 043167
[20] Li L, Lee C H, Mu S, et al. 2020 Nat. Commun 11 1
[21] Guo C X, Liu C H, Zhao X M, et al. 2021 Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 116801
[22] Li L, Lee C and Gong J 2021 Commun. Phys. 4 42
[23] Longhi S 2019 Ann. Phys. 531 1900054
[24] Li J, Harter A K, Liu J, et al. 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 855
[25] Wang S, Hou B, Lu W, et al. 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 832
[26] Wu Y, Liu W, Geng J, et al. 2019 Science 364 878
[27] Wang C, Sweeney W R, Stone A D, et al. 2021 Science 373 1261
[28] Naghiloo M, Abbasi M, Joglekar Y N and Murch K W 2019 Nat. Phys. 15 1232
[29] Zhu X, Wang H, Gupta S, et al. 2020 Phys. Rev. Res. 2 013280
[30] Sebastian W, Mark K T H, et al. 2020 Science 368 311
[31] Xiao L, Deng T S, Wang K, et al. 2020 Nature Phys. 16 1
[32] Qi L, Wang G L, Liu S, et al. 2020 Phys. Rev. Appl. 13 064016
[33] Li L, Lee C and Gong J 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 250402
[34] Ghatak A, Brandenbourger M, van Wezel J and Coulais C 2020 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117 29561
[35] Martin B, Xander L E L, et al. 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 4608
[36] Yakir H, Jason C, Soric A B K, et al. 2018 Nat. Electron. 1 178
[37] Liu S, Shao R, Ma S, et al. 2021 Research 2021
[38] Helbig T, Hofmann S I, et al. 2020 Nature Phys. 16 747
[39] Helbig T, Hofmann T, Lee C, et al. 2019 Phys. Rev. B 99 161114
[40] Hofmann T, Helbig T, Schindler F, et al. 2020 Phys. Rev. Res. 2 023265
[41] Ezawa M 2019 Phys. Rev. B 99 121411
[42] Zhang Z Q, Wu B L, Song J, et al. 2019 Phys. Rev. B 100 184202
[43] Albert V V, Glazman L I and Jiang L 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 173902
[44] Imhof S, Berger C, et al. 2018 Nat. Phys. 14 925
[45] Lu Y, Jia N, Su L, et al. 2019 Phys. Rev. B 99 020302
[46] Jia N, Owens C, Sommer A, et al. 2015 Phys. Rev. X 5 021031
[47] Wu F 2004 J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 37 6653
[48] Schindler J, Lin Z, Lee J M, et al. 2012 J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 45 444029
[49] Lang L J, Weng Y, Zhang Y, et al. 2021 Phys. Rev. B 103 014302
[50] Lee C H, Stefan I, Christian B, et al. 2018 Commun. Phys. 1

Observation of size-dependent boundary effects in non-Hermitian electric circuits

Observation of size-dependent boundary effects in non-Hermitian electric circuits

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	Ya-Jie Ma(马雅洁), Xue-Chen Gao(高雪晨), Shao-Xiong Wu(武少雄), and Chang-shui Yu(于长水). Quantum speed limit of a single atom in a squeezed optical cavity mode[J]. 中国物理B, 2023, 32(4): 40308-040308.
[2]	Xin-Ke Li(李新克), Yuan Zhou(周原), Guang-Hui Wang(王光辉), Dong-Yan Lv(吕东燕),Fazal Badshah, and Hai-Ming Huang(黄海铭). Generation of microwave photon perfect W states of three coupled superconducting resonators[J]. 中国物理B, 2023, 32(4): 40306-040306.
[3]	Ya Wang(王亚), Guoping Sun(孙国平), and Guodong Ren(任国栋). Diffusive field coupling-induced synchronization between neural circuits under energy balance[J]. 中国物理B, 2023, 32(4): 40504-040504.
[4]	Xin-Ping Dong(董新平), Zhi-Bo Feng(冯志波), Xiao-Jing Lu(路晓静), Ming Li(李明), and Zheng-Yin Zhao(赵正印). Fast population transfer with a superconducting qutrit via non-Hermitian shortcut to adiabaticity[J]. 中国物理B, 2023, 32(3): 34201-034201.
[5]	Junjie Wang(王俊杰), Fude Li(李福德), and Xuexi Yi(衣学喜). Hall conductance of a non-Hermitian two-band system with k-dependent decay rates[J]. 中国物理B, 2023, 32(2): 20305-020305.
[6]	Peng Xu(许鹏), Ran Zhang(张然), and Sheng-Mei Zhao(赵生妹). Realization of the iSWAP-like gate among the superconducting qutrits[J]. 中国物理B, 2023, 32(2): 20306-020306.
[7]	Tong Liu(刘通) and Shujie Cheng(成书杰). Mobility edges generated by the non-Hermitian flatband lattice[J]. 中国物理B, 2023, 32(2): 27102-027102.
[8]	Dan Wu(吴丹), Xiao Li(李骁), Liang-Liang Wang(王亮亮), Jia-Shun Zhang(张家顺), Wei Chen(陈巍), Yue Wang(王玥), Hong-Jie Wang(王红杰), Jian-Guang Li(李建光), Xiao-Jie Yin(尹小杰), Yuan-Da Wu(吴远大), Jun-Ming An(安俊明), and Ze-Guo Song(宋泽国). Temperature characterizations of silica asymmetric Mach-Zehnder interferometer chip for quantum key distribution[J]. 中国物理B, 2023, 32(1): 10305-010305.
[9]	Xinxin Zuo(左欣欣), Jiang Lu(陆江), Xiaoli Tian(田晓丽), Yun Bai(白云), Guodong Cheng(成国栋), Hong Chen(陈宏), Yidan Tang(汤益丹), Chengyue Yang(杨成樾), and Xinyu Liu(刘新宇). Improvement on short-circuit ability of SiC super-junction MOSFET with partially widened pillar structure[J]. 中国物理B, 2022, 31(9): 98502-098502.
[10]	Jianfei Chen(陈健菲), Chaohua Wu(吴超华), Jingtao Fan(樊景涛), and Gang Chen(陈刚). Characterization of topological phase of superlattices in superconducting circuits[J]. 中国物理B, 2022, 31(8): 88501-088501.
[11]	Xin Guan(关欣), Gang Chen(陈刚), Jing Pan(潘婧), and Zhi-Guo Gui(桂志国). Hard-core Hall tube in superconducting circuits[J]. 中国物理B, 2022, 31(8): 80302-080302.
[12]	Boxue Zhang(张博学), Qingya Li(李青铔), Xiao Zhang(张笑), and Ching Hua Lee(李庆华). Real non-Hermitian energy spectra without any symmetry[J]. 中国物理B, 2022, 31(7): 70308-070308.
[13]	Hou-Rong Zhou(周后荣), Kun-Jie Cheng(程昆杰), Jie Ren(任洁), Li-Xing You(尤立星),Li-Liang Ying(应利良), Xiao-Yan Yang(杨晓燕), Hao Li(李浩), and Zhen Wang(王镇). Photon number resolvability of multi-pixel superconducting nanowire single photon detectors using a single flux quantum circuit[J]. 中国物理B, 2022, 31(5): 57401-057401.
[14]	Hui Jiang and Ching Hua Lee. Filling up complex spectral regions through non-Hermitian disordered chains[J]. 中国物理B, 2022, 31(5): 50307-050307.
[15]	Shi-Yu Feng(冯识谕), Yong-Bo Su(苏永波), Peng Ding(丁芃), Jing-Tao Zhou(周静涛), Song-Ang Peng(彭松昂), Wu-Chang Ding(丁武昌), and Zhi Jin(金智). Extrinsic equivalent circuit modeling of InP HEMTs based on full-wave electromagnetic simulation[J]. 中国物理B, 2022, 31(4): 47303-047303.