Time-energy distribution of photoelectron from atomic states with different magnetic quantum numbers in elliptically polarized laser fields

doi:10.1088/1674-1056/ad58b3

中国物理B ›› 2024, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (9): 93301-093301.doi: 10.1088/1674-1056/ad58b3

Time-energy distribution of photoelectron from atomic states with different magnetic quantum numbers in elliptically polarized laser fields

Jingyang Xu(徐菁阳)¹, Li Guo(郭丽)^1,†, Xin Qi(齐昕)¹, Ronghua Lu(陆荣华)², Min Zhang(张敏)^1,‡, Jingtao Zhang(张敬涛)¹, and Jing Chen(陈京)^3,4,§

1 Department of Physics, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China;
2 Key Laboratory for Quantum Optics and Center for Cold Atom Physics, Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, China;
3 Hefei National Research Center for Physical Sciences at the Microscale and School of Physical Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China;
4 Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Ultraintense Laser and Advanced Material Technology, College of Engineering Physics, Shenzhen Technology University, Shenzhen 518118, China

收稿日期:2024-03-29 修回日期:2024-06-05 接受日期:2024-06-15 出版日期:2024-09-15 发布日期:2024-08-27
通讯作者: Li Guo, Min Zhang, Jing Chen E-mail:guoli@shnu.edu.cn;zhangminzm@shnu.edu.cn;chenjing@ustc.edu.cn
基金资助:
We thank W. Quan for helpful discussion. Project supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2019YFA0307700) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 12274300 and 12074261)

Time-energy distribution of photoelectron from atomic states with different magnetic quantum numbers in elliptically polarized laser fields

Jingyang Xu(徐菁阳)¹, Li Guo(郭丽)^1,†, Xin Qi(齐昕)¹, Ronghua Lu(陆荣华)², Min Zhang(张敏)^1,‡, Jingtao Zhang(张敬涛)¹, and Jing Chen(陈京)^3,4,§

1 Department of Physics, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China;
2 Key Laboratory for Quantum Optics and Center for Cold Atom Physics, Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, China;
3 Hefei National Research Center for Physical Sciences at the Microscale and School of Physical Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China;
4 Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Ultraintense Laser and Advanced Material Technology, College of Engineering Physics, Shenzhen Technology University, Shenzhen 518118, China

Received:2024-03-29 Revised:2024-06-05 Accepted:2024-06-15 Online:2024-09-15 Published:2024-08-27
Contact: Li Guo, Min Zhang, Jing Chen E-mail:guoli@shnu.edu.cn;zhangminzm@shnu.edu.cn;chenjing@ustc.edu.cn
Supported by:
We thank W. Quan for helpful discussion. Project supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2019YFA0307700) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 12274300 and 12074261)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： A Wigner-distribution-like (WDL) function based on the strong-field approximation (SFA) theory is used to investigate the ionization time of the photoelectron emitted from the initial states with different magnetic quantum number $m$ in elliptically polarized electric fields. The saddle-point method is adopted for comparisons. For different $m$ states, a discrepancy exists in the WDL distributions of the photoelectrons emitted in a direction close to the major axis of the laser field ellipse. Based on the saddle-point analysis, this discrepancy can be ascribed to the interference between electrons ionized from two tunneling instants. Our results show that the relationships between the tunneling instants and kinetic energy of photoelectrons are the same for different $m$ initial states when the Coulomb potential is not considered. Our work sheds some light on the ionization-time information of electrons from different magnetic quantum states.

关键词: strong-field ionization, Wigner-distribution-like, ionization instant

Abstract: A Wigner-distribution-like (WDL) function based on the strong-field approximation (SFA) theory is used to investigate the ionization time of the photoelectron emitted from the initial states with different magnetic quantum number $m$ in elliptically polarized electric fields. The saddle-point method is adopted for comparisons. For different $m$ states, a discrepancy exists in the WDL distributions of the photoelectrons emitted in a direction close to the major axis of the laser field ellipse. Based on the saddle-point analysis, this discrepancy can be ascribed to the interference between electrons ionized from two tunneling instants. Our results show that the relationships between the tunneling instants and kinetic energy of photoelectrons are the same for different $m$ initial states when the Coulomb potential is not considered. Our work sheds some light on the ionization-time information of electrons from different magnetic quantum states.

Key words: strong-field ionization, Wigner-distribution-like, ionization instant

中图分类号: (Multiphoton ionization and excitation to highly excited states (e.g., Rydberg states))

33.80.Rv

33.80.Wz (Other multiphoton processes) 42.50.Hz (Strong-field excitation of optical transitions in quantum systems; multiphoton processes; dynamic Stark shift)

Jingyang Xu(徐菁阳), Li Guo(郭丽), Xin Qi(齐昕), Ronghua Lu(陆荣华), Min Zhang(张敏), Jingtao Zhang(张敬涛), and Jing Chen(陈京). Time-energy distribution of photoelectron from atomic states with different magnetic quantum numbers in elliptically polarized laser fields[J]. 中国物理B, 2024, 33(9): 93301-093301.

参考文献

[1] Reiss H R 1980 Phys. Rev. A 22 1786
[2] Herath T, Yan L, Lee S K and Li W 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 043004
[3] Gajda M, Piraux B and Rzazewski K 1994 Phys. Rev. A 50 2528
[4] Barth I and Smirnova O 2011 Phys. Rev. A 84 063415
[5] Eckart S, Kunitski M, Richter M, Hartung A, Rist J, Trinter F, Fehre K, Schlott N, Henrichs K, Schmidt L P H, Jahnke T, Scöffler M, Liu K L, Barth I, Kaushal J, Morales F, Ivanov M, Smirnova O and Dörner R 2018 Nat. Phys. 14 701
[6] Li Y, Lan P F, Xie H, He M R, Zhu X S, Zhang Q B and Lu P X 2015 Opt. Express 23 028801
[7] Barth I and Lein M 2014 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 47 204016
[8] Beiser S, Klaiber M and Kiyan I Y 2004 Phys. Rev. A 70 011402
[9] Barth I and Smirnova O 2013 Phys. Rev. A 87 065401
[10] Rey H F and van der Hart H W 2014 Phys. Rev. A 90 033402
[11] Patchkovskii S, Vrakking M J J, Villeneuve D M and Niikura H 2020 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 53 134002
[12] Wang R R, Ma M Y, Wen L C, Guan Z, Yang Z Q, Jiao Z H, Wang G L and Zhao S F 2023 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 40 1749
[13] Liu K, Ni H C, Renziehausen K, Rost J M and Barth I 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 203201
[14] Torlina L, Morales F, Kaushal J, Ivanov I, Kheifets A, Zielinski A, Scrinzi A, Muller H G, Sukiasyan S, Ivanov M and Smirnova O 2015 Nat. Phys. 11 503
[15] Walker S, Kolanz L, Venzke J and Becker A 2021 Phys. Rev. Research 3 043051
[16] Walker S, Kolanz L, Venzke J and Becker A 2021 Phys. Rev. A 103 L061101
[17] Barth I and Smirnova O 2013 Phys. Rev. A 88 013401
[18] Barth I and Smirnova O 2013 Phys. Rev. A 87 013433
[19] Luo S Q, Li M, Xie W H, Liu K, Feng Y D, Du B J, Zhou Y M and Lu P X 2019 Phys. Rev. A 99 053422
[20] Ivanov I A 2016 Phys. Rev. A 93 053403
[21] Yuan M H and Bian X B 2015 Phys. Rev. A 101 013412
[22] Lin Z Y, Lin B Q and Chen Z X 2018 Acta Optica Sinica 38(6) 0602001
[23] Eckle P, Pfeiffer A N, Cirelli C, Staudte A, Diiörner R, Muller H G, Biiüttiker M and Keller U 2008 Science 322 1525
[24] Han M, Ge P P, Wang J G, Guo Z N, Fang Y Q, Ma X Y, Yu X Y, Deng Y K, Wörner H J, Gong Q H and Liu Y Q 2021 Nat. Photon. 15 765
[25] Yu M, Liu K, Li M, Yan J Q, Cao C P, Tan J, Liang J T, Guo K Y, Cao W, Lan P F, Zhang Q B, Zhou Y M and Lu P X 2022 Light: Sci. Appl. 11 215
[26] Guo L, Zhao M, Quan W, Liu X J and Chen J 2023 Optica 10 1316
[27] Liu M M, Shao Y, Han M, Ge P P, Deng Y, Wu C Y, Gong Q H and Liu Y Q 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 043201
[28] Trabert D, Hartung A, Eckart S, Trinter F, Kalinin A, Schöffler M, Schmidt L Ph H, Jahnke T, Kunitski M and Dörner R 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 043202
[29] Wen L C, Jing W Q, Sun C P, Gao X H, Jiao Z H, Wang G L, Chen J H and Zhao S F 2023 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 56 125601
[30] Xu S L, Zhang Q B, Fu X L, Huang X, Han X, Li M, Cao W and Lu P X 2020 Phys. Rev. A 102 063128
[31] Serebryannikov E E and Zheltikov A M 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 123901
[32] Guo L, Han S S and Chen J 2010 Opt. Express 18 1240
[33] Guo L, Han S S and Chen J 2012 Phys. Rev. A 86 053409
[34] Guo L, Chen S, Hu S L, Lu R H, Han S S, Zhang J T and Chen J 2022 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 55 225401
[35] Radzig A A and Smirnov B M 1985 Reference Data on Atoms, Molecules and Ions
[36] Figueira de Morisson Faria C, Schomerus H and Becker W 2002 Phys. Rev. A 66 043413

Time-energy distribution of photoelectron from atomic states with different magnetic quantum numbers in elliptically polarized laser fields

Time-energy distribution of photoelectron from atomic states with different magnetic quantum numbers in elliptically polarized laser fields

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 7

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	Yongzhe Ma(马永哲), Hongcheng Ni(倪宏程), and Jian Wu(吴健). Attosecond ionization time delays in strong-field physics[J]. 中国物理B, 2024, 33(1): 13201-13201.
[2]	Chao Chen(陈超), Jiayin Che(车佳殷), Xuejiao Xie(谢雪娇), Shang Wang(王赏), Guoguo Xin(辛国国), and Yanjun Chen(陈彦军). Strong-field response time and its implications on attosecond measurement[J]. 中国物理B, 2022, 31(3): 33201-033201.
[3]	Shun Wang(王顺), Shahab Ullah Khan, Xiao-Qing Tian(田晓庆), Hui-Bin Sun(孙慧斌), and Wei-Chao Jiang(姜维超). Comparative study of photoionization of atomic hydrogen by solving the one- and three-dimensional time-dependent Schrödinger equations[J]. 中国物理B, 2021, 30(8): 83301-083301.
[4]	Mingrui He(何明睿), Yang Fan(樊洋), Yueming Zhou(周月明), and Peixiang Lu(陆培祥). Taking snapshots of a moving electron wave packet in molecules using photoelectron holography in strong-field tunneling ionization[J]. 中国物理B, 2021, 30(12): 123202-123202.
[5]	赖炫扬, 柳晓军. Bohmian trajectory perspective on strong field atomic processes[J]. 中国物理B, 2020, 29(1): 13205-013205.
[6]	马俊杨, 林康, 季琴颖, 张文斌, 李韩笑, 孙烽豪, 强俊杰, 陆培芬, 李辉, 宫晓春, 吴健. Coulomb exploded directional double ionization of N₂O molecules in multicycle femtosecond laser pulses[J]. 中国物理B, 2019, 28(9): 93301-093301.
[7]	陈富军, 姚汝贤, 罗江华, 王长清. Backward rescattered photoelectron holography in strong-field ionization[J]. 中国物理B, 2018, 27(10): 103202-103202.