Strong-field response time and its implications on attosecond measurement

doi:10.1088/1674-1056/ac29ab

中国物理B ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (3): 33201-033201.doi: 10.1088/1674-1056/ac29ab

所属专题： SPECIAL TOPIC — Optical field manipulation

Strong-field response time and its implications on attosecond measurement

Chao Chen(陈超)^1,†, Jiayin Che(车佳殷)^1,†, Xuejiao Xie(谢雪娇)¹, Shang Wang(王赏)^1,2, Guoguo Xin(辛国国)^3,‡, and Yanjun Chen(陈彦军)^1,§

1 College of Physics and Information Technology, Shaan'xi Normal University, Xi'an 710119, China;
2 College of Physics and Hebei Key Laboratory of Photophysics Research and Application, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang 050024, China;
3 School of Physics, Northwest University, Xi'an 710127, China

收稿日期:2021-05-24 修回日期:2021-09-17 接受日期:2021-09-24 出版日期:2022-02-22 发布日期:2022-03-01
通讯作者: Guoguo Xin, Yanjun Chen E-mail:xinguo@nwu.edu.cn;chenyjhb@gmail.com
基金资助:
Project supported by the National Natural Science Foun dation of China (Grant No. 91750111) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFB0504400).

Strong-field response time and its implications on attosecond measurement

Chao Chen(陈超)^1,†, Jiayin Che(车佳殷)^1,†, Xuejiao Xie(谢雪娇)¹, Shang Wang(王赏)^1,2, Guoguo Xin(辛国国)^3,‡, and Yanjun Chen(陈彦军)^1,§

1 College of Physics and Information Technology, Shaan'xi Normal University, Xi'an 710119, China;
2 College of Physics and Hebei Key Laboratory of Photophysics Research and Application, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang 050024, China;
3 School of Physics, Northwest University, Xi'an 710127, China

Received:2021-05-24 Revised:2021-09-17 Accepted:2021-09-24 Online:2022-02-22 Published:2022-03-01
Contact: Guoguo Xin, Yanjun Chen E-mail:xinguo@nwu.edu.cn;chenyjhb@gmail.com
Supported by:
Project supported by the National Natural Science Foun dation of China (Grant No. 91750111) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFB0504400).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： To measure and control the electron motion in atoms and molecules by the strong laser field on the attosecond time scale is one of the research frontiers of atomic and molecular photophysics. It involves many new phenomena and processes and raises a series of questions of concepts, theories, and methods. Recent studies show that the Coulomb potential can cause the ionization time lag (about 100 attoseconds) between instants of the field maximum and the ionization-rate maximum. This lag can be understood as the response time of the electronic wave function to the strong-field-induced ionization event. It has a profound influence on the subsequent ultrafast dynamics of the ionized electron and can significantly change the time—frequency properties of electron trajectory (an important theoretical tool for attosecond measurement). Here, the research progress of response time and its implications on attosecond measurement are briefly introduced.

关键词: response time, strong-field ionization, Coulomb effect, attosecond measurement

Abstract: To measure and control the electron motion in atoms and molecules by the strong laser field on the attosecond time scale is one of the research frontiers of atomic and molecular photophysics. It involves many new phenomena and processes and raises a series of questions of concepts, theories, and methods. Recent studies show that the Coulomb potential can cause the ionization time lag (about 100 attoseconds) between instants of the field maximum and the ionization-rate maximum. This lag can be understood as the response time of the electronic wave function to the strong-field-induced ionization event. It has a profound influence on the subsequent ultrafast dynamics of the ionized electron and can significantly change the time—frequency properties of electron trajectory (an important theoretical tool for attosecond measurement). Here, the research progress of response time and its implications on attosecond measurement are briefly introduced.

Key words: response time, strong-field ionization, Coulomb effect, attosecond measurement

中图分类号: (Photoionization and excitation)

32.80.-t

42.65.Re (Ultrafast processes; optical pulse generation and pulse compression) 42.50.Hz (Strong-field excitation of optical transitions in quantum systems; multiphoton processes; dynamic Stark shift)

Chao Chen(陈超), Jiayin Che(车佳殷), Xuejiao Xie(谢雪娇), Shang Wang(王赏), Guoguo Xin(辛国国), and Yanjun Chen(陈彦军). Strong-field response time and its implications on attosecond measurement[J]. 中国物理B, 2022, 31(3): 33201-033201.

参考文献

[1] Keldysh L V 1965 Sov. Phys. JETP 20 1307
[2] Ammosov M V, Delone N B and Krainov V P 1986 Sov. Phys. JETP 64 1191
[3] Schafer K J, Yang B, DiMauro L I and Kulander K C 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 1599
[4] Yang B, Schafer K J, Walker B, Kulander K C, Agostini P and DiMauro L F 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 3770
[5] Lewenstein M, Kulander K C, Schafer K J and Bucksbaum P H 1995 Phys. Rev. A 51 1495
[6] Becker W, Grasbon F, Kopold R, Milošević D B, Paulus G G and Walther H 2002 Adv. At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 48 35
[7] Xu L and Fu L B 2019 Chin. Phys. Lett. 36 043202
[8] Yuan J Y, Ma Y X, Li R Y, Ma H Y, Zhang Y Z, Ye D F, Shen Z J, Yan T M, Wang X C, Weidemüller M and Jiang Y H 2020 Chin. Phys. Lett. 37 053201
[9] McPherson A, Gibson G, Jara H, Johann U, Luk T S, McIntyre I A, Boyer K and Rhodes C K 1987 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 4 595
[10] L'Huillier A, Schafer K J and Kulander K C 1991 J. Phys. B 24 3315
[11] Corkum P B 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 1994
[12] Lewenstein M, Balcou Ph, Ivanov M Yu, L'Huillier A and Corkum P B 1994 Phys. Rev. A 49 2117
[13] Pan Y, Guo F M, Yang Y J and Ding D J 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 113201
[14] Zhang H D, Guo J, Shi Y, Du H, Liu H F, Huang X R, Liu X S and Jing J 2017 Chin. Phys. Lett. 34 014206
[15] Niikura Hiromichi, Legare F, Hasbani R, Ivanov Misha Yu, Villeneuve D M and Corkum P B 2003 Nature 421 826
[16] Zeidler D, Staudte A, Bardon A B, Villeneuve D M, Dörner R and Corkum P B 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 203003
[17] Becker W, Liu X, Ho P J and Eberly J H 2012 Rev. Mod. Phys. 84 1011
[18] Chen J H, Xu D D, Han T, Sun Y, Xu Q Y and Liu X S 2020 Chin. Phys. B 29 013203
[19] Li F, Yang Y J, Chen J, Liu X J, Wei Z Y and Wang B B 2020 Chin. Phys. Lett. 37 113201
[20] Krausz F and Ivanov M 2009 Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 163
[21] Lepine F, Ivanov M Y and Vrakking M J J 2014 Nat. Photon. 8 195
[22] Eckle P, Pfeiffer A N, Cirelli C, Staudte A, Dörner R, Muller H G, Buttiker M and Keller U 2008 Science 322 1525
[23] Shu Z, Hao X L, Li W D and Chen J 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 050301
[24] Xiao Z L, Quan W, Xu S P, Yu S G, Lai X Y, Chen J and Liu X J 2020 Chin. Phys. Lett. 37 043201
[25] Xu S L, Zhang Q B, Ran C, Huang X, Cao W and Lu P X 2021 Chin. Phys. B 30 013202
[26] Luo J H, Li J and Zhang H F 2020 Chin. Phys. B 29 123201
[27] Shafir D, Soifer H, Bruner B D, Dagan M, Mairesse Y, Patchkovskii S, Ivanov M Yu, Smirnova O and Dudovich N 2012 Nature 485 343
[28] Dahlstrom J M, L'Huillier A and Maquet A 2012 J. Phys. B 45 183001
[29] Wei C L and Zhao X 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 013201
[30] Leone S R, McCurdy C W, Burgdorfer J, et al. 2014 Nat. Photon. 8 162
[31] Muga J G, Sala Mayato R and Egusquiza Í L (eds.)2002 Time in Quantum Mechanics (Vol. 1) (Berlin, Heidelberg:Springer) pp. 5-6
[32] Maquet A, Caillat J and Taïeb R 2014 J. Phys. B 47 204004
[33] Pazourek R, Nagele S, Burgdörfer J 2015 Rev. Mod. Phys. 87 765
[34] Xie X J, Chen C, Xin G G, Liu J and Chen Y J 2020 Opt. Express 28 33228
[35] Wang S, Cai J and Chen Y J 2017 Phys. Rev. A 96 043413
[36] Wang S, Che J Y, Chen C, Xin G G and Chen Y J 2020 Phys. Rev. A 102 053103
[37] Lein M, Hay N, Velotta R, Marangos J P and Knight P L 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 183903
[38] Chen Y J, Liu J and Hu Bambi 2009 Phys. Rev. A 79 033405
[39] Frumker E, Hebeisen C T, Kajumba N, Bertrand J B, Wörner H J, Spanner M, Villeneuve D M, Naumov A and Corkum P B 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 113901
[40] Etches A, Gaarde M B and Madsen L B 2012 Phys. Rev. A 86 023818
[41] Li W Y, Yu S J, Wang S and Chen Y J 2016 Phys. Rev. A 94 053407
[42] Brabec T, Ivanov M Yu and Corkum P B 1996 Phys. Rev. A 54 R2551
[43] Milošević D B, Paulus G G, Bauer D and Becker W 2006 J. Phys. B 39 R203
[44] Blaga C I, Catoire F, Colosimo P, Paulus G G, Muller H G, Agostini P and DiM L F 2009 Nat. Phys. 5 335
[45] Goreslavski S P, Paulus G G, Popruzhenko S V and Shvetsov-Shilovski N I 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 233002
[46] Yan T M, Popruzhenko S V, Vrakking M J J and Bauer D 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 253002
[47] Feit M D, Fleck J A, Jr and Steiger A 1982 J. Comput. Phys. 47 412
[48] Yan T M, Popruzhenko S V, Vrakking M J J and Bauer D 2013 Trajectory-based Coulomb-corrected strong field approximation (Springer) 104 pp. 1-16
[49] Milošević D B and Becker W 2002 Phys. Rev. A 66 063417
[50] Ren D X, Wang S, Chen C, Li X K, Yu X T, Zhao X N, Ma P, Wang C C, Luo S Z, Chen Y J and Ding D J 2021 arXiv:2105.07619[physics.atom-ph]
[51] Sainadh U S, Xu H, Wang X, Atia-Tul-Noor A, Wallace W C, Douguet N, Bray A, Ivanov I, Bartschat K, Kheifets A, Sang R T and Litvinyuk I V 2019 Nature 568 75
[52] Han M, Ge P P, Fang Y Q, Yu X Y, Guo Z N, Ma X Y, Deng Y K, Gong Q H and Liu Y Q 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 073201
[53] Chen Y J 2011 Phys. Rev. A 84 043423
[54] Torlina L and Smirnova O 2017 New J. Phys. 19 023012
[55] Che J Y, Chen C, Wang S, Xin G G and Chen Y J 2021 Phys. Rev. A 104 063104
[56] Che J Y, Chen C, Wang S, Xin G G and Chen Y J 2021 arXiv:2103.16876[physics.atom-ph]
[57] Wang S, Xu R H, Li W Y, Liu X, Li W, Xin G G and Chen Y J 2020 Opt. Express 28 4650
[58] Norreys P A, Zepf M, Moustaizis S, Fews A P, Zhang J, Lee P, Bakarezos M, Danson C N, Dyson A, Gibbon P, Loukakos P, Neely D, Walsh F N, Wark J S and Dangor A E 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 76 1832
[59] von der Linde D, Sokolowski-Tinten K and Bialkowski J 1997 Appl. Surf. Sci. 109-110 1
[60] Hohenleutner M, Langer F, Schubert O, Knorr M, Huttner U, Koch S W, Kira M and Huber R 2015 Nature 523 572
[61] Ghimire S and Reis D A 2019 Nat. Phys. 15 10
[62] Heissler P, Lugovoy E, Hörlein R, Waldecker L, Wenz J, Heigoldt M, Khrennikov K, Karsch S, Krausz F, Abel B and Tsakiris G D 2014 New J. Phys. 16 113045
[63] Luu T T, Yin Z, Jain A, Gaumnitz T, Pertot Y, Ma J and Wörner H J 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 3723
[64] Zeng A W and Bian X B 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 203901
[65] Donnelly T D, Ditmire T, Neuman K, Perry M D and Falcone R W 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 76 2472
[66] Fennel Th, Meiwes-Broer K H, Tiggesbäumker J, Reinhard P G, Dinh P M and Suraud E 2010 Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 1793
[67] Hamster H, Sullivan A, Gordon S, White W and Falcone R W 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 2725
[68] Teubner U and Gibbon P 2009 Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 445

Strong-field response time and its implications on attosecond measurement

Strong-field response time and its implications on attosecond measurement

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 11

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	Shun Wang(王顺), Shahab Ullah Khan, Xiao-Qing Tian(田晓庆), Hui-Bin Sun(孙慧斌), and Wei-Chao Jiang(姜维超). Comparative study of photoionization of atomic hydrogen by solving the one- and three-dimensional time-dependent Schrödinger equations[J]. 中国物理B, 2021, 30(8): 83301-083301.
[2]	Mingrui He(何明睿), Yang Fan(樊洋), Yueming Zhou(周月明), and Peixiang Lu(陆培祥). Taking snapshots of a moving electron wave packet in molecules using photoelectron holography in strong-field tunneling ionization[J]. 中国物理B, 2021, 30(12): 123202-123202.
[3]	赖炫扬, 柳晓军. Bohmian trajectory perspective on strong field atomic processes[J]. 中国物理B, 2020, 29(1): 13205-013205.
[4]	马俊杨, 林康, 季琴颖, 张文斌, 李韩笑, 孙烽豪, 强俊杰, 陆培芬, 李辉, 宫晓春, 吴健. Coulomb exploded directional double ionization of N₂O molecules in multicycle femtosecond laser pulses[J]. 中国物理B, 2019, 28(9): 93301-093301.
[5]	Geeta Yadav, Govind Pathak, Kaushlendra Agrahari, Mahendra Kumar, Mohd Sajid Khan, V S Chandel, Rajiv Manohar. Improved dielectric and electro-optical parameters of nematic liquid crystal doped with magnetic nanoparticles[J]. 中国物理B, 2019, 28(3): 34209-034209.
[6]	陈富军, 姚汝贤, 罗江华, 王长清. Backward rescattered photoelectron holography in strong-field ionization[J]. 中国物理B, 2018, 27(10): 103202-103202.
[7]	白学坤, 卜胜利, 王伦唯, 王响, 于国君, 继红柱. Tunable magneto–optic modulation based on magnetically responsive nanostructured magnetic fluid[J]. 中国物理B, 2011, 20(10): 107501-107501.
[8]	葛愉成. Quantum-mechanical analysis of pulse reconstruction for a narrow bandwidth attosecond x-ray pulse[J]. 中国物理B, 2009, 18(4): 1473-1478.
[9]	梁玉洁, 李岩松, 朱民, 刘祖华, 周宏余. Coulomb effects on the formation of proton halo nuclei[J]. 中国物理B, 2009, 18(12): 5267-5271.
[10]	葛愉成. Use of photoelectron laser phase determination method for attosecond measurements with quantum-mechanical calculations[J]. 中国物理B, 2008, 17(6): 2072-2077.
[11]	张义门, 周拥华, 张玉明. The simulation of temperature dependence of responsivity and response time for 6H-SiC UV photodetector[J]. 中国物理B, 2007, 16(5): 1276-1279.