Quantitative calculation of reaction performance in sonochemical reactor by bubble dynamics

doi:10.1088/1674-1056/24/10/104301

中国物理B ›› 2015, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (10): 104301-104301.doi: 10.1088/1674-1056/24/10/104301

• ELECTROMAGNETISM, OPTICS, ACOUSTICS, HEAT TRANSFER, CLASSICAL MECHANICS, AND FLUID DYNAMICS • 上一篇下一篇

Quantitative calculation of reaction performance in sonochemical reactor by bubble dynamics

徐峥^{a b}, 安田启司^b, 刘晓峻^c

a School of Physics Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China;
b Department of Chemical Engineering, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8603, Japan;
c School of Physics, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China

收稿日期:2015-03-12 修回日期:2015-04-24 出版日期:2015-10-05 发布日期:2015-10-05
基金资助:
Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11404245, 11204129, and 11211140039).

Quantitative calculation of reaction performance in sonochemical reactor by bubble dynamics

Xu Zheng (徐峥)^{a b}, Yasuda Keiji (安田启司)^b, Liu Xiao-Jun (刘晓峻)^c

a School of Physics Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China;
b Department of Chemical Engineering, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8603, Japan;
c School of Physics, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China

Received:2015-03-12 Revised:2015-04-24 Online:2015-10-05 Published:2015-10-05
Contact: Liu Xiao-Jun E-mail:liuxiaojun@nju.edu.cn
Supported by:
Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11404245, 11204129, and 11211140039).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： In order to design a sonochemical reactor with high reaction efficiency, it is important to clarify the size and intensity of the sonochemical reaction field. In this study, the reaction field in a sonochemical reactor is estimated from the distribution of pressure above the threshold for cavitation. The quantitation of hydroxide radical in a sonochemical reactor is obtained from the calculation of bubble dynamics and reaction equations. The distribution of the reaction field of the numerical simulation is consistent with that of the sonochemical luminescence. The sound absorption coefficient of liquid in the sonochemical reactor is much larger than that attributed to classical contributions which are heat conduction and shear viscosity. Under the dual irradiation, the reaction field becomes extensive and intensive because the acoustic pressure amplitude is intensified by the interference of two ultrasonic waves.

关键词: reaction field, cavitation, bubble dynamics, hydroxide radical

Abstract: In order to design a sonochemical reactor with high reaction efficiency, it is important to clarify the size and intensity of the sonochemical reaction field. In this study, the reaction field in a sonochemical reactor is estimated from the distribution of pressure above the threshold for cavitation. The quantitation of hydroxide radical in a sonochemical reactor is obtained from the calculation of bubble dynamics and reaction equations. The distribution of the reaction field of the numerical simulation is consistent with that of the sonochemical luminescence. The sound absorption coefficient of liquid in the sonochemical reactor is much larger than that attributed to classical contributions which are heat conduction and shear viscosity. Under the dual irradiation, the reaction field becomes extensive and intensive because the acoustic pressure amplitude is intensified by the interference of two ultrasonic waves.

Key words: reaction field, cavitation, bubble dynamics, hydroxide radical

中图分类号: (Ultrasonics, quantum acoustics, and physical effects of sound)

43.35.+d

43.38.+n (Transduction; acoustical devices for the generation and reproduction of sound)

徐峥, 安田启司, 刘晓峻. Quantitative calculation of reaction performance in sonochemical reactor by bubble dynamics[J]. 中国物理B, 2015, 24(10): 104301-104301.

Xu Zheng (徐峥), Yasuda Keiji (安田启司), Liu Xiao-Jun (刘晓峻). Quantitative calculation of reaction performance in sonochemical reactor by bubble dynamics[J]. Chin. Phys. B, 2015, 24(10): 104301-104301.

参考文献 36

[1]	Henglein A 1987 Ultrasonics 25 6
[2]	Gedanken A 2004 Ultrason. Sonochem. 11 47
[3]	Moholkar V S, Warmoeskerken M M G C, Ohl C D and Prosperetti A 2004 AIChE J. 50 58
[4]	Flint E B and Suslick K S 1991 Science 253 1397
[5]	Wu X M, Zhang S G and Zhang B X 2014 Acta Phys. Sin. 63 194302 (in Chinese)
[6]	Liu X Z, Zhu Y, Zhang F and Gong X F 2013 Chin. Phys. B 22 024301
[7]	Suslick K S and Flannigan D J 2008 Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 59 659
[8]	Chowdhury P and Viraraghavan T 2009 Sci. Total Environ. 407 2474
[9]	Neppiras E A 1980 Phys. Rep. 61 159
[10]	Brotchie A, Grieser F and Ashokkumar M 2008 J. Phys. Chem. C 112 10247
[11]	Feng R, Zhao R, Zhu C and Mason T J 2002 Ultrason. Sonochem. 9 231
[12]	Brotchie A, Ashokkumar M and Grieser F 2007 J. Phys. Chem. C 111 3066
[13]	Sivakumar M, Tatake P A and Pandit A B 2002 Chem. Eng. J. 85 327
[14]	Yasuda K, Torii T, Yasui K, Iida Y, Tuziuti T, Nakamura M and Asakura Y 2007 Ultrason. Sonochem. 14 699
[15]	Koda S, Kimura T, Kondon T and Mitome H 2003 Ultrason. Sonochem. 10 149
[16]	Klíma J, Frias-Ferrer A, González-García J, Ludvík J, Sáez V and Iniesta J 2007 Ultrason. Sonochem. 14 19
[17]	Yasui K, Kozuka T, Tuziuti T, Towata A, Iida Y, King J and Macey P 2007 Ultrason. Sonochem. 14 605
[18]	Servant G, Caltagirone J P, Gérard A, Laborde J L and Hita A 2000 Ultrason. Sonochem. 7 217
[19]	Servant G, Laborde J L, Hita A, Caltagirone J P and Gérard A 2003 Ultrason. Sonochem. 10 347
[20]	Moholkar V S, Rekveld S and Warmoeskerken M M C G 2000 Ultrasonics 38 666
[21]	Kanthale P M, Gogate P R and Pandit A B 2007 Chem. Eng. J. 127 71
[22]	Flint E B and Suslick K S 1991 Science 253 1397
[23]	Yasui K 1996 J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 65 2830
[24]	Yasui K 1997 Phys. Rev. E 56 6750
[25]	Kojima Y, Asakura Y, Sugiyama G and Koda S 2010 Ultrason. Sonochem. 17 978
[26]	Yanagida H, Masubuchi Y, Minagawa K, Takimoto J, Oqata T and Koyama K 2000 Ultrasonics 38 671
[27]	Yasui K, Tuziuti T, Lee J, Kozuka T, Towata A and Iida Y 2008 J. Chem. Phys. 128 184705
[28]	Dähnke S, Swamy K M and Keil F J 1999 Ultrason. Sonochem. 6 31
[29]	Servant G, Labordea J L, Hita A, Caltagirone J P and Gérard A 2001 Ultrason. Sonochem. 8 163
[30]	Jamshidi R, Pohl B, Peuker U A and Brenner G 2012 Chem. Eng. J. 189 364
[31]	Burton C J 1948 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 20 186
[32]	Hall L 1948 Phys. Rev. 73 775
[33]	Xu Z, Yasuda K and Koda S 2013 Ultrason. Sonochem. 20 452
[34]	Mitome H 1991 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 30 60
[35]	Yasui K, Tuziuti T, Kozuka T, Towata A and Iida Y 2007 J. Chem. Phys. 127 154502
[36]	Yasuda K, Tachi M, Bando Y and Nakamura M 1999 J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 32 347

Quantitative calculation of reaction performance in sonochemical reactor by bubble dynamics

Quantitative calculation of reaction performance in sonochemical reactor by bubble dynamics

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 36

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	Qing-Qin Zou(邹青钦), Shuang Lei(雷双), Zhang-Yong Li(李章勇), and Dui Qin(秦对). Effects of adjacent bubble on spatiotemporal evolutions of mechanical stresses surrounding bubbles oscillating in tissues[J]. 中国物理B, 2023, 32(1): 14302-014302.
[2]	Hua Xie(谢华), Yuequn Xu(徐跃群), and Cheng Zhong(钟成). A study of cavitation nucleation in pure water using molecular dynamics simulation[J]. 中国物理B, 2022, 31(11): 114701-114701.
[3]	张玲玲, 陈伟中, 张圆媛, 武耀蓉, 王寻, 赵帼英. Bubble translation driven by pulsation in a double-bubble system[J]. 中国物理B, 2020, 29(3): 34303-034303.
[4]	沈壮志. Theoretical estimation of sonochemical yield in bubble cluster in acoustic field[J]. 中国物理B, 2020, 29(1): 14304-014304.
[5]	孙晶, 沈壮志, 莫润阳. Theoretical prediction of the yield of strong oxides under acoustic cavitation[J]. 中国物理B, 2019, 28(1): 14301-014301.
[6]	范鹏飞, 于洁, 杨鑫, 屠娟, 郭霞生, 黄品同, 章东. Impact of cavitation on lesion formation induced by high intensity focused ultrasound[J]. 中国物理B, 2017, 26(5): 54301-054301.
[7]	王宝, 汪家道, 陈大融, 孙娜, 王涛. Experimental investigation on underwater drag reduction using partial cavitation[J]. 中国物理B, 2017, 26(5): 54701-054701.
[8]	许欢, 范鹏飞, 马勇, 郭霞生, 杨平, 屠娟, 章东. Study on shock wave-induced cavitation bubbles dissolution process[J]. 中国物理B, 2017, 26(2): 24301-024301.
[9]	时洁, 杨德森, 时胜国, 胡博, 张昊阳, 胡诗涌. Bubble nonlinear dynamics and stimulated scattering process[J]. 中国物理B, 2016, 25(2): 24304-024304.
[10]	滕旭东, 郭霞生, 屠娟, 章东. Nonlinear response of ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles: From fundamentals to applications[J]. 中国物理B, 2016, 25(12): 124308-124308.
[11]	王焕磊, 范鹏飞, 郭霞生, 屠娟, 马勇, 章东. Ultrasound-mediated transdermal drug delivery of fluorescent nanoparticles and hyaluronic acid into porcine skin in vitro[J]. 中国物理B, 2016, 25(12): 124314-124314.
[12]	叶鹏程, 潘光. Properties of sound attenuation around a two-dimensional underwater vehicle with a large cavitation number[J]. 中国物理B, 2015, 24(6): 66401-066401.
[13]	邵纬航, 陈伟中. Effect of supercritical water shell on cavitation bubble dynamics[J]. 中国物理B, 2015, 24(5): 54701-054701.
[14]	Mahdi Daemi, Mohammad Taeibi-Rahni, Hamidreza Massah. Study of acoustic bubble cluster dynamics using a lattice Boltzmann model[J]. , 2015, 24(2): 24302-024302.
[15]	张春兵, 刘政, 郭霞生, 章东. Correlation between microbubble-induced acoustic cavitation and hemolysis in vitro[J]. 中国物理B, 2011, 20(2): 24301-024301.