Cross sections of Oq+(q=1 - 4) electron loss in collisions with He, Ne and Ar

doi:10.1088/1674-1056/20/3/033402

中国物理B ›› 2011, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (3): 33402-033402.doi: 10.1088/1674-1056/20/3/033402

• ATOMIC AND MOLECULAR PHYSICS • 上一篇下一篇

Cross sections of O^q+(q=1 - 4) electron loss in collisions with He, Ne and Ar

鲁彦霞, 路兴强, 宋想, 张泊丽

School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of South China, Hengyang 421001, China

收稿日期:2010-04-21 修回日期:2010-07-21 出版日期:2011-03-15 发布日期:2011-03-15
基金资助:
Project supported by the Special Foundation for Key Programs of Basic Research at its earlier stage, Ministry of Science and Technology, China(Grant No. 2002CCA00900) and by the Foundation for the Doctors of University of South China (Grant No. 5-2007-XQD

Cross sections of O^q+(q=1 - 4) electron loss in collisions with He, Ne and Ar

Lu Yan-Xia(鲁彦霞)^†, Lu Xing-Qiang(路兴强), Song Xiang(宋想), and Zhang Bo-Li(张泊丽)

School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of South China, Hengyang 421001, China

Received:2010-04-21 Revised:2010-07-21 Online:2011-03-15 Published:2011-03-15
Supported by:
Project supported by the Special Foundation for Key Programs of Basic Research at its earlier stage, Ministry of Science and Technology, China(Grant No. 2002CCA00900) and by the Foundation for the Doctors of University of South China (Grant No. 5-2007-XQD-001).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： Electron-loss cross sections of O^q+ (q=1-4) colliding with He, Ne and Ar atoms are measured in the intermediate velocity regime. The ratios of the cross sections of two-electron loss to that of one-electron loss R₂₁ are presented. It is shown that single-channel analysis is not sufficient to explain the results, but that projectile electron loss, electron capture by the projectile and target ionization must be considered together to interpret the experimental data. The screening and antiscreening effects can account for the threshold velocity results, but cannot explain the dependence of the ratio R₂₁ on velocity quantitatively. In general, the effective charge of the target atom increases with velocity increasing because the high-speed projectile ion can penetrate into the inner electronic shell of target atom. Ne and Ar atoms have similar effective charges in this velocity regime, but He atoms have smaller ones at the same velocities due to its smaller nuclear charge.

Abstract: Electron-loss cross sections of O^q+ (q=1-4) colliding with He, Ne and Ar atoms are measured in the intermediate velocity regime. The ratios of the cross sections of two-electron loss to that of one-electron loss R₂₁ are presented. It is shown that single-channel analysis is not sufficient to explain the results, but that projectile electron loss, electron capture by the projectile and target ionization must be considered together to interpret the experimental data. The screening and antiscreening effects can account for the threshold velocity results, but cannot explain the dependence of the ratio R₂₁ on velocity quantitatively. In general, the effective charge of the target atom increases with velocity increasing because the high-speed projectile ion can penetrate into the inner electronic shell of target atom. Ne and Ar atoms have similar effective charges in this velocity regime, but He atoms have smaller ones at the same velocities due to its smaller nuclear charge.

Key words: ion--atom collision, cross section, electron loss

中图分类号: (Electronic excitation and ionization of atoms (including beam-foil excitation and ionization))

34.50.Fa

52.20.Hv (Atomic, molecular, ion, and heavy-particle collisions)

鲁彦霞, 路兴强, 宋想, 张泊丽. Cross sections of O^q+(q=1 - 4) electron loss in collisions with He, Ne and Ar[J]. 中国物理B, 2011, 20(3): 33402-033402.

Lu Yan-Xia(鲁彦霞), Lu Xing-Qiang(路兴强), Song Xiang(宋想), and Zhang Bo-Li(张泊丽). Cross sections of O^q+(q=1 - 4) electron loss in collisions with He, Ne and Ar[J]. Chin. Phys. B, 2011, 20(3): 33402-033402.

参考文献 28

[1]	Lu Y X, Chen X M, Ding B W, Fu H B, Cui Y, Shao J X, Zhang H Q and Gao Z M 2007 Acta Phys. Sin. 56 4461 (in Chinese)
[2]	Chen X M, Lu Y X, Ding B W, Liu Y W, Cui Y, Gao Z M, Fu H B, Du J and Shao J X 2007 Chin. Phys. 16 2384
[3]	Chen X M, Lu Y X, Gao Z M, Cui Y, Liu Y W and Du J 2007 Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B 262 161
[4]	Lu Y X, Xiao D T, Yu T, Liu L J, Chen X M, Cui Y and Shao J X 2009 Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B 267 474
[5]	Sattin F 2001 Phys. Rev. A 64 034704
[6]	Matveev V I, Ryabchenko S V, Matrasulov D U, Rakhimov K Y, Fritzsche S and St"ohlker T 2009 Phys. Rev. A 79 042710
[7]	Wolff W, Luna H, Santos A C F, Montenegro E C and Sigaud G M 2009 Phys. Rev. A 80 032703
[8]	Montenegro E C, Sigaud G M and Meyerhof W E 1992 Phys. Rev. A 45 1575
[9]	Montenegro E C, Meyerhof W E and McGuire J H 1994 Adv. At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 34 249
[10]	McGuire J H, Stolterfoht N and Simony P R 1981 Phys. Rev. A 24 97
[11]	Senger B, Wittendorp R E and Rechenmann R V 1982 Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B 194 437
[12]	Sant'Anna M M, Melo W S, Santos A C F, Sigaud G M and Montenegro E C 1995 Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B 99 46
[13]	Sigaud G M, Jora's F S, Santos A C F, Montenegro E C, Sant'Anna M M and Melo W S 1997 Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B 132 312
[14]	Brendle' B, Gayet R, Rozet J P and Wohrer K 1985 Phys. Rev. Lett. 54 2007
[15]	Wohrer K, Chetioui A, Rozet J P, Jolly A, Fernandez F, Stephan C, Brendle' B and Gayet R 1986 J. Phys. B 19 1997
[16]	Xu X Y, Montenegro E C, Anholt R, Danzmann K, Meyerhof W E, Schlachter A S, Rude B S and McDonald R J 1988 Phys. Rev. A 38 1848
[17]	Chung H K, Lee R W and Chen M H 2007 High Energy Density Physics 3 342
[18]	Chabot M, Wohrer K, Chetioui A, Rozet J P, Touati A, Vernhet D, Politis M F, Stephan C, Grandin J P, Macias A, Martin F, Riera A, Sanz J L and Gayet R 1994 J. Phys. B 27 111
[19]	Walters H R J 1975 J. Phys. B 8 54
[20]	Woitke O, Za'vodszky P A, Ferguson S M, Houck J H and Tanis J A 1998 Phys. Rev. A 57 2692
[21]	Grande P L, Schiwietz G, Sigaud G M and Montenegro E C 1996 Phys. Rev. A 54 2983
[22]	McGuire J H 1987 Phys. Rev. A 36 1114
[23]	Santos A C F, Melo W S, Sant'Anna M M, Sigaud G M and Montenegro E C 2001 Phys. Rev. A 63 062717
[24]	Liu J B, Wang Y and Zhou Y J 2007 Chin. Phys. 16 0072
[25]	Shi D H, Sun J F, Zhu Z L, Ma H, Liu Y F and Yang X D 2007 Chin. Phys. 16 1655
[26]	Yu C R 2008 Chin. Phys. B 17 2097
[27]	Chi B Q, Liu L and Wang J G 2008 Chin. Phys. B 17 2890
[28]	Zhu X L Ma X W Li B Feng W T Zhang S F Liu H P Qian D B and Zhang D C 2010 Acta Phys. Sin 59 0620 (in Chinese) endfootnotesize

Cross sections of O^q+(q=1 - 4) electron loss in collisions with He, Ne and Ar

Cross sections of O^q+(q=1 - 4) electron loss in collisions with He, Ne and Ar

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 28

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	Shu-Xing Wang(汪书兴) and Lin-Fan Zhu(朱林繁). Integral cross sections for electron impact excitations of argon and carbon dioxide[J]. 中国物理B, 2022, 31(8): 83401-083401.
[2]	Yu-Long Ma(马玉龙), Ling Liu(刘玲), Lu-You Xie(颉录有), Yong Wu(吴勇), Deng-Hong Zhang(张登红), Chen-Zhong Dong(董晨钟), Yi-Zhi Qu(屈一至), and Jian-Guo Wang(王建国). Debye-screening effect on electron-impact excitation of helium-like Al¹¹⁺ and Fe²⁴⁺ ions[J]. 中国物理B, 2022, 31(4): 43401-043401.
[3]	Guo-Jie Bian(卞国杰), Jyh-Ching Chang(张稚卿), Ke-Ning Huang(黄克宁), Chen-Sheng Wu(武晨晟), Yong-Jun Cheng(程勇军), Kai Wang(王凯), and Yong Wu(吴勇). Electron-impact ionization cross section calculations for lithium-like ions[J]. 中国物理B, 2022, 31(1): 13401-013401.
[4]	. [J]. 中国物理B, 2020, 29(12): 120301-.
[5]	张延惠, 徐秀兰, 康丽莎, 蔡祥吉, 唐旭. Analysis of the fractal intrinsic quality in the ionization of Rydberg helium and lithium atoms[J]. 中国物理B, 2018, 27(5): 53401-053401.
[6]	张登红, 颉录有, 蒋军, 武中文, 董晨钟, 师应龙, 屈一至. Electron-impact single ionizaiton for W⁴⁺ and W⁵⁺[J]. 中国物理B, 2018, 27(5): 53402-053402.
[7]	刘世东, 赵永涛, 王瑜玉. Simulations of guiding of low-energy ions through a single nanocapillary in insulating materials[J]. 中国物理B, 2017, 26(10): 106104-106104.
[8]	赵敏福, 单旭, 牛姗姗, 陈向军. Relativistic and distorted wave effects on Xe 4d electron momentum distributions[J]. 中国物理B, 2017, 26(9): 93103-093103.
[9]	徐秀兰, 张延惠, 蔡祥吉, 赵国鹏, 康丽莎. Fractal dynamics in the ionization of helium Rydberg atoms[J]. 中国物理B, 2016, 25(11): 110301-110301.
[10]	郭义盼, 杨治虎, 杜树斌, 常宏伟, 夏清良, 徐秋梅. Production of projectile and target K-vacancy in near-symmetric collisions of 60-100 MeV Cu⁹⁺ ions with thin Zn target[J]. 中国物理B, 2016, 25(3): 33401-033401.
[11]	孙世艳, 苗向阳, 贾祥富. Triple differential cross sections of magnesium in doubly symmetric geometry[J]. 中国物理B, 2016, 25(1): 13401-013401.
[12]	李双, 颜君, 李传莹, 黄敏, 陈重阳. Resonance enhanced electron impact excitation for P-like Cu XV[J]. 中国物理B, 2015, 24(11): 113401-113401.
[13]	刘春雷, 邹士阳, 何斌, 王建国. Charge transfer of He²⁺ with H in a strong magnetic field[J]. 中国物理B, 2015, 24(9): 93402-093402.
[14]	刘世东, 赵永涛, 王瑜玉, Stolterfoht N, 程锐, 周贤明, 徐瑚珊, 肖国青. Analytical model for describing ion guiding through capillaries in insulating polymers[J]. 中国物理B, 2015, 24(8): 86104-086104.
[15]	任屏源, 邹贤容, 邵剑雄, 王诗尧, 周满, 周旺, 杨爱香, 闫鹏勋, 陈熙萌. Scaling law of single ion-atom impact ionization cross sections of noble gases from He to Xe at strong perturbative energies[J]. 中国物理B, 2015, 24(6): 63402-063402.